The USA Political Thread

[lennco]

Here you can spout your USA political views.

Rules:
1. Keep it clean
2. No fighting
3. Respect the views of others.
4. US Political views, No Religious views
5. Have fun

:wave:

 

[Michael Ehrhardt]

America America ...

 

[Michael Ehrhardt]

 

[mr-x]

Time For Trump To Defund The ‘Hamilton’ Left

In 2009, the NEA was caught soliciting artists... that supported President Obama’s policy agenda. At least seven groups... received arts funding, including Nancy McCullough, Obama’s law school classmate, who received a $50,000 grant.

Under Obama’s reign, groups like San Francisco-based CounterPULSE received $25,000 in federal stimulus funds for a “pansexual performance series” called “Perverts Put Out,” which asks its audience to “Join your fellow pervs for some explicit, twisted fun.”

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2016/11/22/time-for-trump-to-defund-the-hamilton-left/#ixzz4Qugoxtqb

This may not be Trump level corruption but it stinks like a New York City sewer. Thanks Obama.

 

[AGermanGuy]

Quote me or apologize for generalizing and accusing me of being a racist.

Wow, you already forgot what you wrote..

There is no help for you. Enjoy you your anti muslim hate speech, I am done here.

There is no point anymore in argumenting with you. Same with Gilsan.

You can count this as a victory or not, I do not care.

 

[mr-x]

Wow, you already forgot what you wrote..

There is no help for you. Enjoy you your anti muslim hate speech, I am done here.

There is no point anymore in argumenting with you. Same with Gilsan.

You can count this as a victory or not, I do not care.

That answers the question about your honesty. Thanks.

Happy Thanksgiving!

 

[mr-x]

 

[TheBaldOne]

Interesting, on politico.com (http://www.politico.com/story/2016/11/clinton-lead-popular-vote-2016-231790)

"Clinton’s camp and leading Democrats have been entirely silent on the efforts — including a potential request for a recount of Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin sponsored by Green Party candidate Jill Stein — further underscoring the unlikelihood of movement on that front. But left-leaning activists were nonetheless temporarily cheered after New York Magazine reported on Tuesday evening that Clinton’s campaign chairman John Podesta and campaign attorney Marc Elias spoke with a group of election lawyers and computer scientists about the possibility that results may have been altered in those states.


The former secretary of state has garnered 64,223,958 votes, compared to the president-elect’s 62,206,395, according to a count curated by Dave Wasserman of the nonpartisan Cook Political Report.

Among the potential steps to challenge the results on Wednesday was an announcement from Stein, often a strident Clinton critic, that she would seek to challenge the results in all three of the states if she raised the $2 million necessary to do so. Pennsylvania and Wisconsin are traditionally Democrats states that fell into Trump’s column on Nov. 8, and Michigan’s story is similar, though it has yet to be officially called for Trump. As of Thursday mornng, Stein's campaign had raised at least $2.5 million, according to multiple news reports."

The US Presidntial election may yet not be over. Mind you it would have helped if over 41% of Americans had actually bothered to vote at all, even here in the UK we have higher turnouts for our general Elections.

But as a British citizen I have to say it is up to Americans to decide their government (the question though will be asked whether it was the American people or the government and agencies of another country who decided the 2016 election).

Ironic isn't it, the candidate who so often shouted about the election being 'stolen' could be the benefactor of just such an act.

 

[mr-x]

The US Presidntial election may yet not be over. Mind you it would have helped if over 41% of Americans had actually bothered to vote at all, even here in the UK we have higher turnouts for our general Elections.

But as a British citizen I have to say it is up to Americans to decide their government (the question though will be asked whether it was the American people or the government and agencies of another country who decided the 2016 election).

Ironic isn't it, the candidate who so often shouted about the election being 'stolen' could be the benefactor of just such an act.

1) No real evidence. Just assumptions based on general trends made by bitter zealots.

2) Even if the alt-left finds a judge willing to start a constitutional crisis, the RNC lawyers will crush the request.

3) They DNC would have to find a HUGE amount of fraud to reverse the election. More then 50K votes.

4) More likely, Trump would gain votes. Absentee ballots, same day voter registrations, dead people, felons tend to vote democrat. They would be flushed, people would go to jail.

5) Hillary has conceded. America won't accept a recount that delivers the election to democrats.

6) Hard core Trump supporters won't burn down businesses, they'll burn down the Government.

7) The world, especially allies and trading partners better pray this doesn't happen. The markets hate uncertainty and will act accordingly.

 

[mr-x]

Professor cited in report says election results 'probably not' hacked

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/11/election-results-hacked-new-york-magazine-231796

This whole story is being kept alive by dishonest journalist. It's click bait.

 

[mr-x]

Wow, you already forgot what you wrote..

There is no help for you. Enjoy you your anti muslim hate speech, I am done here.

There is no point anymore in argumenting with you. Same with Gilsan.

You can count this as a victory or not, I do not care.

This is what you were looking for:

Insult their prophet or refute their religion and you'll find out how moderate they are. Oh wait you can't b/c you'd be charged with a crime.

This is inflammatory, it's not productive and I apologize for antagonizing you.

It's not racist or bigoted. It does relate my experience living with Muslims from the Middle east.

P.S. We all say stupid stuff. You're just better at it them I am

 

[GILSAN]

BUSTED! Reporters Caught Discussing Whether To "Hiss Or Boo" At Trump's NYT Presser
Donald Trump met with The New York Times brass on Tuesday.

Reporters covered the event from the lobby.

They didn’t know their microphones were on.

Reporter 1: Tommy… Tommy… Tommy… They’re rolling…

Reporter 2: They’re rolling.

Reporter 2: Cheers or Boos from the crowd… What say you guys?

Reporter 3: (Laughter)

Reporter 2: Boo…

Bunch of dipsh*ts. They deserve to be ignored by Trump

 

[GILSAN]

No matter what they say from now on, it's BS.

 

[lennco]

 

[TheBaldOne]

So a question arises, should it be demonstrably shown that another country or agency/ies for another country did in fact corrupt the number of votes for or against the candidates and this altered the outcome of the election would Trump supporters still say the 'so-called' result stands?

(I guess it would be like finding after a verdict had been declared by a jury that had been nobbled in a criminal case to give a verdict either for or against a defendent, should that jurys verdict be accepted?)

 

[AGermanGuy]

That answers the question about your honesty. Thanks.

Happy Thanksgiving!

We do not celebrate Thanksgiving in Europe m8.

This is what you were looking for:


This is inflammatory, it's not productive and I apologize for antagonizing you.

It's not racist or bigoted. It does relate my experience living with Muslims from the Middle east.

P.S. We all say stupid stuff. You're just better at it them I am

This is what I meant with generalizing a whole religion based on your experiences with some of them.

I also do not think Americans are bad just because I had a bad experience with most of them (in real life, i do not mean you or other people in this thread). You can never say that all these people are bad because the ones you met were bad.

Got what I meant?

 

[mr-x]

So a question arises, should it be demonstrably shown that another country or agency/ies for another country did in fact corrupt the number of votes for or against the candidates and this altered the outcome of the election would Trump supporters still say the 'so-called' result stands?

(I guess it would be like finding after a verdict had been declared by a jury that had been nobbled in a criminal case to give a verdict either for or against a defendent, should that jurys verdict be accepted?)

If the results were tampered with ( that's a big if ), I think we would have to have a new election. Who knows!

As I said before, this story is being kept alive by zealots and dishonest journalist. The originators of the story admit they don't believe the results were tampered with.

Jill Stein wants 15 more minutes of fame and fools are happy to give her money for it.

 

[mr-x]

We do not celebrate Thanksgiving in Europe m8.


This is what I meant with generalizing a whole religion based on your experiences with some of them.

I also do not think Americans are bad just because I had a bad experience with most of them (in real life, i do not mean you or other people in this thread). You can never say that all these people are bad because the ones you met were bad.

Got what I meant?

I didn't say all Muslims are bad, I related my experience. My view is supported by empirical evidence of blasphemy laws in countries of the Middle East. Jordan and Egypt are the only open societies I can think of.

 

[mr-x]

Bald Eagle perched on a telephone pole in my backyard... watching over my chickens

 

[TheBaldOne]

If the results were tampered with ( that's a big if ), I think we would have to have a new election. Who knows!

Undoubtedly there will be investigations into possible tampering of the votes, let's see what transpires from them. (It was already found that cyber-attacks had occurred upon the system from one certain country prior to the election. It is therefore an 'if' but not a 'big if'.)

 

[mr-x]