Domain Empire

new gTLD Sold new gtld domain to a .com owner.

Spaceship Spaceship
Watch

blockchain

Established Member
Impact
156
0
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
sorry NDA..

Classic. Some sale with no details subject to an NDA.

I have sold well over 1000 domains over the years from 3 figures to 6 figures.
In all these sales I have signed like 2-3 NDA. It is amazing how so many reported sales without details are subject to an NDA.

People don't request an NDA for a 3 figure sale. :facepalm:

Brad
 
Last edited:
30
•••
Well done
Pointless thread without sharing the domain?
 
14
•••
14
•••
Wow 3 figure nda, from now on I will consider any comments you make total bs.

Maybe if you were smart, and they really wanted a nda you could have gotten 4 figures,

Someone please delete this worthless thread, it is a waste of bandwidth.
 
Last edited:
13
•••
lesson learned.. do not report new gtld sales.

No, the lesson is: Don´t report if you can´t give any information about the name and price
 
11
•••
10
•••
comments are hilarious.. there should be more threads like this :-P

btw I sold a random non-pronounceable non-chip LLLL.xyz for $1.. can't reveal the name, sorry, NDA.
 
8
•••
It would caust a legal team x,xxx to draft an NDA for client, which is more they spent on the domain.

Funny thread.
 
8
•••
I’ve done more in sales than Media Options this year. It’s all under NDA though. Sorry folks.
 
7
•••
5
•••
6
•••
Classic. Some sale with no details subject to an NDA.

I have sold well over 1000 domains over the years from 3 figures to 6 figures.
In all these sales I have signed like 2-3 NDA. It is amazing how so many reported sales without details are subject to an NDA.

People don't request an NDA for a 3 figure sale. :facepalm:

Brad

Most ngtld sales claimed are under NDA - Surprise surprise!
 
5
•••
Remember @blockchain that NP folks are dead serious about doing a root cause analysis for every sale :xf.grin:Never report if you can't divulge the details.
Glad you got some attention though, Good Day:xf.smile:
 
Last edited:
5
•••
Do you know the intentions of the purchaser? Like will it become their only main website address, or did they purchase it as a redirect for a particular product or marketing campaign?
 
4
•••
Classic. Some sale with no details subject to an NDA.

I have sold well over 1000 domains over the years from 3 figures to 6 figures.
In all these sales I have signed like 2-3 NDA. It is amazing how so many reported sales without details are subject to an NDA.

People don't request an NDA for a 3 figure sale. :facepalm:

Brad

Maybe it was bought at xxx by a 'middleman' to be 'resold' to the .com owners at xxxxxx! An NDA would make sense in this case. Things happen in this world, you know!
 
3
•••
OR he's saying NDA to avoid revealing any information.
 
3
•••
He just try to bump his domain price currently in auction at NP.
 
2
•••
Congratulations! Can you reveal the amount?
And I guess the name is media.*******, right?
 
2
•••
It would be desirable at least to know extension of the domain if the domain under NDA
In sure it’s a stormy type nda, $1M every time he speaks of it. Let’s not bankrupt this guy over a $100 sale.

The better gtlds have 3 figure renewals, so 3 figure sale is hardly impressive.
 
Last edited:
2
•••
Maybe it was bought at xxx by a 'middleman' to be 'resold' to the .com owners at xxxxxx! An NDA would make sense in this case. Things happen in this world, you know!
Yeah...., 'maybe'! But 'highly' doubtful.
 
1
•••
No, the lesson is: Don´t report if you can´t give any information about the name and price
the name is - new gtld Donuts domain.
the price is mid XXX
 
2
•••
Do you know the intentions of the purchaser? Like will it become their only main website address, or did they purchase it as a redirect for a particular product or marketing campaign?
it's still unused..
 
2
•••
Donuts domain you say?
Interesting.
 
1
•••
I had fun reading the comments. At least that was worth it.....O_o
 
1
•••
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back