The USA Political Thread

[lennco]

Here you can spout your USA political views.

Rules:
1. Keep it clean
2. No fighting
3. Respect the views of others.
4. US Political views, No Religious views
5. Have fun

:wave:

 

[Domainace]

So, your message is that it is bad to go to distant countries to kill wildlife, but patriotic to go to distant countries to kill the people?

And some sons...

...get sent to Africa for multiple tours of duty to serve and protect the savannah.

And other sons don't serve at all due to debilitating health issues.

But thankfully, it didn't keep him from proudly serving in his school sports programs!

And some sons served with purpose, suffered the consequences but survived and came back to continue serving their country with honor in other ways!

 

[enlytend]

Wants to pretend he's pro-freedom.

Forcing a woman to produce a rape baby* isn’t “pro freedom.” “Pro freedom for straight cisgendered white males” is more accurate.

I have yet to see the outrage from these “pro life” folks about the ACTUAL babies being killed in Northern Syria ...

* at the risk of her health, life and economic status. You can’t force someone to donate blood or organs, even to save a life, you shouldn’t be able to force someone to reproduce. Wanna grow stuff, take up gardening,

 

[mr-x]

As I said, anti-Freedom. There really isn't anything to debate on this one. If it was up to you, women wouldn't be able to decide what they do with their own body. If it was up to you, gay people couldn't marry. Save the charade.

I expect people, including women to respect others rights as well as their own. Natural rights don't come without responsibility.

Are you capable of debating without condescension?

 

[mr-x]

Forcing a woman to produce a rape baby* isn’t “pro freedom.” “Pro freedom for straight cisgendered white males” is more accurate.

The amendments of the constitution are laws limiting the Gov's power over your natural rights. The exercise of these rights do not infringe on others rights.

There is no right "not be offended"; there is no right to murder.

I have yet to see the outrage from these “pro life” folks about the ACTUAL babies being killed in Northern Syria ...

You always result to a false comparisons. Why do leftist ignore the humanity of helpless, unborn children? For some reason, a sad little girl with a cat has value, but an 8 month old baby does not.

* at the risk of her health, life and economic status. You can’t force someone to donate blood or organs, even to save a life, you shouldn’t be able to force someone to reproduce. Wanna grow stuff, take up gardening,

Babies don't ask to be created. Unborn and born babies are helpless and dependent on their parents, who are responsible for them.

** Abortion survivors speak in support of the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, which seeks to ensure infants who survive abortions are given medical care appropriate to other children their age.
https://www.dailysignal.com/2019/10...vors-with-stories-of-dignity-and-forgiveness/

Democrats would rather let them die. But muh Trump.

 

[mr-x]

That time the earth was going to be covered in ice and we were all going to die...

 

[GILSAN]

Forcing a woman to produce a rape baby* isn’t “pro freedom.”

99.999999999999% of the people have no problem with a woman that's been raped having an abortion, or if her life is in danger.

I have yet to see the outrage from these “pro life” folks about the ACTUAL babies being killed in Northern Syria ...

I have yet to see your outrage about all the killings done in Syria and other Arab countries, done by Muslims against Muslims and non-Muslims!

 

[GILSAN]

 

[GILSAN]

 

[GILSAN]

 

[GILSAN]

 

[GILSAN]

 

[GILSAN]

 

[GILSAN]

 

[GILSAN]

 

[GILSAN]

 

[GILSAN]

 

[GILSAN]

 

[enlytend]

Reuters reports that following Turkish bombing, 785 ISIS prisoners have escaprd from prison

785.

Re: Saudis paying for US troop deployment. Peachy. Since when are our armed forces mercenaries for hire? How much are they paying per US life lost?

 

[TestCase]

Yet when the republicans had control of the House, Senate and Presidency at the same, they did not correct these issues. Guess it wasn't that important to them.

 

[enlytend]

Re: social security for immigrants:
https://www.investopedia.com/articl...ants-over-65-and-social-security-benefits.asp

“While individuals don’t necessarily have to be U.S. citizens to qualify for U.S. Social Security benefits, they must have paid into the system for at least 10 years, or they must have accumulated enough credits between the U.S.'s system and that of a foreign country with whom the U.S. has a totalization agreement.” (And this is checked against the other country’s records.)

Totalization gives people credit for their work history in both countries while preventing “double dipping.” We have a totalization agreement with a number of countries, mostly European countries, including Portugal.