That was a dumb reply, she had a job. And she's making money with the book and appearances today.
This happened in 1978 when she was an administrator at a hospital taking classes.
haha, thanks for backing me up. Like I said, she had a job. And I'm not sure how you pay people off with a volunteer position.
The actions she took after the incident is more likely:
a. rape
b. consensual sex - that's the correct answer.
Then, you make stuff up:
What DNA?
What injuries?
What witnesses?
And again, you never directly answered any of this:
So Bill Clinton, with all his political ambition, raped a woman in a hotel full of reporters. Got up, said put some ice on it, put on his sunglasses and left the room.
"Her story circulated in Arkansas for years and when Bill Clinton ran for president in 1992, his enemies tried to get her to tell the world. She refused. Five years later, she opened her door to find private investigators representing Paula Jones. Still, she would not talk. "I wouldn't relive it for anything," she told them."
"When Jones's attorneys first subpoenaed her in their sexual harassment lawsuit against the president, Broaddrick swore out an affidavit and testified in a deposition that Clinton did not make unwelcome sexual advances toward her in the late 1970s."
"In "The Hunting of the President," Joe Conason and Gene Lyons describe the concerns over Broaddrick's witnesses. Two were sisters enraged that Clinton had commuted the death sentence of their father's convicted killer. A third was the man with whom Broaddrick was having an affair at the time, a man she later married."
"Another woman insisted she had seen her friend's swollen lip and torn pantyhose the day of the alleged crime. But Broaddrick's then-husband said he had not noticed an injury. Nor did he recall her telling him about the incident as she said she had." oops
The Bill Clinton rape story is basically what she does for a living nowadays. Her actions, witnesses say otherwise.