NameSilo
SpaceshipSpaceship
Watch

InvisionTech

Established Member
Impact
133
It seems .PRO is slowly coming out of the cage with cheaper reg prices than they were a year ago and major registrars like netsol taking notice of the extension and promoting it. B-)

Here are some that I picked up in last couple of days:

Alexandria.pro

Anchorage.pro

Arlington.pro

Belfast.pro

Birmingham.pro

Budapest.pro

Durham.pro

Fairfax.pro

Italian.pro

Lisbon.pro

Fire away with your regs after the relaunch on September 8th, 2008.
 
3
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
GoDaddyGoDaddy
By the way how do you guys appraise your .pro domain ?
 
0
•••
beljf123 said:
By the way how do you guys appraise your .pro domain ?

Say I was appraising Surf.pro, I would go to Google and put in;

SurfPro - This would help me gauge the association between Surf and Pro. There are 136,000 indexed pages with Surf and Pro together. That's pretty good.

ProSurf - Same as above but different way round. Not as relevant as the above but still useful. 563,000 indexed results so an even stronger association this way round. The average is only 20,000-30,000 for these 2 tests.

"Professional Surfer" - With quotes. This gauges the level of professional association with what I would describe as the "full" keyword Surfer. It comes up with 77,000. Not bad, there are stronger category associations, for example "Professional Chef" has over 500,000 and Chef.pro sold for $3,650. "Professional Golfer" has 300,000. 77,000 is OK.

Surf Vs Surf Pro Vs Surf Professional - I like to compare the Google uniques for the keyword on it's own versus with Pro and with Professional. I'm interested in the ratios. For example, Surf has 111m uniques, 3m for Surf Pro, and 12m for Surf Professional. They are good numbers, especially if you bear in mind that some meanings of surf (eg. Surf the Internet, Surf & Turf) don't have a professional context and are dragging down the pro and professional ratios. It's another gauge of pro and professional association.

allinurl:surf - This tell me how popular a keyword is in developed web site URL's. There are 4.5m pages with Surf in the address. That's about double skate, which is what I would expect. Surf has a useful double meaning, Surfing a wave and surfing the Internet. That is probably boosting the URL result which is a good thing. I like keywords with double meanings, it means you are buying 2 domains for the price of 1. For example, I bought Pool.pro a couple of weeks ago. That could be pool as in the game or a swimming pool.

allinurl:surf.com - Similar to above but I'm trying to cut out URL's where the surf is after the .com as a folder or page reference. About 285,000 results, again not bad. You have be careful that there isn't a page heavy .com site developed because that will skew the result. For example allinurl: overstock.com comes out with 3.4m results but if you look at the results it's picking up mostly Overstock.com pages. Rather than create their pages on the fly from a database, they seem to have them all hard coded or set up as subdomains and Google indexes them separately. Just because this figure is low, doesn't mean the keyword isn't valuable. For example, when I bought Diamond.pro, I found Diamond had a relatively modest 90,000 Google indexed results for allinurl: Diamond.com but that's probably because not everybody can set up a website selling diamonds, it must be expensive to buy the stock and the wholesale diamond market is relatively small and close-knit.

These allinurl stats help me gauge how much competition there is for a keyword. The more competition, the better. It means there won't be many strong .coms around at reasonable prices, people will be developing weaker 2 and 3 word .coms, and they are more likely to consider strong generic alternatives.

Also, from a development angle it helps. For example, there are 5.6m indexed page references with Guide.com in and 420,000 with Guide.info in, end users will be familiar with these types of sites being developed on alternative extensions and won't be phased by it. This was a concern for me when I bought Diamond.pro, I figured there were alot of good diamond.com sites unregged or for sale because of the low allinurl: diamond.com figure. It also made me wonder whether end users would accept a diamond site on .pro because there will have been little spillover into alternatives and you need credibility to sell a diamond online because of the cost and emotional significance of the purchase. I still bought it, I figured .pro sounds more credible than alot of other alternatives so if credibility is a consideration, I should go for it.

As well as just the Google indexed page results, I'm also interested in the quality of the sites on the first couple of pages, the number of sponsored ads, and the strength of the site names. Site name strength is a double edged sword, it could mean developers and end users prefer single generic names, or if the names are weak, it might mean that you don't need a strong URL in that particular field, or at least developers don't think they do, which will make a sale in .pro less likely. Or it might mean there is mileage in combining the SEO and site design quality with a more brandable and memorable name.

One of my considerations when I bought Rates.info was that the biggest players in the UK comparison market; MoneySupermarket.com, CompareTheMarket.com, and MoneySavingExpert.com have weak .com names. For a new entrant, Rates.info would arguably be more memorable and save users typing up to 11 letters. On the flipside, it could mean provided you have the lowest unbiased rates, people don't care about the name. Again, that could still work for an alternative extension like .info.

Next I would compare results from Estibot.com and DomainScore.com. I don't have a conventional PPC Overture .com domainer mindset so this helps me see things as a .com domainer might. My focus has always been on alternatives so I attach more weight to goodness of fit. Fit isn't an issue with .com, domainers are focused on the weight of the keyword only. I put little reliance on auto valuation tool absolute valuations but they can be brilliant at benchmarking. For example, Estibot values Surf.pro at $1,300 and Skate.pro at $650. Surf.pro cost me about twice what Skate.pro cost so that's pretty accurate benchmarking. I think Estibot works better for .coms than alternatives in terms of absolute value because .com values derive from the keyword alone.

Domainscore is similar to Estibot apart from you get an indexed relative valuation. Surf.pro scores 478 versus 457 for Skate.pro. Again, that backs up my view that Surf.pro is stronger than Skate.pro.

Another tool I use is a keyword list. It has 17,500 popular keywords on and has PPC and Overture type benchmarks. Again, it's just a benchmarking exercise, I often look at where the keyword ranks out of 17,500 for PPC and Overture. For example, Skate and Surf are ranked between 1,500-2,000 for Overture. That would suggest that if you were regging based on Overture they should be in the first 1,500-2,000 .pros regged. They were regged on 2 March 2005 so they probably were in the first 1,500-2,000 .pros regged so that's pretty accurate.

Next, I like to look at keyword bids on Sedo and historic sale prices on dnsaleprice.com or namebio.com. If the .biz is for sale on Sedo, I like to see alot of bids on it, I think there are some parallels between what works in .biz and what works in .pro for business and employment related keywords. I don't think there is the same parallel for sports and hobbies. Surf.mobi has 11 bids, that was a positive, especially because I think Surf works better with .pro than .mobi. The only point to bear in mind here is that the 11 bids might all be at $200 or something with no bids like Quotes.com has no bids because the seller has set a huge minimum bid and nobody has bid over it, I'm using this as an example because I heard the seller wants $10m for it.

For historical prices, I'm interested in how many times the keyword has sold on it's own in alternative extensions. I also like to see weak 2-3 word .coms containing the keyword selling for alot of money (eg. BlogSurf.com $19,873). Also, I like to see the word selling for alot of money in .com, that means the .com is out of the game permanently so anybody who wants the keyword will have to buy it in an alternative. Volume of historical sales is also very important, I like keywords which have pages and pages of historical sales, ideally with some in alternative extensions.

Finally, I consider the domain as a whole, focusing on general fit between the keyword and .pro extension, commercial use and wow factor. For Surf.pro you have the sport and hobby angle which works very well with .pro, Surf.pro could sell boards, accessories, or holidays, which are relatively high value items with a nice margin from a business angle. Finally, wow factor, I know .com domainers will laugh at me talking about wow factor in the context of .pro, but it makes the difference between an average sale and a premium sale. For alternative extensions like .pro, wow factor is a combination of goodness of fit and commercial attractiveness. The biggest wow factor .pro domains are Golf.pro and Poker.pro. Surf.pro and Skate.pro aren't in the same league but they have a wow factor.
 
Last edited:
3
•••
As Andrew could likely write the textbook on appraisals, I don't want to waste time on matters upon which we agree. Suffice to say, an intelligent, thoughtful analysis is as much as anyone can ask for. I would only add that at the end of the day, you need to be comfortable with the numbers. I recently rejected an offer to sell network.pro for 2k. I have a 2005 Afternic appraisal for the domain that places its current market value exactly at the offer price, and access to a subsequent Afternic appraisal for "network.ms", that puts the CMV at 1.1k. Moreover, my dad, who tends to hold opinions consistent with the mainstream, Columbus, Ohio crowd, if you will, hates the name. Nonetheless, a gut check sent me searching for rationale not to sell the domain for under 5k. I'm a huge believer in listening to that part of the brain that tends to show up without an appointment, often at less than convenient times. I'm speaking, of course, of intuition. Intuition, I believe, is a classic example of where a human being is greater than the sum of its parts. At the very least, always offer it a vote at the table, even if it has trouble finding its way to the first few meetings. But you'll soon find that the more you tune in, the stronger the signal. Finally, ignore your intuition at your own peril. Go PRO!
 
1
•••
Nice appraisal explaination Campbell. This doesn't only work for .pro, but just about any name. Thanks for writing it all out. There is some stuff that I missed.
 
0
•••
MJS, I think you did the right thing not selling Network.pro for $2,000. $5,000 and maybe I would consider it. "Network professional" has 700,000 Google uniques and "Professional network" has 1.8m. Chef.pro sold for $3,650 and Network.pro has a stronger professional association.

The problem with your .pro collection is your have so much strength and depth in keyword quality it must be difficult to part with anything. It's a bit like owning a company and selling stock in it, if you believe in the company you don't want to reduce your shareholding. You are the de Beers of .pro domains!:) You can pretty much set the price super premium .pros sell for.

I imagine you have to be mindful of reg fees but I would stick to selling strong keywords with OK but not spectacular extension fit. My other maxim is sell your best domains last. That way, if it turns out you were right, your pay days get bigger and bigger and you won't regret the small profits you took along the way.
 
0
•••
Thank you for your appraisal guide ak :)

Very well explained.
 
0
•••
Thats probably the best 'how to do an appraisal' guide on NamePros.

Pretty much breaks it down for the general populace.

Well done akcampbell - rep left :tu:
 
0
•••
Hi

I saw a few appraisals in the appraisals section and I felt. It is just one's perception towards the domain. IMHO Appraisals are always correct while after decision of the individual working on the research.

All the Best.

sundari.
 
0
•••
akcampbell said:
Say I was appraising Surf.pro, I would go to Google and put in;

SurfPro - This would help me gauge the association between Surf and Pro. There are 136,000 indexed pages with Surf and Pro together. That's pretty good.

ProSurf - Same as above but different way round. Not as relevant as the above but still useful. 563,000 indexed results so an even stronger association this way round. The average is only 20,000-30,000 for these 2 tests.

"Professional Surfer" - With quotes. This gauges the level of professional association with what I would describe as the "full" keyword Surfer. It comes up with 77,000. Not bad, there are stronger category associations, for example "Professional Chef" has over 500,000 and Chef.pro sold for $3,650. "Professional Golfer" has 300,000. 77,000 is OK.

Surf Vs Surf Pro Vs Surf Professional - I like to compare the Google uniques for the keyword on it's own versus with Pro and with Professional. I'm interested in the ratios. For example, Surf has 111m uniques, 3m for Surf Pro, and 12m for Surf Professional. They are good numbers, especially if you bear in mind that some meanings of surf (eg. Surf the Internet, Surf & Turf) don't have a professional context and are dragging down the pro and professional ratios. It's another gauge of pro and professional association.

allinurl:surf - This tell me how popular a keyword is in developed web site URL's. There are 4.5m pages with Surf in the address. That's about double skate, which is what I would expect. Surf has a useful double meaning, Surfing a wave and surfing the Internet. That is probably boosting the URL result which is a good thing. I like keywords with double meanings, it means you are buying 2 domains for the price of 1. For example, I bought Pool.pro a couple of weeks ago. That could be pool as in the game or a swimming pool.

allinurl:surf.com - Similar to above but I'm trying to cut out URL's where the surf is after the .com as a folder or page reference. About 285,000 results, again not bad. You have be careful that there isn't a page heavy .com site developed because that will skew the result. For example allinurl: overstock.com comes out with 3.4m results but if you look at the results it's picking up mostly Overstock.com pages. Rather than create their pages on the fly from a database, they seem to have them all hard coded or set up as subdomains and Google indexes them separately. Just because this figure is low, doesn't mean the keyword isn't valuable. For example, when I bought Diamond.pro, I found Diamond had a relatively modest 90,000 Google indexed results for allinurl: Diamond.com but that's probably because not everybody can set up a website selling diamonds, it must be expensive to buy the stock and the wholesale diamond market is relatively small and close-knit.

These allinurl stats help me gauge how much competition there is for a keyword. The more competition, the better. It means there won't be many strong .coms around at reasonable prices, people will be developing weaker 2 and 3 word .coms, and they are more likely to consider strong generic alternatives.

Also, from a development angle it helps. For example, there are 5.6m indexed page references with Guide.com in and 420,000 with Guide.info in, end users will be familiar with these types of sites being developed on alternative extensions and won't be phased by it. This was a concern for me when I bought Diamond.pro, I figured there were alot of good diamond.com sites unregged or for sale because of the low allinurl: diamond.com figure. It also made me wonder whether end users would accept a diamond site on .pro because there will have been little spillover into alternatives and you need credibility to sell a diamond online because of the cost and emotional significance of the purchase. I still bought it, I figured .pro sounds more credible than alot of other alternatives so if credibility is a consideration, I should go for it.

As well as just the Google indexed page results, I'm also interested in the quality of the sites on the first couple of pages, the number of sponsored ads, and the strength of the site names. Site name strength is a double edged sword, it could mean developers and end users prefer single generic names, or if the names are weak, it might mean that you don't need a strong URL in that particular field, or at least developers don't think they do, which will make a sale in .pro less likely. Or it might mean there is mileage in combining the SEO and site design quality with a more brandable and memorable name.

One of my considerations when I bought Rates.info was that the biggest players in the UK comparison market; MoneySupermarket.com, CompareTheMarket.com, and MoneySavingExpert.com have weak .com names. For a new entrant, Rates.info would arguably be more memorable and save users typing up to 11 letters. On the flipside, it could mean provided you have the lowest unbiased rates, people don't care about the name. Again, that could still work for an alternative extension like .info.

Next I would compare results from Estibot.com and DomainScore.com. I don't have a conventional PPC Overture .com domainer mindset so this helps me see things as a .com domainer might. My focus has always been on alternatives so I attach more weight to goodness of fit. Fit isn't an issue with .com, domainers are focused on the weight of the keyword only. I put little reliance on auto valuation tool absolute valuations but they can be brilliant at benchmarking. For example, Estibot values Surf.pro at $1,300 and Skate.pro at $650. Surf.pro cost me about twice what Skate.pro cost so that's pretty accurate benchmarking. I think Estibot works better for .coms than alternatives in terms of absolute value because .com values derive from the keyword alone.

Domainscore is similar to Estibot apart from you get an indexed relative valuation. Surf.pro scores 478 versus 457 for Skate.pro. Again, that backs up my view that Surf.pro is stronger than Skate.pro.

Another tool I use is a keyword list. It has 17,500 popular keywords on and has PPC and Overture type benchmarks. Again, it's just a benchmarking exercise, I often look at where the keyword ranks out of 17,500 for PPC and Overture. For example, Skate and Surf are ranked between 1,500-2,000 for Overture. That would suggest that if you were regging based on Overture they should be in the first 1,500-2,000 .pros regged. They were regged on 2 March 2005 so they probably were in the first 1,500-2,000 .pros regged so that's pretty accurate.

Next, I like to look at keyword bids on Sedo and historic sale prices on dnsaleprice.com or namebio.com. If the .biz is for sale on Sedo, I like to see alot of bids on it, I think there are some parallels between what works in .biz and what works in .pro for business and employment related keywords. I don't think there is the same parallel for sports and hobbies. Surf.mobi has 11 bids, that was a positive, especially because I think Surf works better with .pro than .mobi. The only point to bear in mind here is that the 11 bids might all be at $200 or something with no bids like Quotes.com has no bids because the seller has set a huge minimum bid and nobody has bid over it, I'm using this as an example because I heard the seller wants $10m for it.

For historical prices, I'm interested in how many times the keyword has sold on it's own in alternative extensions. I also like to see weak 2-3 word .coms containing the keyword selling for alot of money (eg. BlogSurf.com $19,873). Also, I like to see the word selling for alot of money in .com, that means the .com is out of the game permanently so anybody who wants the keyword will have to buy it in an alternative. Volume of historical sales is also very important, I like keywords which have pages and pages of historical sales, ideally with some in alternative extensions.

Finally, I consider the domain as a whole, focusing on general fit between the keyword and .pro extension, commercial use and wow factor. For Surf.pro you have the sport and hobby angle which works very well with .pro, Surf.pro could sell boards, accessories, or holidays, which are relatively high value items with a nice margin from a business angle. Finally, wow factor, I know .com domainers will laugh at me talking about wow factor in the context of .pro, but it makes the difference between an average sale and a premium sale. For alternative extensions like .pro, wow factor is a combination of goodness of fit and commercial attractiveness. The biggest wow factor .pro domains are Golf.pro and Poker.pro. Surf.pro and Skate.pro aren't in the same league but they have a wow factor.

Excellent and very informative!

Rep added.
 
0
•••
.tv said:
Excellent and very informative!

Rep added.

agreed - nice post

:)
 
0
•••
Cheers Andrew agree with the others great post and given me points to improve my domain choices.

Samit: Cheers for you explaination also re: thegame dot pro. I see where you are coming from now. I had thought it was something todo with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Game_(mind_game). As for the names I put up I agree, feel the hike/walk.pro would be great if developed into a db of walks/hikes all round the world. But thats why I did not take them.
And nope I get no ppc on the few .pro s I have which I picked for either resale or development at some stage.

I do wonder if these keyword.pros that have been sold recently such as perfume*pro (for selling perfume) or outside*pro (selling equipement for use outdoors...(outdoor was taken but has disambiguation with outdoors)
would be suitable for drop ship enterprises/online retail as the .pro makes it sound like your site is the professional retail solution for the keyword rather than a .biz (which I would be wary to buy from). This obviously would only be preferable (from a leakage POV) when the .org,net,com have been taken (which they have).
Does anyone else have any thoughts on this?
 
0
•••
I think that these names are perfect for an online retailer. For example, check out:

http://www.mirrors.pro/
http://www.waterfilter.pro/
http://www.kite.pro/
http://www.motorcycles.pro/
http://wildlife.pro/

Perfume.pro would be an ideal name for a perfume e-commerce site.

siga said:
Cheers Andrew agree with the others great post and given me points to improve my domain choices.

Samit: Cheers for you explaination also re: thegame dot pro. I see where you are coming from now. I had thought it was something todo with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Game_(mind_game). As for the names I put up I agree, feel the hike/walk.pro would be great if developed into a db of walks/hikes all round the world. But thats why I did not take them.
And nope I get no ppc on the few .pro s I have which I picked for either resale or development at some stage.

I do wonder if these keyword.pros that have been sold recently such as perfume*pro (for selling perfume) or outside*pro (selling equipement for use outdoors...(outdoor was taken but has disambiguation with outdoors)
would be suitable for drop ship enterprises/online retail as the .pro makes it sound like your site is the professional retail solution for the keyword rather than a .biz (which I would be wary to buy from). This obviously would only be preferable (from a leakage POV) when the .org,net,com have been taken (which they have).
Does anyone else have any thoughts on this?
 
0
•••
0
•••
cdboard said:
fwiw, it appears that four out of five of those domains are still with Encirca's proforwarding service.

I don't think you need to change to the new system until the current registration period for the domain has expired - though they are encouraging everyone to switch over by Feb. 15th 2009. Here is an excerpt from an email from Encirca explaining their policy:

In order to minimize any disruption to existing .pro customers,
EnCirca and RegistryPro have been discussing how best to migrate all
of the ProForwarding customers to comply with the new .pro use policies.

EnCirca has agreed to encourage customers to complete this
migration by February 15, 2009.

What does it cost to Migrate?
There is no cost to migrate.

How do I Migrate?
The first step required to migrate from the ProForwarding service is
to submit professional license credentials to the .pro registry. All
of you have been receiving emails from EnCirca and RegistryPro
containing a link to the Auto-Verification form. Completion of this
form will update your Admin Whois contact as verified for .pro domains.

Once you complete this step, then you can update the Registrant Whois
contact for your .pro domains with your Admin Whois contact and the
migration is complete.

What needs to be provided on the Auto-Verification form?

You need to provide the following information on the Auto-Verification form:

First Name (or company/organization):
Last Name (or company/organization):
Date of Licensure: (optional)
Type of Profession:
Jurisdiction Country:
Licensing Authority:
License Number:
Licensing Authority Website:


What if I, or my business, do not have a professional license?
The individual providing license credentials does not need to be the
same person listed as the Registrant in the Whois database for the .pro
domain name.

The .pro registry also recognizes that businesses themselves are not
necessarily issued professional licenses. The license may be provided
by anyone associated with the company, including staff and consultants
such as lawyers and accountants.

As long as the individual providing the license credentials agrees to
adhere to the new .pro Terms of Service policy for your domain name,
their credentials can be used.

What happens if I do not migrate by February 15, 2009?
If you do not complete the migration by February 15, 2009, EnCirca
will protect your ProForwarding domains by moving them into a special
account for the duration of their registration term. This will help
avoid loss of the domain due to a Registry audit.

Domains in this special ProForwarding account may not resolve in the
DNS, be renewed, or be transferred to another Registrar until the owner
has completed the .pro verification process with EnCirca and RegistryPro.

At any time while a domain is in this special account, you may request
to Restore the domain name after completing the .pro Auto-Verification
process. You may also request to transfer the domain to another
EnCirca customer account, provided the new owner has completed the .pro
verification process with EnCirca. There is no charge for these requests.

EnCirca will continue will maintain all ProForwarding domains until
their expiration date and will prevent possible hijacking by processing
Restore requests solely from the customer-of-record for the domain.
 
0
•••
yeah, I got that, too. I still had some .PRO's under their old system.

did you notice this part? you may not have to change, but the domains may not "work".

Domains in this special ProForwarding account may not resolve in the
DNS, be renewed, or be transferred to another Registrar until the owner
has completed the .pro verification process with EnCirca and RegistryPro.
 
0
•••
0
•••
0
•••
Dear .Pro friends,

Happy New 2009 year!

May all your wishes come true!


Kind regards,
MG.
 
0
•••
0
•••
Just regged tonight : icecream.pro

19.99$ at domainpeople.
 
0
•••
Dynadot — .com TransferDynadot — .com Transfer
Appraise.net

We're social

Escrow.com
Spaceship
Rexus Domain
CryptoExchange.com
Domain Recover
CatchDoms
DomDB
NameFit
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back