The USA Political Thread

[lennco]

Here you can spout your USA political views.

Rules:
1. Keep it clean
2. No fighting
3. Respect the views of others.
4. US Political views, No Religious views
5. Have fun

:wave:

 

[mr-x]

No, if the staff / source actually saw and heard these things they are called “eyewitness accounts.”

If the comment was made to the staff being quoted, not when staff is repeating a conversation they've overheard. Really not the hard.

I'm not saying any of it's not true, just waiting to hear "the rest of the story".

 

[lennco]

Trumptards love to be in a place called Denial, It's a nice warm fuzzy place for them to hang out and make each other feel better.

 

[mr-x]

lol, yes, everybody is making things up about him. All the video, audio that's been leaked by various sources, not real, haha.

Why don't you stop being a bitch and sub-quoting me? I know being skeptical isn't in your nature but give it a try.

How many times have you and entittled posted crap that was discredited a few days later? Dozens.

 

[JB Lions]

Why don't you stop being a bitch and sub-quoting me? I know being skeptical isn't in your nature but give it a try.

How many times you have you and entittled posted crap that was discredited a few days later? Dozens.

I don't even know what sub-quoting means. That's the 2nd time you quoted the same quote. And now you're name calling, which usually means you know you're in the wrong. How about stop being so damn gullible all the time? How about giving that a try for even just 1 day? You're the biggest Trump stan here, it's funny watching you try to defend this stuff. not doing a very good job.

Was the course offered free to you? Were you compensated in any way?

Looks like you don't read anywhere. That was in the article, you didn't read.

 

[mr-x]

Only one kind of Democrat.

 

[mr-x]

I'm the one saying wait 48 hours before you believe every story you read.

I don't even know what sub-quoting means. That's the 2nd time you quoted the same quote. And now you're name calling, which usually means you know you're in the wrong. How about stop being so damn gullible all the time? How about giving that a try for even just 1 day? You're the biggest Trump stan here, it's funny watching you try to defend this stuff. not doing a very good job.

It wasn't

Looks like you don't read anywhere. That was in the article, you didn't read.

 

[mr-x]

Why would anyone not be skeptical of a third party or even a 2nd party report about what the Presidents staff said?

Lying democrat claiming a Jewish woman is flashing a white power sign at Kavanaugh's confirmation.

 

[mr-x]

Democrats don't lie, they just don't tell the truth

 

[mr-x]

Not even 12 hours. General James Mattis says Woodward's anonymous source is lying.

Wow.. I don't know who to believe. The Secretary of Defense or the #resistance.

I don't even know what sub-quoting means. That's the 2nd time you quoted the same quote. And now you're name calling, which usually means you know you're in the wrong. How about stop being so damn gullible all the time? How about giving that a try for even just 1 day? You're the biggest Trump stan here, it's funny watching you try to defend this stuff. not doing a very good job.



Looks like you don't read anywhere. That was in the article, you didn't read.

 

[JB Lions]

You believe Trump, that's your problem.

Some Trump lie trackers:

https://www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ng-claims-in-558-days/?utm_term=.cddfb11ec4d2

http://projects.thestar.com/donald-trump-fact-check/

https://www.nrdc.org/trump-lies

so many, probably have to work overtime with this

 

[mr-x]

Hate makes you stupid. I didn't say I believed Trump. I said I believed SOD James Mattis.

You believe Trump, that's your problem.

Some Trump lie trackers:

https://www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ng-claims-in-558-days/?utm_term=.cddfb11ec4d2

http://projects.thestar.com/donald-trump-fact-check/

https://www.nrdc.org/trump-lies

so many, probably have to work overtime with this

 

[JB Lions]

Hate makes you stupid.

OK stupid.

Being gullible = stupid. Smarten up.

 

[mr-x]

Being gullible = stupid. Smarten up.

OK stupid.


"The denials from Kelly, Dowd, Mattis are pretty explicit and direct. Bob Woodward’s sources are, as always, anonymous so we may never know who’s right." ~Brit Hume

 

[mr-x]

He's half white so it make sense

 

[mr-x]

Being gullible = stupid. Smarten up.

If you're going to sub-post about me like a little bitch who's afraid of the response, include the entire post.

 

[JB Lions]

If you're going to sub-post about me like a little bitch who's afraid of the response, include the entire post.

Nobody is afraid of your responses, you're just a gullible Trump supporter. I did include the entire post when I made the post. You keep adding stuff afterwards:

mr-x, 16 minutes ago
Last edited: 14 minutes ago

Since you like Britt Hume:

Brit Hume on Woodward book: 'Good thing' advisers restrain Trump from 'reckless impulses'
http://thehill.com/homenews/adminis...-book-good-thing-presidents-advisers-restrain

Hey dumb dumb

 

[mr-x]

Best part abou today, Kavanaugh is one day closer to being an Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court and all democrats have done is lay down and kick their feet.

 

[mr-x]

Hey dumb dumb, I didn't say Woodward wasn't truthful or I didn't believe him. I said I'd wait to find out how many of his stories are from anonymous, 2nd hand sources.

Nobody is afraid of your responses, you're just a gullible Trump supporter. I did include the entire post when I made the post. You keep adding stuff afterwards:

mr-x, 16 minutes ago
Last edited: 14 minutes ago

Since you like Britt Hume:

Brit Hume on Woodward book: 'Good thing' advisers restrain Trump from 'reckless impulses'
http://thehill.com/homenews/adminis...-book-good-thing-presidents-advisers-restrain

 

[Domainace]

No, if the staff / source actually saw and heard these things they are called “eyewitness accounts.”

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/do-the-eyes-have-it/

A good read for people with an open mind.

 

[enlytend]

This is crazy!
State Farm To Pay $250M To Settle Rigged-Judge Trial
https://www.law360.com/amp/articles/1079406

Lawsuit claimed SF paid 3.5 million through shell companies to get a friendly judge onto the IL court... who immediately overturned a 1 billion dollar judgement against them.
It was set to go to trial. Settlement was less than the 8.5. billion the plaintiffs (5 million of them in the class) were asking, but you don’t pay 1/4 billion to avoid a trial unless there’s a good reason...