Dynadot โ€” .com Transfer
SpaceshipSpaceship
Watch

Who is to Blame for the Troubled US Economy?

  • This poll is still running and the standings may change.
  • Both Parties

    305 
    votes
    45.6%
  • Neither Party

    58 
    votes
    8.7%
  • Democrats

    150 
    votes
    22.4%
  • Republicans

    156 
    votes
    23.3%
  • This poll is still running and the standings may change.

Here you can spout your USA political views.

Rules:
1. Keep it clean
2. No fighting
3. Respect the views of others.
4. US Political views, No Religious views
5. Have fun :)

:wave:
 
16
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
AfternicAfternic
I love seeing Republicans vote for the dying MAGAs, just easier and bigger victories for Dems in November.
MAGA is alive and well.
 
8
•••
0
•••
Last edited:
0
•••
Cassidy is out. Massie and Cornyn are next. The RINOs will be eliminated one by one as I predicted.
 
0
•••
Cassidy is out. Massie and Cornyn are next. The RINOs will be eliminated one by one as I predicted.
Dems are loving this. You guys are going to find out listening to the lowest rated president in recent times is not the best idea.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Here is your precious predicting "God" Polymarket tonight JB. ๐Ÿคฃ one thing we can always count on is you always being proven WRONG.

IMG_2865.jpeg
 
1
•••
Here is your precious predicting "God" Polymarket tonight JB. ๐Ÿคฃ one thing we can always count on is you always being proven WRONG.

Show attachment 302631
lol your struggle. If Gallrein wins itโ€™ll actually prove me right in that polymarket is accurate. Weโ€™ll see what the final results are Monday before the election to see if they get it right again. Israel is pumping 25 million into this thing. Most expensive house primary ever, donโ€™t you read?

Youโ€™re also losing track who youโ€™re supposed to be beating for things to count. You want to beat the Democrats in November. Electing MAGAS hurts your chances. Youโ€™re more concerned with beating non-Maga Republicans than Democrats. Thatโ€™s stupid.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
0
•••
When Democrats say "trust the science" to support some new attack on basic human rights, what they really mean is "trust the scientists". And here is just one example of why we don't:

You go against your own posts with this stupid one you just posted. Finding some outlier scientist instead of the majority. Iโ€™ve never even heard of the guy or the prediction that you just posted.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
The part which gets me is, why would MAGAs support his tech bros data collection regime? Smaller government in the hands of a few elite narcissists. Is US is becoming a totalitarian authoritarian state
Most don't. Problem is, the Democrats love it. Their only real complaint is that Trump is doing it rather than their own gangsters. You had no problem with authoritarianism trends under Biden or Obama. Or Trudeau, for that matter.
 
8
•••
0
•••
I love seeing Republicans vote for the dying MAGAs, just easier and bigger victories for Dems in November.

You will require a straitjacket come November when we win bigly.

Merry Christmas and no we are not tired of winning yet๐Ÿ‘‹
 
0
•••
You will require a straitjacket come November when we win bigly.

Merry Christmas and no we are not tired of winning yet๐Ÿ‘‹
Added to my bookmarks, donโ€™t hide in November. If you were a little more intellectually curious, you would know there is no pathway for you guys winning the House. But youโ€™re a Trumper.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Do you know China still doing organ harvesting and it is a billion$$$$$ business.
Once every 100 posts you say something that is correct. Did you also know that China owns many US politicians and has spies throughout the US government and military industrial complex?
 
0
•••
Most don't. Problem is, the Democrats love it. Their only real complaint is that Trump is doing it rather than their own gangsters. You had no problem with authoritarianism trends under Biden or Obama. Or Trudeau, for that matter.

I will respond to this assertion and accusation since it is false.

People from BOTH parties are concerned about government surveillance, but Republicans are more willing to have government monitor online activity and collect personal data than Democrats...

https://yougov.com/en-us/articles/5...d-states-government-surveillance-in-2025-poll

Biden declare a national emergency once, which was an extension of Trump's Covid emergency declaration.

Obama declared 13 national emergencies including H1N1 virus outbreak, Hurricane Katrina, sanctions on countries that sponsored terrorism, transnational criminal organizations, Russian disposal of highly enriched uranium etc.

Trump has declared 21 national emergencies (more than any other president), one security (southern border) and the bulk of the rest on economic tariffs which allowed him to bypass Congress. This is an authoritarian trend.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_national_emergencies_in_the_United_States

Furthermore, Trump declaring a national emergency in order to impose tariffs on Canada for less than 1% of all fentanyl imports was a farce (ruled illegal by SCOTUS). Almost all fentanyl entering the US comes from Mexico.

Trudeau declared a national emergency once, only the second time in Canadian history. This is not a trend.

When have I said that I had no problem with Biden or Obama's emergency declarations? I wasn't even involved in this discussion at the time. That is a misleading statement.

You lie when you say that I had no problem with Trudeau imposing a national emergency to freeze accounts.
I didn't agree with his action.

Trudeau declared a national emergency which gave him the power to freeze gray accounts. That move cost him politically. It could have been handled differently.
 
Last edited:
4
•••
I will respond to this assertion and accusation since it is false.
So very gracious of you. Wrong, but gracious.
People from BOTH parties are concerned about government surveillance, but Republicans are more willing to have government monitor online activity and collect personal data than Democrats...

https://yougov.com/en-us/articles/5...d-states-government-surveillance-in-2025-poll
When you try to support a claim by just adding certain selected data points that favor your claim, you're being disingenuous.
You lie when you say that I had no problem with Trudeau imposing a national emergency to freeze accounts.
I didn't agree with his action.
I'm not going to fish through your post, but I clearly remember you having no problem with that. And now, though you have a problem with it because it was politically unwise and perhaps not the best move he could have made, you still haven't gone far enough. It was a strike at the very essence of basic human rights.

On all sides, Americans have been primed to surrender their basic rights over the past decades. And so have Canadians.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
I will respond to this assertion and accusation since it is false.

People from BOTH parties are concerned about government surveillance, but Republicans are more willing to have government monitor online activity and collect personal data than Democrats...

https://yougov.com/en-us/articles/5...d-states-government-surveillance-in-2025-poll

Biden declare a national emergency once, which was an extension of Trump's Covid emergency declaration.

Obama declared 13 national emergencies including H1N1 virus outbreak, Hurricane Katrina, sanctions on countries that sponsored terrorism, transnational criminal organizations, Russian disposal of highly enriched uranium etc.

Trump has declared 21 national emergencies (more than any other president), one security (southern border) and the bulk of the rest on economic tariffs which allowed him to bypass Congress. This is an authoritarian trend.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_national_emergencies_in_the_United_States

Furthermore, Trump declaring a national emergency in order to impose tariffs on Canada for less than 1% of all fentanyl imports was a farce (ruled illegal by SCOTUS). Almost all fentanyl entering the US comes from Mexico.

Trudeau declared a national emergency once, only the second time in Canadian history. This is not a trend.

When have I said that I had no problem with Biden or Obama's emergency declarations? I wasn't even involved in this discussion at the time. That is a misleading statement.

You lie when you say that I had no problem with Trudeau imposing a national emergency to freeze accounts.
I didn't agree with his action.
Thank you very much for the detailed information.
For us here in Europe, the news about the debate between the USA and Canada is very confusing.
But I get a clear view, when I read your posts.
 
1
•••
Once every 100 posts you say something that is correct. Did you also know that China owns many US politicians and has spies throughout the US government and military industrial complex?
And China is buying up all the farm lands that MAGA Used to own as MAGA SUPPORTERS are so dead poor NOW THAT they are being paid to be a foreign propagandists...
And there are Chinese sleepers in big cities with biological weapons...
Also don't forget, Isreal too

FOLLOW THE MONEY!!!
 
0
•••
You will require a straitjacket come November when we win bigly.

Merry Christmas and no we are not tired of winning yet๐Ÿ‘‹
It is all about the economy.... stupid!!
 
0
•••
So very gracious of you. Wrong, but gracious.

When you try to support a claim by just adding certain selected data points that favor your claim, you're being disingenuous.

I'm not going to fish through your post, but I clearly remember you having no problem with that. And now, though you have a problem with it because it was politically unwise and perhaps not the best move he could have made, you still haven't gone far enough. It was a strike at the very essence of basic human rights.

On all sides, Americans have been primed to surrender their basic rights over the past decades
๐Ÿ˜‚ got folded
 
0
•••
Spaceship
Domain Recover
CatchDoms
DomainEasy โ€” Zero Commission
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the pageโ€™s height.
Back