Snapnames vs Pool.com

[lincolndsp]

I backordered a domain with Snapnames. But there were some technical problems and I couldn't create a Pool.com account. What's is the probability Snapnames will get it, not Pool.com?

 

[Kate]

Snap is much more effective as a rule. Pool used to work great but that was when. The competition more or less buried them.
Which extension ?

 

[lincolndsp]

Snap is much more effective as a rule. Pool used to work great but that was when. The competition more or less buried them.
Which extension ?

Thanks, Kate! the extension is .com.
When I searched Google, all comparisons where back in 2004,2005 and people said Pool.com was more powerful. So hope Snap will be the first.

 

[cityforums.com]

Thanks, Kate! the extension is .com.
When I searched Google, all comparisons where back in 2004,2005 and people said Pool.com was more powerful. So hope Snap will be the first.

Snap is pretty good ... it was amazing when it first started doing business eons ago ... as a matter of fact

I just got an email offer for one of my most valuable domains that they got me for about

$35 bucks or $70.00 if I remember correctly ... another factor is the registrar where the domain currently

sits ... these houses have deals with them ... using more than one backordering service is good practice.



Good Luck !

 

[Kate]

Place a backorder with Snap, Pool, Namejet & Godaddy. You're pretty much covered then :talk:

 

[John Baron]

Place a backorder with Snap, Pool, Namejet & Godaddy. You're pretty much covered then :talk:

godaddy?

 

[lincolndsp]

Snap cought the drop. Now is the auction running. It's my first backordered domain and the first auction at the same time.
EDITED