The USA Political Thread

[lennco]

Here you can spout your USA political views.

Rules:
1. Keep it clean
2. No fighting
3. Respect the views of others.
4. US Political views, No Religious views
5. Have fun

:wave:

 

[verbster]

If you're renting, I'm sure it's in the lease that you pay for all damages and don't necessarily have to ask for permission to install them. On the safe side, I would ask the landlord and get a revamped lease.


It's simple economics that disprove your theory.

You need to recognize sarcasm. He's just trying to have fun with me, but not doing such a good job of it.

 

[N-A]

You think people on minimum wage own homes?

Let me take a liberal approach and pull crap out of my butt (like you've been doing) and imply that you were saying that if someone on minimum wage; if it were to increase, would able to own a home.

I understand now he's being sarcastic and finally got the jokes.

 

[GILSAN]

 

[verbster]

Let me take a liberal approach and pull crap out of my butt (like you've been doing) and imply that you were saying that if someone on minimum wage; if it were to increase, would able to own a home.

And once again, your inference would be wrong.

 

[N-A]

And once again, your inference would be wrong.

So what is your overall vision of a higher minimum wage might I ask? And can I get a straight answer? Will it fix income inequality? Will it lower the unemployment rate? Will it give homeless a chance? Will it fix the poverty levels? Etc.?

 

[Theo Goodman]

It will delay a crash in the economy for x months and get the democrats some votes. From a short term perspecitve if I am interested in 4 year plans and holding up a flawed system then it is great.

 

[N-A]

It will delay a crash in the economy for x months and get the democrats some votes. From a short term perspecitve if I am interested in 4 year plans and holding up a flawed system then it is great.

I would still say 4 years is still short term. The bubble is gonna pop one way or another. When it does, the longer you prolong blowing of the bubble, the larger effects it will have on everyone (but the rich).

We need to have a solid decade+ deal.

 

[Theo Goodman]

I agree that 4 years is short term. We do not need to ask the manager for a new hamburger, we need a whole new restaurant

 

[GILSAN]

Tesco apologizes after Muslim checkout worker refused to sell customer ham and wine because it was Ramadan

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-customer-ham-wine-Ramadan.html#ixzz37ghNRarK

Tesco may have apologized but didn't fire the guy. I'll bet if a Christian checkout worker had refused to sell a Halal product to a customer he/she would have been fired on the spot.

 

[iowadawg]

Interesting reading here.

 

[Theo Goodman]

Tesco apologizes after Muslim checkout worker refused to sell customer ham and wine because it was Ramadan

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-customer-ham-wine-Ramadan.html#ixzz37ghNRarK

Tesco may have apologized but didn't fire the guy. I'll bet if a Christian checkout worker had refused to sell a Halal product to a customer he/she would have been fired on the spot.

Are Halal products against Christianity? Are Halal products against some kind of rules in Christianity? Not that I think it is ok though.

 

[Theo Goodman]

but but the "debunkers" like to use wiki , oh no

 

[JB Lions]

but but the "debunkers" like to use wiki , oh no

Much better using blogger sites written up by nuts. Wikipedia is very accurate. Past study has shown about as accurate and the regular encylopedias most people have grown up with. Wrong information usually gets corrected. Sources are listed etc. Nuts don't like dubunkers, because reality is not their friend.

And btw, the source you like to use, the woman in that video:

“I’ve researched it for three years and every single thing that I uncover solidifies my belief that it was an inside job and that our government was complicit in what happened.”

One of those 9/11 truthers. So I can see why you like her. Conspiracy types/nuts, like to get their info from other conspiracy types/nuts. Last thing they want to read is factual type information, which would just tear their little nutty world apart.

 

[Theo Goodman]

What blogger sites written by nuts are you exactly talking about?Why is it that "debunkers" like to use insults to help "debunk" things. There is more than one documented case of goverment IP addresses editing wiki, but of course "debunkers" will shrug this off. Rather we should believe the all knowning "debunkers" since they do not debunk according to opinon but rather objective thought, and .........wiki. Which is fine, but keep in mind in cases, for example snowden , wiki was edit from a goverment ip, what a great source for debunking !

 

[JB Lions]

Why is it that "debunkers" like to use insults to help "debunk" things. !

They don't, they usually use these little things called facts. Ex. all that 9/11 truther nonsense, some I believe we touched on in the past. The debunk sites just take apart the truther stuff.

Do you believe 9/11 was an inside job? That the U.S. government was complicit in it?

 

[Theo Goodman]

You just insulted "random blogs" as being "nuts"
"truther nonsense" like questioning ANYTHING to do with 911 whatsoever? Yes we touched on that, mention 911 - automatic consipracy theorist.

Define "inside job"

 

[JB Lions]

You just insulted "random blogs" as being "nuts"
"truther nonsense" like questioning ANYTHING to do with 911 whatsoever? Yes we touched on that, mention 911 - automatic consipracy theorist.

Define "inside job"

You know what inside job means, what that woman in the video thinks. You also know how to use a dictionary.

And yes it is conspiracy theory when it's been taken apart by facts. Once that happens, for people to still go on about it, nuts.

 

[Theo Goodman]

You know what inside job means, what that woman in the video thinks. You also know how to use a dictionary.

And yes it is conspiracy theory when it's been taken apart by facts. Once that happens, for people to still go on about it, nuts.

You mean that women in the video that you insulted in the past by calling her a "Truther Chick"?

No, this needs to be clear. In your words please define inside job. You are asking a direct question, it makes not sense if we do not agree on what it means.

"And yes it is conspiracy theory when it's been taken apart by facts. Once that happens, for people to still go on about it, nuts."

Again, what exactly are you talking about "it"

You mean like how people go on about how the govement pays trolls and edits wiki, and then it comes out to be true?

 

[JB Lions]

You mean that women in the video that you insulted in the past by calling her a "Truther Chick"?

No, this needs to be clear. In your words please define inside job. You are asking a direct question, it makes not sense if we do not agree on what it means.

"And yes it is conspiracy theory when it's been taken apart by facts. Once that happens, for people to still go on about it, nuts."

Again, what exactly are you talking about "it"

You mean like how people go on about how the govement pays trolls and edits wiki, and then it comes out to be true?

Use her definition. Simple question, do you agree with her?

To 9/11 she said:

“I’ve researched it for three years and every single thing that I uncover solidifies my belief that it was an inside job and that our government was complicit in what happened.”

Do you agree? Stop trying to act like you don't know what that means to avoid the question. Not going to keep going back and forth with you ducking it.

And you did it again, just saw your response below.

It's a simple question if you believe, like her, that 9/11 was an inside job. You've done nothing but duck it.

 

[Theo Goodman]

Agree with her about what exactly? I dont agree with anyone 100%. Please define exactly what you are asking. For a debunker fan this should be easy.