The USA Political Thread

[lennco]

Here you can spout your USA political views.

Rules:
1. Keep it clean
2. No fighting
3. Respect the views of others.
4. US Political views, No Religious views
5. Have fun

:wave:

 

[GILSAN]

Sounds about like the percentage who think Breitbart is mostly bullshit. It's no coincidence the "survey" was conducted and the results released just in time for the March for Life, which will take place in Washington D.C. this afternoon. To know the results were going to be what pro-lifers wanted smacks of a tainted survey.

I like Breitbart because they are not Politically Correct and tell us all the Bullshit the hypocritical Liberals are up.

 

[verbster]

I like Breitbart because they are not Politically Correct and tell us all the Bullshit the hypocritical Liberals are up.

Not being politically correct doesn't mean they are right or even telling the truth. What they are good at is telling you what you want to hear and play on your dislike of people who don't believe the way you do. Like the results of the survey that I wish I had a copy of; I would be willing to bet it's a perfect example of biased questions and answers slanted in favor of pro-life. Speaking of which, it's funny how pro-lifers don't seem to care for the unwanted children they insist a woman must bear and raise once they are born. And they complain about having to support the single mothers on welfare and food stamps, and complain louder when the child grows up fatherless and becomes a criminal or an addict, but still won't allow the birth control to stop this nonsense in the first place.

 

[Domainace]

Verbster, that is a litany of vague charges against the evil and ubiquitous "they." If I may, let me play you for a moment:

1-Give an example of how they play on Gilsan's "dislike of people who don't believe" the way he does. Specific examples please. And how is that different from a liberal network playing on liberal dislike for people who don't believe as they do?

2-Please show me the survey that indicates pro-lifers don't care for children who are born to mothers who don't want them. You are making a blanket statement with nothing at all to back it up. Please note that food stamps and welfare are not recognized by all as "caring for" someone. The current system appears to perpetuate despair.

3-Your last sentence suggests that a good way to rid the world of criminals and drug addicts is to abort them before they are even born. That's a very proactive approach to crime, if somewhat unsettling.

Since black expectant mothers are 5 times more likely to abort their child, there is also an unsettling racial aspect to it. Abortion rights in the US have a rather tawdry link with eugenics.

At the very least, there is a very good case to be made against the morality of abortion. Anyone who has considered abortion and then gone ahead to see wonderful kids born can see that.

And lastly, I think I just put in a backorder for one of your former domains. Thanks!

 

[RogueWriter]

Feds spend $432K on gay app....

Definately, the feds don't have enough money to throw around, we should raise taxes.

 

[RogueWriter]

Speaking of which, it's funny how pro-lifers don't seem to care for the unwanted children they insist a woman must bear and raise once they are born. And they complain about having to support the single mothers on welfare and food stamps, and complain louder when the child grows up fatherless and becomes a criminal or an addict, but still won't allow the birth control to stop this nonsense in the first place.

What as compared to liberals who just want to murder babies.....

 

[GILSAN]

What they are good at is telling you what you want to hear

That's what I've been saying for donkey's years about Liberal media

Speaking of which, it's funny how pro-lifers don't seem to care for the unwanted children they insist a woman must bear and raise once they are born. And they complain about having to support the single mothers on welfare and food stamps, and complain louder when the child grows up fatherless and becomes a criminal or an addict, but still won't allow the birth control to stop this nonsense in the first place.

Liberal Logic »»»» How dare you conservatives allow babies to be born, when there is such a great possibility of them becoming criminals and addicts. How dare you try to take our right to decriminalize murdering inocent babies.

Abortion statistics for the US are truly shocking: 1.2 million a year »» 3.300 a day.... one third of which is African American. That's more than one 9/11 every day

Mind you, in many parts of the world it's even worse than in the US

 

[verbster]

And lastly, I think I just put in a backorder for one of your former domains. Thanks!

I'll get to the list of questions, but for now I'm more interested in which domain you like that I dropped. I've been dropping domains like crazy lately. I guess I should offer them up to see if anyone wants them instead of letting them get snapped up by the registrars. I'm curious which domain it is/was. Shoot me a PM if you would.

 

[GILSAN]

How Japan is fighting back at Jihadi John with MEMES: Images of ISIS executioner cutting kebab meat and posing with a selfie stick go viral as nation shows it won't be silenced over new hostage threat

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ilenced-new-hostage-threat.html#ixzz3PkNcEbvJ

 

[iowadawg]

 

[GILSAN]

Liberal reaction to that:

 

[Kokoro]

(Found somewhere on the net)

I've disconnected my home alarm system and de-registered from the Neighborhood Watch. Now I've got two Pakistani flags raised in the front yard, one at each corner, and the black flag of ISIS in the center.

The local police, sheriff, FBI, CIA, NSA, Homeland Security, Secret Service and other agencies are all watching my house 24/7.

I've never felt safer and I’m saving $79.95 a month.

 

[GILSAN]

State of the Nation

 

[GILSAN]

Bill Maher confronts Howard Dean for his comment that ISIS is "About as Muslim as I Am".

Why is it that it's mostly western liberal idiots that keep telling us that these terrorists don't belong to the Religion of Peace?

 

[Kate]

Religion of Peace ?
Let me think.

In Africa you have the Lord's Resistance Army, that is an extremist Christian paramilitary organization, that has committed lots of killings and human rights abuse. Much like Boko Haram. And it is not new at all.

What about the radical anti-abortion groups setting clinics on fire and assaulting, even killing doctors ? Shouldn't it qualify as Christian terrorism ? I think it should. And we are not talking about uprooted immigrants coming from some backward country far away. We are talking about the USA, a country depicted by some as the greatest country on Earth, a country supposedly made of educated and civilized countrymen. But it has no shortage of religious freaks nonetheless. There is a town called Waco in Texas too.

The Westboro Church, another fine church enjoying the benefits of freedom of speech, that it denies to others. Moderates ?
Speaking of which, they operate a number of websites including this one: http://www.godhatesislam.com/
Hey Gilsan, whaddya think ? Do they belong to a Religion of Peace? Or did they hijack the message ? I really need your insight on this.

The homegrown Islamophobes like Anders Breivik for example, also justify attacks against Islam and Muslims with the need to defend local Christian roots and values.

We could also talk about Jewish violence against Palestinians, in the form of occupation, killings, deportation, arbitrary abuse, deprivation of human rights.

It's strange, but apparently in this day and age terrorism must be perpetrated in the name of Islam to be qualified as such. Boy people have selective memories.

The 'sheeple' focus on a handful of braindead fanatics because they are being brainwashed and have blinders on. The greatest danger to democracy and freedom comes from within, and I mean the extremist parties that gather a very substantial portion of the votes. In my view, and by that measure, the number of extremists (or followers) in European countries typically varies between 5% and 25%, depending on the vote count. To sum up I am more worried about voluntary, collective suicide than terrorism. So should you.

 

[verbster]

Yes, 150 years ago, the Republican party was a great Party. Its members truly acted in the best interests of the country and its citizens and was instrumental in the development of the United States. Lincoln is considered one of the greatest presidents of all time. Things change.

To imply the current Republican party has much in common with the Republicans of the late 1800's would be really stretching it (about as much as claiming today's liberal Democrats are supporters of the Klan). As if it's not obvious, things have changed drastically in the last 50-60 years. For example, while it's true "From 1869 to 1935, every Black elected to congress [25 total] was a Republican," what's not included is what happened after that. In fact, from 1935 to 2015, there have been 111 black Representatives. 104 of 111 are Democrats. The current House of Representatives has 44 Blacks; 43 are Democrats. There are two Black senators . . . one elected Democrat and one appointed Republican.

As for the KKK, it was formed by a group of Confederate soldiers, which is important because the "Democrats" you are describing were mostly Southern State "Democrats". These states are now red Republican states. What else is missing is that after the Klan's formation, both parties had presidents, governors, congressmen and supreme court justices who were Klan members. Also missing is the status of the Klan today, and who its members are. From over 5 million members in 1924, the Klan has diminished to around 7000. It is considered a right wing hate group. (I'm pretty sure you're not going to find any left-wing liberal Democrat members.)

 

[GILSAN]

Religion of Peace ?
Let me think.

In Africa you have the Lord's Resistance Army, that is an extremist Christian paramilitary organization, that has committed lots of killings and human rights abuse. Much like Boko Haram. And it is not new at all.

Ideologically the LRA have a mostly strong belief in African Mysticism and nothing to do with Christianism. The Liberal media likes to paint them as being Christian fundamentalism, but they can only fool some people. Their conflict is mostly ethnic/tribal inside Uganda and some surrounding countries, and very little to do with religion. In fact they've slaughtered Catholics, Protestants, Muslims and non religious people alike. They have about 200-500 followers and are listed as a terrorist group by the USA which is how it should be. Boko Haram on the other hand are pure Islam and their objective is kill non believers and implement Sharia Law in the lands they have conquered by fear and slaughter.

What about the radical anti-abortion groups setting clinics on fire and assaulting, even killing doctors ? Shouldn't it qualify as Christian terrorism ? I think it should.

Being Pro-life and against abortion should be considered as Christian terrorism? 1.2 million babies slaughtered every year in the US alone, one third of which are African American and not one sign saying "Black Lives Matter"

WOW.... you really have a sick mind, by considering the slaughter of babies as being terrorism.

The Westboro Church, another fine church enjoying the benefits of freedom of speech, that it denies to others. Moderates ?
Speaking of which, they operate a number of websites including this one: http://www.godhatesislam.com/
Hey Gilsan, whaddya think ? Do they belong to a Religion of Peace? Or did they hijack the message ? I really need your insight on this.

Westboro Baptist Church
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westboro_Baptist_Church
Members: 39

I always have a good laugh when Liberal loonies give the Westboro Church as a Christian example. They have a staggering 39 members.... WOW!. How many terrorist missions have they carried out so far? How many people have these 39 wackos killed so far?

Don't you have a better example than that? 39 wackos... hahahahahaha

To sum up I am more worried about voluntary, collective suicide than terrorism. So should you.

Sounds like a typical Liberal... more worried about voluntary, collective suicide (whatever that is) than terrorism

I'm more worried about terrorism

 

[Kate]

Ideologically the LRA have a mostly strong belief in African Mysticism and nothing to do with Christianism. The Liberal media likes to paint them as being Christian fundamentalism, but they can only fool some people.

Already moving the goalposts - as expected. Nothing to do with Christianism really ? But on the other hand the terrorists claiming Islamic credentials always are genuine Muslims in your books right ? Double standards anyone ?

In fact yes, they are as close to Christianity as Boko Haram is close to Islam.

Right now, I could grab a gun and shoot some people in the street in the name of Islam or Christianity or whatever. But it's just me. I can make silly statements but I can't speak for hundreds of millions of followers... if you get the point. They won't back me up.

WOW.... you really have a sick mind, by considering the slaughter of babies as being terrorism.

You are so predictable It's not funny anymore.

I always have a good laugh when Liberal loonies give the Westboro Church as a Christian example. They have a staggering 39 members.... WOW!. How many terrorist missions have they carried out so far? How many people have these 39 wackos killed so far?

Huge numbers right. And how many of those so-called 'Muslim' terrorists have hit your country so far ? You see, not so many. You seem to suffer from a siege mentality, like you are surrounded by killers, but so few ever pop out to the foreground. It's a real mystery. The odds of dying in a plane crash or in a lift are significantly higher than being a terrorism casualty.

Sounds like a typical Liberal... more worried about voluntary, collective suicide (whatever that is) than terrorism

I don't care about labels. I am not 'liberal' nor am I 'conservative'. I am not even a US citizen. I am just an independent, free-thinking person. Can you even imagine that ?

 

[GILSAN]

Already moving the goalposts - as expected. Nothing to do with Christianism really ? But on the other hand the terrorists claiming Islamic credentials always are genuine Muslims in your books right ? Double standards anyone ?

In fact yes, they are as close to Christianity as Boko Haram is close to Islam.

When 99.5% of all terrorist activity around the world is perpetrated in the name of Islam or by sympathizers of Islam, there is only one type of person moving the goalposts.... YOU

Right now, I could grab a gun and shoot some people in the street in the name of Islam or Christianity or whatever. But it's just me. I can make silly statements but I can't speak for hundreds of millions of followers... if you get the point.

When 99.5% of the people committing barbaric crimes against innocent people and then shouting out "Allāhu Akbar", who the hell are we supposed to blame... Mother Teresa or Mickey Mouse?

 

[Kate]

I understand you. I am now seeing the light.

Islam is inherently violent.
Christianity on the other hand is inherently peaceful. (Yet if you take the Bible literally... it's not always mild and friendly).

There is no such thing as a Christian terrorist; when a non-Muslim strikes, it's a lone wolf always.
On the other hand there is no such thing as a Muslim lone wolf; a Muslim extremist always represents the whole Islam - period.

Accordingly, the Army of God is not extremist or terrorist in nature, because it is Christian-inspired. They are just a bit radical but it's okay. They are white too.

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2013...ttacks-on-u-s-soil-between-1970-and-2012.html

 

[GILSAN]

I understand you. I am now seeing the light.
Islam is inherently violent.

Good for you!!!

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2013/05/muslims-only-carried-out-2-5-percent-of-terrorist-attacks-on-u-s-soil-between-1970-and-2012.html

That's the biggest load of crap of an article I've ever had the misfortune of partially reading... starting with the chart and the name of the Loonies who compiled it:

"Princeton University’s Loon Watch compiled the following chart from the FBI’s data (as explained below,"

Remember the Fort Hood Massacre and how the Liberal Media and government call it... "Workplace Violence" How Politically Correct of them.

Someday they'll say it was the Latinos or Jews who did it, that's if they don't blame it on "white privilege" first