The USA Political Thread

[lennco]

Here you can spout your USA political views.

Rules:
1. Keep it clean
2. No fighting
3. Respect the views of others.
4. US Political views, No Religious views
5. Have fun

:wave:

 

[mr-x]

Democrats have no sense of humor. No wonder you get up set about everything.

 

[lennco]

Democrats have no sense of humor. No wonder you get up set about everything.

Seriously?
He made a joke about him looking orange, that was it. He was serous about everything else.
You make excuses for him all the time. You are a major part of the problem.

 

[mr-x]

Seriously?
He made a joke about him looking orange, that was it. He was serous about everything else.
You make excuses for him all the time. You are a major part of the problem.

Get a sense of humor.

 

[lennco]

Get a sense of humor.

Get real.

 

[mr-x]

Get real.

Really get a sense of humor

 

[lennco]

Really get a sense of humor

I got one, do you?

 

[wormfood]

Trump said the king of SA ``will be involved in taking care of families and loved ones. He feels very strongly.’’

 

[JB Lions]

Trump said the king of SA ``will be involved in taking care of families and loved ones. He feels very strongly.’’

King taking care of Trump's business interests in the region.

Get a sense of humor.

lennco already explained it to you. Trump was serious. "Trump has championed rolling back regulations since taking office in 2017, with a focus on environmental rules imposed or proposed during the Obama administration." What do you expect from a President that is anti-Environment.

Democrats Remake Impeachment Standards While Trump Remakes the Judiciary

More than 500 legal scholars sign letter saying Trump committed 'impeachable conduct'

https://www.cnn.com/2019/12/06/politics/legal-scholars-letter-trump-impeachment/index.html

 

[mr-x]

King taking care of Trump's business interests in the region.



lennco already explained it to you. Trump was serious. "Trump has championed rolling back regulations since taking office in 2017, with a focus on environmental rules imposed or proposed during the Obama administration." What do you expect from a President that is anti-Environment.



More than 500 legal scholars sign letter saying Trump committed 'impeachable conduct'

https://www.cnn.com/2019/12/06/politics/legal-scholars-letter-trump-impeachment/index.html

Scathing Report!
aka: 500 legal "scholars" liberals, 99% of all "scientist" paid liberals, transcript of Trump having a laugh.

@Patriot_Musket
The tactic here is tried and true.
"Respected legal scholars all agree that Trump committed impeachable offenses."
"92% of scientists agree that climate change is real."
"Members of America's national intelligence agencies are unassailable."

Nunes on Fox News this morning: "I [went] through all my phone records, and I can tell you, my phone records do not match what Schiff and the Democrats put in [their] report."

Corrupt, aka democrats.

 

[mr-x]

Trump Secures Release of American Student Held in Iran
https://www.politico.com/news/2019/12/07/iran-prisoner-swap-077661

Iranian held by Americans was scheduled to be released next month after cooperating with Feds.

 

[mr-x]

UNHINGED gay activist liberal ATTACKS black conservative on VIDEO!
https://therightscoop.com/unhinged-gay-activist-liberal-attacks-black-conservative-on-video/

Liberals are all unhinged. Decency seems to be the exception these days.

 

[mr-x]

Obama closes escrow on $11,000,000 beach front home. Liberals rebrand "climate change" as "climate hysterics catastrophe".

 

[JB Lions]

Scathing Report!
aka: 500 legal "scholars" liberals, 99% of all "scientist" paid liberals, transcript of Trump having a laugh.

@Patriot_Musket
The tactic here is tried and true.
"Respected legal scholars all agree that Trump committed impeachable offenses."
"92% of scientists agree that climate change is real."
"Members of America's national intelligence agencies are unassailable.".

mr-x basically saying:

educated folk = liberals, or
scientists and legal scholars = liberals

in defense he comes up with a tweet from Patriot_Musket

------------------------
North Korea's U.N. envoy says denuclearization off negotiating table with United States

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/worl...able-with-united-states/ar-BBXU3hq?li=BBnb7Kz

 

[mr-x]

mr-x basically saying:

educated folk = liberals, or
scientists and legal scholars = liberals

in defense he comes up with a tweet from Patriot_Musket

mr-x IS saying no one is surprised 500 liberal professors / lawyers / criminals would impeach trump for having large salt and pepper shakers. Liberals are hypocrites and willing to believe any outlandish prediction with the words "climate change".

------------------------
North Korea's U.N. envoy says denuclearization off negotiating table with United States

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/worl...able-with-united-states/ar-BBXU3hq?li=BBnb7Kz

LOL.

 

[JB Lions]

mr-x IS saying no one is surprised 500 liberal professors / lawyers / criminals would impeach trump for having large salt and pepper shakers. Liberals are hypocrites and willing to believe any outlandish prediction with the words "climate change".



LOL.

Why do you waste your time, continually making yourself look silly with stuff like that? Legal scholars. Again, you associate scholars with being liberal, you're giving liberals a compliment. You come back with some tweet from somebody. You don't know their political leaning at all, didn't take apart the arguments they made. Why don't you do that with your next post, actually go thru the article and take it apart.

The tactic here is tried and true.

Folded. Dodged it.

Legal scholar who testified in congress had to "cross the street" to avoid waking in front of a building with Trump's name on it. The other thought Trump should be impeached for mean tweets.

Get out of here.

Continually posting stupid stuff. Mentioning 1 scholar crossing the street, isn't an argument against the article and 500 legal scholars. It's just you running away again posting up dumb stuff that has nothing to do with the post.

 

[mr-x]

The tactic here is tried and true.

"Respected legal scholars all agree that Trump committed impeachable offenses."

"92% of scientists agree that climate change is real."

"Members of America's national intelligence agencies are unassailable.

Why do you waste your time, continually making yourself look silly with stuff like that? Legal scholars. Again, you associate scholars with being liberal, you're giving liberals a compliment. You come back with some tweet from somebody. You don't know their political leaning at all, didn't take apart the arguments they made. Why don't you do that with your next post, actually go thru the article and take it apart.

"legal scholars".

 

[mr-x]

Legal scholar who testified in congress had to "cross the street" to avoid walking in front of a building with Trump's name on it. The other thought Trump should be impeached for mean tweets.

Get out of here.

 

[Domainace]

Too bad the left has no sense of humor. America is the funniest place in the world these days. But you'll be accused of a hate crime if you laugh about it.

 

[mr-x]

Why do you waste your time, continually making yourself look silly with stuff like that? Legal scholars. Again, you associate scholars with being liberal, you're giving liberals a compliment. You come back with some tweet from somebody. You don't know their political leaning at all, didn't take apart the arguments they made. Why don't you do that with your next post, actually go thru the article and take it apart.



Folded. Dodged it.



Continually posting stupid stuff. Mentions 1 scholar crossing the street, when the article is about 500 legal scholars. Dumb Trumpers. Still not taking the article apart. Everybody can see you're dodging it. Quote something in the article, take it apart. Some running from it.

JB hides his replies in previous post when he's loosing but can't stand not having the last word.

If you're a liberal preaching climate change will end the world but haven't sterilized yourself, you're just another hypocrite tool of the system.

If you're think 500 "legal scholars" who think trump should be impeached aren't liberals, you're just stupid.

 

[JB Lions]

JB hides his replies in previous post when he's loosing but can't stand not having the last word.

I've explained it to you before. It's because you have this habit of going on and on about something, just to fill up pages because you're bored.

First, doing dumb screenshots when the post is already there for anybody to read.

Then, you mentioning 1 scholar crossing the street, isn't an argument against the article and 500 legal scholars. It's just you running away again posting up dumb stuff that has nothing to do with the post.

Now, tell me, why don't you take the legal arguments in the article apart? Quote something in the article and then tell me why you disagree. Actual discussion.