Unstoppable Domains โ€” Expired Auctions

showcase Showcase your Royal Mint Gold domains (RMG)

SpaceshipSpaceship
Watch

baseballworld

Restricted (Market)
Impact
42,105
This is the time for everyone to see the new niche. Showcase your royal mint gold domains or RMG as they are called. more information here about them here will eb a blockchain much like bitcoin only real gold backing worth billions.

http://bravenewcoin.com/news/uks-royal-mint-and-cme-group-launching-gold-backed-blockchain-assets/

here are my 2

RoyalMintApp.com - obviously gonna be an app made. lol
RMGPrice.com - chose this because in bitcoin phrases it was highest searched phrase monthly behind bitcoin itself.
 
Last edited:
8
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
AfternicAfternic
Thank you MintMarque.com is refocused now with no mention of The Royal Mint, therefore, now there is no infingement of their mark.

Cheers
Corey
ic ic. wow. so merely mentioning Royal Mint on the landing page for MintMarque? that got you a letter from Royal Mint? crazy!
 
0
•••
0
•••
Blockchain is not an exchange mechanism, it is just a way to link records in a sequential stream. The technique has been around since the 1970s, but Bitcoin may have been the first to give it the name blockchain. It seems to be firming up into a description of a specific hierarchical file structure.

The blockchain directory containing
Fixed length files containing
Mined blocks containing
Bitcoin transactions containing
Payment details.

The blocks contain a cryptographic key that prevents tampering or alteration of the block, and interblock links to avoid blocks getting out of sequence. One Bitcoin payment will result in multiple transactions ( fee, refund of unspent coins from a stored block, multiple inputs for large transactions, etc).

Bitcoin is secure because no one can change a block once it is accepted on the Blockchain. I think there are 6.500 nodes around the world, and you would need to change the records on every one of those computers ( and their backups) if you wanted to change a block. You would also have to change the cryptographic solution on the block and subsequent ones as well. I doubt if there is enough computing power in the world to do this.
 
0
•••
OK - here I go out on a limb - I don't think that domains with RMG in them are good investments. There are a number of reasons for this.

When looking for cash related sites, people look for "dollar" not USD in the main.
There is a massive amount of toxic dept in the world, and governments, banks and pension funds are trying to stay afloat with all these liabilities. They are starting to ban cash, and bail-ins are now legal alternatives to bail-outs.
Physical gold buying is now being restricted in China, India and other countries, this may lead to an increase in virtual gold purchases that can be confiscated by the government.

It is difficult to know what the future for gold related sites will be, well the growth niches anyway. It is likely that anything that is critical of RMG is likely to be shut down or blocked. We don't know how Google will treat these names, but they are likely to protect the interests of their advertisers, and the Royal Mint and associates may be significant advertisers
 
1
•••
k good things...the hacking, or inside jobs, or open sourced are serious concerns. Even today with our current banking system there is hacking, inside jobs, fraud, etc..blockchain actually is more solid than what we have. The problem with bitcoin (including the mt gox.) is that if your keys are not secure, you stand to lose everything. Think, it's strongest point is also its greatest weakness...risky. bitcoin is 100% secure until you keys get into the wrong hands. Bitcoin is too big of a liability to serve as a world currency, too many people are trying to steal, and this would be too easy for them (if everyone were a target) the most people, will not accept it to be a serious store of value.

For the bitcoin mining, it will end someday. Mining pays less and less per block, someday it will be a losing propsition. There will need to be bigger fees per transaction paid to 'miners' to in order to keep break even. Still these fees will not be much. With some gold backed blockchain there won't be 'miners' because this blockchain is backed by real gold, and we can't just crypto real gold into the vault...so each transaction will be a tiny fee too. It will be a reward for contriubting. There will be so much transactions that this will be such a tiny ammount, equal to 1 penny or less per transaction. Our old system of money costs more to process.

If governments did launch a blockchain gold backed currency, you probably wouldn't have the keys, unlike bitcoin. it would be a private blockchain, where you were assigned addresses, but they controlled the 'wallet'. This means u are trusting your life savings to them, but aren't we already trusting our life savings to banks? If the government will have many contingency to deal with problems, also they have so much resource they can catch the person, they will make harsh example of anyone trying to steal. Also, if anyone did get 'hacked', nothing of real value is being stolen, because the gold is locked up in the vault. This is why it could be better than Bitcoin. With bitcoin, someone can keylog or otherwise hack your computer and steal all your bitcoin, your life savings. No one will help you, and you will be completely screwed. This is why bitcoin will not be adopted mainstream. With a private gold-backed blockchain, the governments and banks have a vested interest in protecting your money. They can trace any theft on the blockchain no matter how complicated the route, and probably fix the problem. There are scammers everywhere, scamming everything, all the time right now! blockchain, a rather centralized and universal system will make it so hard for the scammers comparatively.

Most people resent the ideas im saying. They think blockchain is the bee knees and it is ment to cut all the government and banks out. I think above that I proved why that won't happen. There is happy medium though. The ledger can still be public, we can see every transaction too, no funny business between polititions, banks etc.

I agree. The "bitcoin blockchain" is not suitable to be utilized as is for other applications. I think that's why the ongoing research now is trying to experiment and even release ready made blockchain for every "use case" based on the original architecture of the blockchain.
Now don't get me wrong but bitcoin is one application of the original blockchain that's meant for creating similar digital currencies. Adopting such a system completely is a true threat to the entire financial systems around the world due to bitcoin blockchain design. That's why different institutions and regulators are embracing the blockchain technology itself and not the special "bitcoin blockchain" for now and trying to figure out standardized ways for the blockchain to fit every "use case". So there might be blockchain for banks and all the related subsystems like credit cards and others. And blockchain for other applications. I think we might even see blockchain APIs roaming around to interface with. The idea boils down to utilize the blockchain high security transaction system: the ledger.

The power is in the interconnected peers of ledgers. So hacking is really hard unless a hacker got to gain access to every "unknown" number of ledgers which is near impossible specially with the blockchain protocol.

There are some "platforms or frameworks" built around blockchain by big companies like MasterCard Blockchain API Targeting Developers The only ongoing research now is about forming a collaborative regulatory for all these platforms to talk to each other.

 
0
•••
Blockchain is just a fancy name for a data storage system, just the same as sequential files, Indexed sequential files, direct access files and structured query language files. Every implementation has differences and variations. Bitcoin is evolving and now has side chains and segregated witness files as exras. The distributed ledger is a Bitcoin development, and is a different feature, so is mining - " proof of stake" is the alternative to Bitcoin's " proof of work" by the way.
 
1
•••
In terms of domains, there was a movement ongoing to implement domain name registration on the bitcoin blockchain. Folks like PeerName was the first registrar to provide registration of domains based on bitcoin blockchain which offered total ownership of domains, impossible censorship, and security communications. Also Namecoin was on it for while.

ะ’lะพัkัhะฐั–n-bะฐั•ะตd dะพmะฐั–nั• however dะพ nะพt rะตั•ะพlvะต bัƒ dะตfะฐult ะพn mะพั•t ะ†ntะตrnะตt ั€rะพvั–dะตrั• due to the old root DNS in place. ะขhะฐt'ั• whัƒ they've dะตvะตlะพั€ะตd their own ะตั…tะตnั•ั–ะพnั• fะพr mะพั•t ั€ะพั€ulะฐr brะพwั•ะตrั•.

But for ICANN that could mean total loss of regulation control since domains names can be finally owned completely by the domain holders. That means no more rent fees but total ownership of domains. No centralized Internet! No centralized root DNS!

I don't think they would go down road any sooner, unless they utilize a non-bitcoin blockchain as a means to track domain names registration and transfers out. That will reduce fraud, and no more 60 day lock punishment for the entire transfer out process anymore. Only the culprits could be identified and tracked down.

Some online references to help refresh this subject with relevant content regarding domaining.
Blockchain Technology Vs. Centralized ICANN
Blockchain and Domain Names Business
Blockchain-DNS Proposed by Blockstack to Replace The Old DNS
The End of The ICANN Monopoly?
 
1
•••
Bitcoin is a money transfer system, and it is going through a bit of a crisis with regards to record sizes - hence SegWit. I wish people would stop trying to put unrelated things on the chain. I believe you can add a dog obituary if you are prepared to pay the miner's fee. This means that every operator of a full node has to pay for the storage without gaining any reward. If too much of this happens, then people will switch to pruned nodes rather than full nodes.
 
1
•••
How can we stop this rubbish that is talked about "The Blockchain". A blockchain can exist on a single server - it is nothing to do with decentralised replication. DNS - domainname servers, not domain name systems, are distributed already. You can't bypass ICANN, because they assign the IP numbers. Well you could if you moved to ham radio, or created a completely different network.
 
1
•••
Bitcoin is a money transfer system, and it is going through a bit of a crisis with regards to record sizes - hence SegWit. I wish people would stop trying to put unrelated things on the chain. I believe you can add a dog obituary if you are prepared to pay the miner's fee. This means that every operator of a full node has to pay for the storage without gaining any reward. If too much of this happens, then people will switch to pruned nodes rather than full nodes.

I asked in a comment on one of your posts about the mining reward, however I couldn't find an input from your side.

With new blockchain platforms the ledgers might be served from multiple companies premises across the world. It's public vs. private ledgers. A mix of the two maybe also possible.
 
0
•••
What do you need to know? The current reward is 12.5 Bitcoin ( it halved fairly recently ). The next halving will occur in about four years time.
 
1
•••
How can we stop this rubbish that is talked about "The Blockchain". A blockchain can exist on a single server - it is nothing to do with decentralised replication. DNS - domainname servers, not domain name systems, are distributed already. You can't bypass ICANN, because they assign the IP numbers. Well you could if you moved to ham radio, or created a completely different network.

One of the major components of blockchain is the decentralized ledger regardless of it being public or private. I think that's already being stated.

Yes DNS is replicated for optimization purpose. But we're talking here about a blockchain backed DNS. Imagine total elimination of DDoS attacks, providing highly secured communications, safe authentic websites to navigate? The current DNS is just hackable. Just read Blockchain.info Down After DNS Attack notice couple of months ago.With blockchain backed DNS you eliminate all of this. So no more network bombarding or unauthorized access to DNS servers.
It's "decentralized DNS" and not "distributed DNS". Two are different terms in this context.

I suggested that ICANN to embrace blockchain to track and record domain registrations and transfer outs. That means all the ICANN accredited registrars have to interface with ICANN blockchain API.
 
0
•••
What do you need to know? The current reward is 12.5 Bitcoin ( it halved fairly recently ). The next halving will occur in about four years time.

Not what I meant exactly. It was a question about the blockchain mechanism, but now I figured it out myself. But good to know about that split :)
 
Last edited:
0
•••
unwatched thread now...way too off topic imho
 
1
•••
0
•••
LunarSeries.com
Great for their Lunar Series silver & gold coins...

Oh, and I have GoldExchange.com
 
Last edited:
6
•••
all rmg domain seems already taken:xf.frown:

RMGBIN.COM
 
2
•••
RMG Buy It Now.
 
2
•••
RMGBritain.com
RMGUnited.com
RMGExpress.com

What do you guys think of these?
 
2
•••
Not bad I like the term express especially. Like express shipping, etc.
 
3
•••
Dynadot โ€” .com TransferDynadot โ€” .com Transfer
CatchedCatched
Escrow.com
Spaceship
Rexus Domain
CryptoExchange.com
Catchy
CatchDoms
DomainEasy โ€” Live Options
DomDB
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the pageโ€™s height.
Back