The USA Political Thread

[lennco]

Here you can spout your USA political views.

Rules:
1. Keep it clean
2. No fighting
3. Respect the views of others.
4. US Political views, No Religious views
5. Have fun

:wave:

 

[mr-x]

36-37 years later on September 25th 2018, she remembered... Thanks for the good laugh Enlytend...

She didn't even remember. "She became aware of". No allegation Brett Kavanaugh did anything to her or anyone else. Just aware he was somewhere while a crime was committed.

Sorry Entitled. No there, there.

 

[Kate]

For sure, these women did not pick a soft target: a federal judge, no less than that. Somebody who knows the law and is perfectly able to defend himself by all legal means available.
And what do they stand to gain in all of this ? Even if you are badly seeking revenge against somebody for some obscure reason, you don't expose yourself to the whole world while blowing your reputation and career and making yourself subject to criminal penalties.
No need for conspiracy theories here. This is not a political issue.

 

[mr-x]

For sure, these women did not pick a soft target: a federal judge, no less than that. Somebody who knows the law and is perfectly able to defend himself by all legal means available.
And what do they stand to gain in all of this ? Even if you are badly seeking revenge against somebody for some obscure reason, you don't expose yourself to the whole world while blowing your reputation and career and making yourself subject to criminal penalties.
No need for conspiracy theories here.

This is not a political issue.

Yes it is.

 

[mr-x]

Wow.. this is falling apart quickly.

 

[mr-x]

Here's some better news:

Report Finds $3.1 Trillion in Savings for Taxpayers
Citizens Against Gov't Waste recommends cutting subsidies, redundant programs
https://freebeacon.com/politics/report-finds-3-1-trillion-in-savings-for-taxpayers/

 

[GILSAN]

Human Rights For Rapists...

 

[mr-x]

 

[mr-x]

Tell me if I’m missing something
The written statement does not mention Kavanaugh
The polygraph queried whether the written statement was true
The interview – where Kavanaugh’s name was mentioned – was not subject to polygraph
Am I wrong?#ConfirmKavanaugh https://no_url_shorteners/cFc6jx60Hp
— Will Chamberlain (@willchamberlain) September 26, 2018

~ not political.

 

[JB Lions]

I just asked the question, what kind of person watches her friends get drugged and gang raped, then keeps socializing with the rapist?

Do you feel if somebody was raped, they would still support the rapist on the campaign trail, take a position on a board offered by the rapist?

------------
The idiot President is still talking:

Avenatti is a third rate lawyer who is good at making false accusations, like he did on me and like he is now doing on Judge Brett Kavanaugh. He is just looking for attention and doesn’t want people to look at his past record and relationships - a total low-life!
Donald J. Trump‏Verified account @realDonaldTrump

But he was right, what is he talking about? It's now known he had sex with Stormy Daniels, paid her off.
--------------
Kavanaugh probably shouldn't have done that Fox News interview, trying to come off as some choir boy.

His yearbook:
“100 kegs or bust”

This month, Renate Schroeder Dolphin joined 64 other women who, saying they knew Judge Kavanaugh during their high school years, signed a letter to the leaders of the Senate Judiciary Committee, which is weighing Judge Kavanaugh’s nomination. The letter stated that “he has behaved honorably and treated women with respect.”

When Ms. Dolphin signed the Sept. 14 letter, she wasn’t aware of the “Renate” yearbook references on the pages of Judge Kavanaugh and his football teammates.

“I learned about these yearbook pages only a few days ago,” Ms. Dolphin said in a statement to The New York Times. “I don’t know what ‘Renate Alumnus’ actually means. I can’t begin to comprehend what goes through the minds of 17-year-old boys who write such things, but the insinuation is horrible, hurtful and simply untrue. I pray their daughters are never treated this way. I will have no further comment.”

So basically lying.

Why Brett Kavanaugh’s yearbook page matters
The “Renate Alumni” jokes reveal so much about American misogyny.
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-poli...rett-kavanaugh-yearbook-georgetown-prep-trump

 

[Kate]

45 is not an unbiased party in all of this. He should be happy the focus has shifted away from him, but that is only temporary. He will be dealt with in due time.

 

[JB Lions]

Was the Avenatti Bombshell Witness Claim All the Result of a Well Executed 4Chan Prank?

https://www.redstate.com/brandon_morse/2018/09/25/avanetti-scandal-result-well-executed-4chan-prank/

TL;DR; Probably.

Mobs are stupid, gullible people.

So not probably.

Lawyer identifies third Brett Kavanaugh accuser as Julie Swetnick
US news 2 hours ago
Attorney Michael Avenatti released a declaration from his new client Julie Swetnick, who becomes the third woman to accuse the Supreme Court nominee of sexual misconduct. Kavanaugh denies the allegations saying they're from the "Twilight Zone."

 

[mr-x]

So not probably.

Lawyer identifies third Brett Kavanaugh accuser as Julie Swetnick
US news 2 hours ago
Attorney Michael Avenatti released a declaration from his new client Julie Swetnick, who becomes the third woman to accuse the Supreme Court nominee of sexual misconduct. Kavanaugh denies the allegations saying they're from the "Twilight Zone."

Looks like the prank was one everyone but CPL.

Playing this game again.

 

[mr-x]

Here we go...

Do you feel if somebody was raped, they would still support the rapist on the campaign trail, take a position on a board offered by the rapist?

I don't know what this leading question has to do with anything.

------------
The idiot President is still talking:

Avenatti is a third rate lawyer who is good at making false accusations, like he did on me and like he is now doing on Judge Brett Kavanaugh. He is just looking for attention and doesn’t want people to look at his past record and relationships - a total low-life!
Donald J. Trump‏Verified account @realDonaldTrump

But he was right, what is he talking about? It's now known he had sex with Stormy Daniels, paid her off.
--------------
Kavanaugh probably shouldn't have done that Fox News interview, trying to come off as some choir boy.

His yearbook:
“100 kegs or bust”

This month, Renate Schroeder Dolphin joined 64 other women who, saying they knew Judge Kavanaugh during their high school years, signed a letter to the leaders of the Senate Judiciary Committee, which is weighing Judge Kavanaugh’s nomination. The letter stated that “he has behaved honorably and treated women with respect.”

When Ms. Dolphin signed the Sept. 14 letter, she wasn’t aware of the “Renate” yearbook references on the pages of Judge Kavanaugh and his football teammates.

“I learned about these yearbook pages only a few days ago,” Ms. Dolphin said in a statement to The New York Times. “I don’t know what ‘Renate Alumnus’ actually means. I can’t begin to comprehend what goes through the minds of 17-year-old boys who write such things, but the insinuation is horrible, hurtful and simply untrue. I pray their daughters are never treated this way. I will have no further comment.”

So basically lying.

Why Brett Kavanaugh’s yearbook page matters
The “Renate Alumni” jokes reveal so much about American misogyny.
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-poli...rett-kavanaugh-yearbook-georgetown-prep-trump

High school year book and gossip are what you're going with?

I have a question for you. Why didn't CB Ford mention Kavanaugh by name in her statement written for the polygraph?

Despite the real evidence this is slander, are you going with guilt by association, gossip and year book signatures as evidence?

https://twitchy.com/sarahd-313035/2...her-case-by-releasing-polygraph-results-pics/

 

[mr-x]

Another day ending in Y

The idiot President is still talking

 

[JB Lions]

Another day ending in Y

Yes, everybody here is well aware it's another day you dodge, are wrong, post misinformation etc. You've been wrong on everything so far. She's testifying, not a 4chan prank.

Here we go...


I don't know what this leading question has to do with anything.

It was a simple question. Have 1 day a week where you don't play Mr. Dodge. Here it is again:

"Do you feel if somebody was raped, they would still support the rapist on the campaign trail, take a position on a board offered by the rapist?"

Yes or no?

High school year book and gossip are what you're going with?

It's about him lying. He's up for the highest court.

 

[mr-x]

Yes, everybody here is well aware it's another day you dodge, are wrong, post misinformation etc. You've been wrong on everything so far. She's testifying, not a 4chan prank.

I know you like to pretend your smart and right about everything. It's boring.

#fever dreams...

It's about him lying. He's up for the highest court.

He's not lying.

 

[JB Lions]

I know you like to pretend your smart and right about everything. It's boring.

He's not lying.

You have been wrong, that's a fact.

"Do you feel if somebody was raped, they would still support the rapist on the campaign trail, take a position on a board offered by the rapist?"

Yes or no?

Don't be so fearful all the time, it's not a trick question.

 

[mr-x]

Hate makes you stupid.

"Do you feel if somebody was raped, they would still support the rapist on the campaign trail, take a position on a board offered by the rapist?"

Yes or no?

Grow up, make your point or go back to fapping over Trump tweets.

BTW, don't bother reading anything I posted this morning, just enjoy your ignorance.

 

[JB Lions]

Hate makes you stupid.


Grow up, make your point or go back to fapping over Trump tweets.

See, this is why I do that "sub post" thing you cry about. I ask a simple question, instead of answering it you want to take it to many pages dodging it. Thanks for proving my point. It's literally a yes or no question. You can say yes or no with your next post. So which is it?

You sub-post because you don't want to deal with my replies. I don't answer your b/s question because you obviously have an ulterior motive. If I've contradicted myself, just say it. Won't be the first or last time.

I've always dealt with your replies, the problem is you run from replying. Like now. I've already explained it multiple times, again a few days ago. You like to drag stuff, when all it takes is literally 1 reply, not 2 pages of dodging.

 

[mr-x]

See, this is why I do that "sub post" thing you cry about. I ask a simple question, instead of answering it you want to take it to many pages dodging it. Thanks for proving my point. It's literally a yes or no question. You can say yes or no with your next post. So which is it?

You sub-post because you don't want to deal with my replies. I don't answer your b/s question because you obviously have an ulterior motive. If I've contradicted myself, just say it. Won't be the first or last time.