The USA Political Thread

[lennco]

Here you can spout your USA political views.

Rules:
1. Keep it clean
2. No fighting
3. Respect the views of others.
4. US Political views, No Religious views
5. Have fun

:wave:

 

[Kate]

But Islam is fair game.

 

[mr-x]

But Islam is fair game.

If you have a legit example of me criticizing a politician or person for being a Muslim.. please remind me. If you want to criticize Christianity, have at it.

My post was about a double standard the democrats have started, echoed by corrupt media that Christianity is a problem. They would never say such a thing about Islam.. though many of their sexual, social morals are EXACTLY the same.

 

[Kate]

If you have a legit example of me criticizing a politician or person for being a Muslim..

But then why do you support 45 ?
It's easy to say I am not racist while enabling racists at he same time.

 

[enlytend]

Show attachment 107798 Show attachment 107799 Show attachment 107800 Show attachment 107801

What a lot of pointless drivel.

You really want to stop abortions?
Women don't get pregnant by themselves, they just have to deal with the consequences
.
If guys - every single guy - never, EVER had unprotected sex unless they AND their partner were planning to start or add to a family (and could AFFORD to do so), virtually EVERY pregnancy would be wanted and demand for abortions would be practically nonexistent.

Instead of bringing your boys to a "right to life" march, sit them down in a classroom and teach them that.

Much more productive. Stop whining and do something about it.

Then we'd be left with 3 situations:
1) Rape / incest / non-consensual sex resulting in pregnancy - Sorry, but guys who do that don't deserve to reproduce, and the woman shouldn't be forced to spend the next 9 months compromising her own health with a reminder of it unless she really wants to.
2) Health / life of the mother - (Fetus is dying and poisoning the mother and/or a twin, mother gets a stage 3 cancer diagnosis mid-pregnancy and has to start treatment immediately...)
3) And the one you'll still argue about - non-viable fetus or severe birth defect. Anencephaly, etc.

 

[mr-x]

But then why do you support 45 ?
It's easy to say I am not racist while enabling racists at he same time.

I guess we have different opinions about that. If I didn't talk to racist, I'd be a lonely person.

 

[mr-x]

What a lot of pointless drivel.

Life is the #1st human right.

You really want to stop abortions?
Women don't get pregnant by themselves, they just have to deal with the consequences
.
If guys never - NEVER - had unprotected sex unless they AND their partner were planning to start or add to a family (and could AFFORD to do so), EVERY pregnancy would be wanted and demand for abortions would be practically nonexistent.

Instead of bringing your boys to a "right to life" march, sit them down in a classroom and teach them that.

Much more productive.

Then we'd be primarily left with 3 situations:
1) Rape / incest / non-consensual sex resulting in pregnancy - Sorry, but guys who do that don't deserve to reproduce, and the woman shouldn't have to spend the next 9 months compromising her own health with a reminder of it.
2) Health / life of the mother - (Fetus is dying and poisoning the mother and/or a twin, mother gets a stage 3 cancer diagnosis mid-pregnancy and has to start treatment immediately...)
3) And the one you'll still argue about - non-viable fetus or severe birth defect. Anencephaly, etc.

 

[mr-x]

But then why do you support 45 ?
It's easy to say I am not racist while enabling racists at he same time.

Be honest Kate, racism and bigotry are human problems not political.

 

[Kate]

What a lot of pointless drivel.

You really want to stop abortions?
Women don't get pregnant by themselves, they just have to deal with the consequences

You noticed that too. It's always about repressing women rights. Blame the woman.
And surely, a lot of those abortions would not be taking place if the male party didn't go awol ?
Blame the woman.

I guess we have different opinions about that. If I didn't talk to racist, I'd be a lonely person.

You mean you are surrounded with racists and trying to fit in ?

 

[enlytend]

You noticed that too. It's always about repressing women rights. Blame the woman.

Thing is, a woman could be the most shameless slut on the planet. Have sex ALL DAY LONG - for days at a time even - with as many partners as she could find ...

And if all the GUYS were careful and responsible, voila - no pregnancy!

Teach responsibility to boys from the time they're old enough to think about it.

 

[mr-x]

You noticed that too. It's always about repressing women rights. Blame the woman.
And surely, a lot of those abortions would not be taking place if the male party didn't go awol ?
Blame the woman.

Only a women can make the decision to kill her unborn baby. Men just support the baby if it lives long enough. There are competing rights, the woman and baby. But the baby is helpless, not involved in it's own creation and deserves protection.

You mean you are surrounded with racists and trying to fit in ?

No, I mean if I didn't talk to racist, I would be have a conversation with you, or pretty much anyone.

 

[.X.]

What a lot of pointless drivel.

You really want to stop abortions?
Women don't get pregnant by themselves, they just have to deal with the consequences
.
If guys - every single guy - never, EVER had unprotected sex unless they AND their partner were planning to start or add to a family (and could AFFORD to do so), virtually EVERY pregnancy would be wanted and demand for abortions would be practically nonexistent.

Instead of bringing your boys to a "right to life" march, sit them down in a classroom and teach them that.

Much more productive. Stop whining and do something about it.

Then we'd be left with 3 situations:
1) Rape / incest / non-consensual sex resulting in pregnancy - Sorry, but guys who do that don't deserve to reproduce, and the woman shouldn't be forced to spend the next 9 months compromising her own health with a reminder of it unless she really wants to.
2) Health / life of the mother - (Fetus is dying and poisoning the mother and/or a twin, mother gets a stage 3 cancer diagnosis mid-pregnancy and has to start treatment immediately...)
3) And the one you'll still argue about - non-viable fetus or severe birth defect. Anencephaly, etc.

You make a valid ass point, we men haven’t held up our end of preventing unwanted pregnancies, I can’t argue with that.

 

[.X.]

What we currently have is a cluster fuck cesspool of so many issues that need to be resolved ASAP. Should have been fully addressed and resolved years ago.

These same issues have been around for decades and have not been taken care of, now I see people have had enough and the core is beginning to rot.

Divide and concur is running its course now, it appears little can be done to stop it at this point. The people are too divided amidst all the confusions of trying to distinguish a middle ground.

all of this will just have to run it’s course and play it’s way out, the final outcome? Your guess is as good as mine.

 

[enlytend]

You make a valid ass point, we men haven’t held up our end of preventing unwanted pregnancies, I can’t argue with that.

It may not a popular thing to say, but when you think about it, the guy has complete control over whether a woman can become pregnant or not.

 

[Kate]

Refresher (might come in handy for disoriented voters)

 

[mr-x]

This infantilizes women. Both parties are responsible, only one get to make a choice to kill their child.

It may not a popular thing to say, but when you think about it, the guy has complete control over whether a woman can become pregnant or not.

 

[mr-x]

Now do the Jews Kate.

Refresher (might come in handy for disoriented voters)

Gillibrand will be the keynote speaker at the Women's March in Iowa on Saturday. ... On Tuesday, Gillibrand announced the formation of an exploratory committee for her to run to be the next President of the United States

 

[enlytend]

Secret North Korean missile base Sino-ri found – and there could be 19 more, say researchers

• The discovery comes as the US and North Korea are coordinating a second summit between the US President Donald Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong-un

https://www.scmp.com/news/asia/east...rean-missile-operating-base-sino-ri-found-one

You didn’t think Kim was really thinking of giving up his missiles, did you?

 

[mr-x]

Of course they have missiles, we're not five year olds. You know what they don't have?? A big crater where Kim's house used to be because NK accidentally hit Japan with "test" shot.

Secret North Korean missile base Sino-ri found – and there could be 19 more, say researchers

• The discovery comes as the US and North Korea are coordinating a second summit between the US President Donald Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong-un

https://www.scmp.com/news/asia/east...rean-missile-operating-base-sino-ri-found-one

You didn’t think Kim was really thinking of giving up his missles, did you?

 

[enlytend]

This infantilizes women.

How? That’s a cop out answer if I ever heard one. You gonna to “mansplain” that to me?

I wasn’t making a judgement statement, i was stating a fact. A woman can’t get pregnant if sperm can’t reach an egg. Fact. Do you agree?

If the COUPLE both want to have a baby then they make that decision as a couple.

I think the actual reason you’re rejecting what I said is that you probably think it’s too inconvenient. And “real men” or “alpha males” or some such shouldn’t be “inconvenienced.”

Well carrying a baby for 9 months, delivery (kind of like passing an orange through your penis) and the subsequent 18+ years raising a child certainly isn’t “convenient” yet you wouldn’t hesitate to foist that on every woman who some man impregnates.

“Right to life” my a**. If you don’t wanting anyone “killing babies” then don’t make any unwanted babies. Problem. Solved.

 

[mr-x]

This infantilizes women. Both parties are responsible, only one gets to make a choice to kill their child.

Stop playing the helpless victim.

How? That’s a cop out answer if I ever heard one. You gonna to “mansplain” that to me?

I wasn’t making a judgement statement, i was stating a fact. A woman can’t get pregnant if sperm can’t reach an egg. Fact. Do you agree?

If the COUPLE both want to have a baby then they make that decision as a couple.

I think the actual reason you’re rejecting what I said is that you probably think it’s too inconvenient. And “real men” or “alpha males” or some such shouldn’t be “inconvenienced.”

Well carrying a baby for 9 months, delivery (kind of like passing an orange through your penis) and the subsequent 18+ years raising a child certainly isn’t “convenient” yet you wouldn’t hesitate to foist that on every woman who some man impregnates.

“Right to life” my a**. If you don’t wanting anyone “killing babies” then don’t make any unwanted babies. Problem. Solved.