The Next Big Domain - A Web 2.0 Thread

[lexisdomains]

The next BIG domain ....-
Google , Bing, Zoosk, Twitter,, Groupon​

Do you think that Web 2.0 domain brands have any real value? & Feel free to show case your best Web 2.0 (or hybrid descriptor name)

---------- Post added at 05:39 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:37 PM ----------

Ps: I think I may have found the next Twitter Name!....

 

[JTFranklin]

I think the next name for anything good should be Fritey Mitey!

 

[~ The 34 Year Buzz!!]

The Next Big Domain - A Web 2.0 Thread...

Did (or did not) Web 2.0 Mania peak-out almost three years ago?

Keep A Step Ahead presents:

• The SEMANTIC Web :bingo:

^^^

Feel free to show case your best Web 2.0 (or hybrid descriptor name)
Thanks lexis, I might pop back later to do that...

^^^

Do you think that Web 2.0 domain brands have any real value?
Developed = Yes
Parked = "You might get lucky," IMO.

 

[JTFranklin]

symbiotic name. Would suffice

 

[Kassey Lee]

What is Web 2.0, if I may ask? I'm not even aware of Web 1.0, if it exists.

 

[lothos]

What is Web 2.0, if I may ask? I'm not even aware of Web 1.0, if it exists.

Web 2.0 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[Kassey Lee]

I got it finally. Thanks.

 

[FanCube]

Sure good Web 2.0 domains have value, but we should not forget that what makes a Web 2.0 service successful is still the service itself. Even a very catchy domain cannot save a Web 2.0 service not getting much interest. A classic example is del.icio.us (even that they now operate from delicious.com)

 

[malcarada]

Web2.0 is over, I see no value there. Just get a brandable name for anything, Web2.0 or fried potatoes, it can make you money.

 

[the_poet]

I agree with malcarada

 

[DubDubDubDot]

This thread is probably better suited for 2003 than 2010. In that timespan, literally thousands of sites with web 2.0 style names have launched. This was a product of VC money drying up and the startup's inability to buy good keyword domains. We are long past the critical mass of 5, 6, 7 letter brandabale domain building. Plus, over the past year I have noticed more startups using pretty good keyword domains than in previous years. Though that is probably an effect of a sagging domain market and the startups getting good prices.

In any event, you can't dispute the power of the pure brandable.... but this is a very difficult market for domainers to corner since there is too much ground to cover. A buyout or anything close to it is impossible.

 

[VURG]

Time for web 3.0

 

[DnEbook]

Time for web 3.0

please define what a web 3 site will do and look like ?

 

[VURG]

please define what a web 3 site will do and look like ?

With pleasure!

Web 2.0 with smarter accountability.

I just bought onlinedebating.org as I think that it will be very useful for starting a not-for-profit project teaching people to debate online. Most people are crap at it. Debating clubs are horrible as well because they use formal debating strategies that are useless online.

I believe that online debating is a huge growth industry.

Why?

Target advertising by opinions, not keywords.

Political Campaigns have a very low budget online as they don't know how to do it. I think that in around 5 years they will.

The Namepros environment taught me how to argue well online. Most people I know don't know how to make money by arguing.

I think the forum format sucks bigtime as a debating format. Somebody has to invent a new format. There are probably geeks who will.

 

[DnEbook]

i thought you might say 3d content or more videocentric , unsure if a forum is just for debating ? but in a world of reality tv live debates may do ok , after all we got so much out of julia and tonys great debate (just joking) !

 

[WordWalker]

Web 3.0?

Look no further! :imho:

---------- Post added at 07:44 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:54 PM ----------

Political Campaigns have a very low budget online as they don't know how to do it.

This site does.

 

[cache]

what are examples of web 3.0 names?

 

[follatpo]

Time for web 3.0

may be 4.0 5.0

 

[VURG]

Web 3.0?

Look no further! :imho:

---------- Post added at 07:44 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:54 PM ----------



This site does.

Thanks for the link. I'm skeptical with this site atm. I think that these guys aren't thinking big enough. Maybe I'm wrong. I think that online debating is like video online services. Lots of people try. Lots of people fail but there will be some clear winners in the long term.

 

[GreenGambler]

may be 4.0 5.0

lol, by then maybe it wont even be called the web..