SpaceshipSpaceship
Watch

Who is to Blame for the Troubled US Economy?

  • This poll is still running and the standings may change.
  • Both Parties

    305 
    votes
    45.6%
  • Neither Party

    58 
    votes
    8.7%
  • Democrats

    150 
    votes
    22.4%
  • Republicans

    156 
    votes
    23.3%
  • This poll is still running and the standings may change.

Here you can spout your USA political views.

Rules:
1. Keep it clean
2. No fighting
3. Respect the views of others.
4. US Political views, No Religious views
5. Have fun :)

:wave:
 
16
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
GoDaddyGoDaddy
0
•••
On the contrary, in the last couple of days he's blatantly aligning with our main adversary, supporting their message, and dissing our Western allies, free press and security professionals.

Besides Pres. Trump criticizing CNN, do you have any proof he's "aligning with our main adversary" ?
 
0
•••
You Gotta Have Faith
http://www.weeklystandard.com/you-gotta-have-faith/article/2259

Second, Bush is humble before God. Not engrossed with his own thoughts, he seems to be a good judge of others. He was able to read Russian leader Vladimir Putin better than most Russia experts. He seems deft at understanding other people's spiritual states.

--
@enlytend
Editorial opinion by the same publication criticizing Pres. Trump and SOS Tillerson's meeting with Putin.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Yeah that Bush article was an idiotic pile off crap. What's your point?
More deflection and whattaboutism - boring. I asked what you thought of points made in a completely different editorial.
 
0
•••
2
•••
Yeah that Bush article was an idiotic pile off crap. What's your point?
More deflection and whattaboutism - boring. I asked what you thought of points made in a completely different editorial.

Right, let me try again. opinions are biased. Weekly Standard's take was a few facts with strongly worded objections. The world of diplomacy is puzzling at best. I'll judge the President and Secretary of State on their actions which seem to be positive for the US and Europe.

Do you have actual reasons why you suspect the President is aligning with our primary foe?
 
Last edited:
1
•••
While he was in the meeting, guess who sat in for him at G20? Ivanka. Unelected, inexperienced unqualified maker of knockoff designer shoes using cheap overseas labor, representing the US among world leaders. Totally normal. Can you imagine the uproar if Obama had sent Michelle or Malia to sub for him in a meeting like that?
Yes I can. The Liberal BS Media would be drooling all over the place, telling us how beautiful they looked, how smart they are, how everyone loved them and what an asset they've become to Obama.
I read the article and in the end felt I had unfortunately lost a few good minutes of my life on a biased opinion. Stephen F. Hayes, the journalist of The Weekly Standard who wrote that article hates Trump, has always criticized him and got all his negative predictions about Trump, wrong.

He simply doesn't like Trump and thus has no credibility in my opinion.

Here's proof where he admits, he got everything wrong about Trump...
 
Last edited:
0
•••
They are cheered by clueless sheep for "resisting".

When they started using that word, I gave up. In Orwell's 1984 the resistance was also run by Big Brother. But that was just a story....
 
2
•••
Yes I can. The Liberal BS Media would be drooling all over the place, telling us how beautiful they looked, how smart they are, how everyone loved them and what an asset they've become to Obama.
That's not a fair statement and pure speculation on your part.. It would have been just as wrong had it been Michelle and for the same reasons.
He simply doesn't like Trump and thus has no credibility in my opinion.
Soooo one has to like him to have a valid opinion?

Do you have actual reasons why you suspect the President is aligning with our primary foe?

Every one of our intelligence agencies concur that they meddled in our electoral process. He would have been privy to high level briefings with evidence. Yet he disses our intelligence community publicly and accepts the one accused of being behind the attacks (or at least having knowledge of them) at his word that it didn't happen. There should be sanctions, or at least a strong warning that we know what they did and it better not happen again. None. Nothing. Crickets.

Let's watch what happens with the sanctions already in place and the two closed spy compounds...
 
0
•••
1
•••
I thought I had a great hand reg for a min lol
 
1
•••
Ivanka. Unelected, inexperienced ...representing the US among world leaders. Totally normal. Can you imagine the uproar if Obama had sent Michelle or Malia to sub for him in a meeting like that?

Although most of the Presidents staff is unelected, I agree with you.
 
1
•••
Every one of our intelligence agencies concur that they meddled in our electoral process.

Even though that lie has been retracted by all the alphabet networks, NYT and the WAPO, it persist.

I new it was a lie when the DNC first leaked it. Why would the Coast Guard or FDA be monitoring our elections, Russia or Trump's campaign. To quote Ted Cruz, it's inconceivable.

He would have been privy to high level briefings with evidence. Yet he disses our intelligence community publicly and accepts the one accused of being behind the attacks (or at least having knowledge of them) at his word that it didn't happen. There should be sanctions, or at least a strong warning that we know what they did and it better not happen again. None. Nothing. Crickets.

Let's watch what happens with the sanctions already in place and the two closed spy compounds...

The bureaucracy has been attacking President Trump since before he took his oath of office. Pres. Obama's staff and DNC have lead a smear campaign to delegitimize the election and President Trump.

Some criticism of the intelligence community, including the FBI is legitimate. I don't think they expected a New York knife fight but that's what they got.

Still waiting for sometime of proof the President of the USA has aligned with our political enemies.
 
Last edited:
1
•••
Soooo one has to like him to have a valid opinion?
Valid opinion for you and a biased opinion for me. I don't need opinions from the Media, just honest news and honest facts, from which I will form my own opinions.
 
0
•••
Even though that lie has been retracted by all the alphabet networks, NYT and the WAPO, it persist.

I new it was a lie when the DNC first leaked it. Why would the Coast Guard or FDA be monitoring our elections, Russia or Trump's campaign. To quote Ted Cruz, it's inconceivable.

The only point that was inaccurate was the number of agencies. However the major 4 - CIA, FBI, DNI and NSA - agreed with high confidence that Russia interfered in our electoral process to harm Clinton and to assist trump, on Putins orders.

https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf

So now our sitting president disregards his own intel publicly disputes their conclusions, and takes the word of the accused, completely exonerating him. Furthermore agreeing to form a joint work group on cybersecurity???

As someone put it, that's like if Bush had teamed up with Bin Laden to form a work group on flight safety.

Oh and from his tweets, it sounds like he was discussing the intel investigation with Putey?? Discussing your own country's methods and intel with an adversary? (Let's not forget about the Mossad op he burned a few weeks ago in his "no US press" meeting with Lavrov and Kisalyev.)

They also agree not to meddle in each other's domestic affairs. Sounds good, right? But it's a PR win for the Kremlin because it equates our efforts to promote democracy and free elections with their efforts to suppress them, jail political opponents, murder journalists...

Let's talk Syria. Again, cease fire sounds good. But US and Russia have until now taken very different approaches to the region, the US being anti-Assad and Russia supporting. Despite Russia's approach resulting in mass civilian casualties and displacement, Tillerson said after the meeting that their approach may be "more right" than ours? Which policy is going to prevail? Ours or theirs?

So much for punching back 10 times harder. I guess he just reserves that for the free press...or anyone who criticizes him and hurts his fee fees.

At least he finally shook hands with Merkel. Baby steps.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Here come the MOB: How the mafia are moving in on aid money being poured in to deal with Europe's migrant crisis
  • Mob is attracted by hundreds of millions in EU cash that has been given to Rome
  • From fund, those sheltering and feeding migrants receive £31 per day per person
  • Mafia, say Italian prosecutors, decided it was too good an opportunity to ignore
Not everyone, it seems, is troubled by the migrant crisis engulfing Sicily.

On one side, there are the ruthless criminal gangs making huge sums ferrying people across the Mediterranean – and now it emerges that the Mafia is exploiting the other end of the operation, attracted by the hundreds of millions in EU cash that has been given to Rome.

From this fund, including money from British taxpayers, those sheltering and feeding migrants receive £31 per day per person. Mainly it goes to hoteliers, or those owning buildings equipped to house large numbers.

Never slow to ‘wet their beaks’, the mob, according to prosecutors, decided it was too good an opportunity to ignore.

‘It is this money that has been made available to help the migrants that is attracting either the Mafia or people close to them,’ a senior prosecutor in western Sicily told The Mail on Sunday. ‘We are investigating how some of it may have reached them.’

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...g-migrant-crisis-aid-money.html#ixzz4mLdqojEc
 
0
•••
Ooh look! Another Russian "heart attack". Maybe trump should have made a deal to loan them a few cardiologists, since "heart attacks" appear to be rampant among the Russian people, especially among those who criticize Putin.

But I guess that would be "meddling in their domestic affairs", as would calling them out if the "heart attack" turns out to have been induced by an FSB agent...

https://www.rferl.org/a/russia-nosik-dead-heart-attack-blogger-internet-pioneer/28604276.html

Not at all surprised the mob would try to siphon off some money intended to go to immigrants, its the kind of thing they do.
 
Last edited:
1
•••
Ha, catching heat, now Trump is backtracking

Trump backtracks on U.S.-Russia cyber unit, says it cannot happen
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...t-says-it-cannot-happen/ar-BBE6TG2?li=BBnb7Kz

From this
Putin & I discussed forming an impenetrable Cyber Security unit so that election hacking, & many other negative things, will be guarded..

To
The fact that President Putin and I discussed a Cyber Security unit doesn't mean I think it can happen. It can't-but a ceasefire can,& did!

Don Jr. in it as well
Donald Trump Jr. met with Russian lawyer during presidential campaign after being promised information helpful to father’s effort
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/presidents-son-met-with-russian-lawyer-during-presidential-campaign-after-being-promised-information-helpful-to-fathers-effort/2017/07/09/90c0e3e8-64e9-11e7-8eb5-cbccc2e7bfbf_story.html?hpid=hp_hp-top-table-main_trumprussia-7pm:homepage/story&utm_term=.9f1665bd14ab

ratted himself out
DEUuyCtXgAAaZQE.jpg:large
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Trump and Tillerson have conflicting stories on the discussion of sanctions too. Trump says they were not discussed. Tillerson, while visiting Ukraine, seemed to say that they were...
Only the translators know for sure.
Don Jr. in it as well
Don Jr. - not the brightest bulb in the box, for sure. Totally ratted himself out. Even if nothing came of it, the fact that he admits he set up a meeting with someone representing Russia for the purpose of getting info he could use against Clinton doesn't look good.
He should watch out - he's not daddy's favorite, Donny Two Scoops would throw him under the bus in a heartbeat. (Though to be fair, he'd throw Eric first, if it came to that.)
 
0
•••
Does anybody else feel it's CNN (democrats) VS FOX (republicans)? If Trump says it's all fake news, why does he constantly tweet mainstream media reports?

Just take a look at the Presidents latest tweets...

upload_2017-7-10_14-38-53.png

upload_2017-7-10_14-39-25.png

upload_2017-7-10_14-40-33.png


Granted Barack Obama's twitter feed appears to be neutral in not retweeting Fox News or CNN, Michelle Obama has a recent tweet congratulating CNN films.

upload_2017-7-10_14-48-24.png


I think this fake news in support of agenda's shows there's a need for a 3rd party neutral media powerhouse. Most likely an online medium. News outlets are changing. Peep this recent report by Forbes HERE

There is a move by a collection of America's newspapers--largely newspapers that is--to seek anti-trust exemption so that they can negotiate as a group against Facebook and Google. The argument is that the two tech firms now dominate the online advertising market and if the newspapers are to survive to produce that democratically important public service journalism then they must be allowed to combine in negotiation.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Appraise.net

We're social

Spaceship
Domain Recover
CatchDoms
DomainEasy — Live Options
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back