domain WebMarketingForum.net

[Damiry]

WebMarketingForum.net - Appraisal please ?

Hello guys ,

I would really appreciate it if you could do an appraisal on this domain name :

WebMarketingForum.net​

Please do take these into your consideration :

1. Premium Quality domain name (.com version is selling for $ 4,000 !).
2. Great Generic Highly Targeted Keywords.
3. ".net" suits perfectly for forums & internet related themes.
4. Google SERP's for "web marketing" = 9,450,000
5. Google Keyword Tool ; AVG. Search/month = 246,000
6. R/S ratio = 38.41
7. CPC for "web marketing" = $ 7.30
8. Massive market.
9. Describes its content perfectly.
10. Pronounciable & meaningful.
11. Very easy name to remember.
12. No hyphen.
13. No numerals.
14. No abbreviation.
15. No substitution.
16. Huge money potential from advertising (banner ads, Adsense, Amazon feed, eBay feed, etc.), listing fee for Marketplace subforum, Joint Venture, etc.
17. Autoupdating content by its members.

Regards,
Damiry

 

[rymngh]

mid $XXX

 

[Damiry]

mid $XXX

Hey, thanks rymngh !

Would you care to elaborate how much is "mid $xxx" ?

Is there any other input ? C'mon guys ?

 

[Damiry]

To all NamePros.com fellows,

Please make your appraisal on the domain mentioned.
That way, we can exchange some knowledge and get deeper insight about domain name prices.

Your contribution will be much appreciated.

Regards
Damiry

 

[jdenwar]

WebMarketingForum.com would be better
> I would say low $xxx to reseller undeveloped :imho:
Make a nice forum with this domain ! May be you can make a good $$$$.

Good Luck!

 

[MicroGuy]

This domain has very little value undeveloped. It's not bad, just long, average, and boring. There is nothing compelling to make me want to visit.

Low to low-mid $xx undeveloped. IMO.

Hope you prove me wrong by developing and making millions!

 

[Damiry]

WebMarketingForum.com would be better
> I would say low $xxx to reseller undeveloped :imho:
Make a nice forum with this domain ! May be you can make a good $$$$.

Good Luck!

Thanks jdenwar, appreciate it.

I would've gotten the .com for sure if I had $ 4,000 in my pocket !

Now...could you hook me up with any reseller that will buy it at low $xxx undeveloped as you suggested ? :hehe:

This domain has very little value undeveloped. It's not bad, just long, average, and boring. There is nothing compelling to make me want to visit.

Low to low-mid $xx undeveloped. IMO.

Hope you prove me wrong by developing and making millions!

Thanks for the opinion MicroGuy,

Let's look at it this way,

Since it consists of highly targeted keywords, by doing a little bit of proper promotion & SE Optimization it could simply ranked high on the Google/any other SE SERP.
(Remember, the .com version is not yet developed and most likely it will remained like that in a while considering the $ 4,000 sales price.)
With that being said, it's only a matter of a simple click on the SERP needed to go to the site. No need to type the whole name in the browser.

Please CMIIW, in the land of keywords based niche, it's not really matter if it's .com or .net. or how long or how boring the name is. What matters is how optimized they are in term of competition, on site optimization, & off site optimization.

As for developing the domain,
I'll just let the "future owner" do it and make the millions him/herself.....


Regards
Damiry

I guess the score now is 2 $xxx against 1 $xx.

C'mon guys, more appraisals wanted.

 

[exsedo]

Hi,
Google search for the term "web marketing forum" returns 28,300 results.
Not massive interest. Another negative is the extension. Another negative is three words. I think I have to agree with Microguy here. Low to Mid $xx reseller and up to mid $xxx for a committed end user. Good Luck.

 

[Damiry]

Hi,
Google search for the term "web marketing forum" returns 28,300 results.
Not massive interest. Another negative is the extension. Another negative is three words. I think I have to agree with Microguy here. Low to Mid $xx reseller and up to mid $xxx for a committed end user. Good Luck.

Hi exsedo,

Well, I think you have to consider "web marketing" keywords also because usually it was typed in to search engine form by someone who's searching information about some aspects of web marketing.
And I think if they see there's already a forum about it, they would click it immediately.

I don't really agree on jumping into conclusion about the extension. Also .net is quite a good extension if you're run out of .coms. especially for forums & internet/technology related sites.
We can see more and more non .com names sold for really high prices.

Thanks for your opinion


Now the score is 2 $xxx against 2 $xx

More appraisals wanted, keep 'em coming guys.

 

[Traveler]

Now the score is 2 $xxx against 2 $xx

More appraisals wanted, keep 'em coming guys.

I'm in the $xx camp. Since WebMarketingForums.net is still available to register I think someone would just take that for reg fee than pay a high premium for this one.

 

[Damiry]

I'm in the $xx camp. Since WebMarketingForums.net is still available to register I think someone would just take that for reg fee than pay a high premium for this one.

Hi neobodhi,


WebMarketingForum.net = A one specific Forum for web marketer to discuss web marketing subjects.


WebMarketingForums.net = A directory/list of forums about web marketing. Should be containing links to many forums available in the net (it should be, it says "forums" right ?).



If you're a forum owner, serious about building a forum, & want to looked professional, you don't want to make a mistake by choosing the second one do you ?

Thanks for your opinion.



Well, the score now is 2 $xxx against 3 $xx

C'mon guys, who wants to settle the score ?

 

[shockie]

+1 $xx from me... but don't worry, its value is what someone will end up paying for it.

 

[-Adam-]

This domain has very little value undeveloped. It's not bad, just long, average, and boring. There is nothing compelling to make me want to visit.

Low to low-mid $xx undeveloped. IMO.

Hope you prove me wrong by developing and making millions!

I agree with MicroGuy on this one.