- Impact
- 47,110
What do you think? Based on Rick's tweets, I believe he is referring to new gTLDs.
Last edited:
Show attachment 60612
What do you think? Based on Rick's tweets, I believe he is referring to new gTLDs.
has anybody studied the real data? I am working on something right now that will speak for itself as far as ranked websites in the top 1/2 million.
PM if you are a blog or stats guy, that is interested in collaborating before I do.
I'm as likely to allow that as I am to buy a self-driving car.Domains will become useless, because in future our brains are connected to a computer-headset-microchip and we don't type or think on an URL to visit a website (if it is then still a website), but we just think on it and then the futuristic device connected to our brains "opens" the information/website.
Maybe or maybe not.
Not Alexa. quantcast.
.mobi was sold to Afilias, and apparently the financials behind the company weren't goodhave any extensions failed or become bankrupt?
I'm as likely to allow that as I am to buy a self-driving car.
I don't know Kuffy, I've seen you drive you may want to consider one.
http://www.nbc.com/saturday-night-live/video/toonces-the-cat/3505887?snl=1
Don't know what you're doing but hopefully it's more than posting how many sites are ranked. People do that with Alexa but when you actually take a look at the sites, most are garbage, as demonstrated in the thread I linked to.
But .Com domains drop too. .Com investors can only drop .Com domains.gTLDs = the domainer's penny stock, and a new alternative for spammers, scammers, hobbyist developers, amateurs, and a handful of start ups who just might succeed and inevitably pay up for their .Com
The collapse happens when large portfolio holders realize their annual long shot (I mean long term) burden and begin dropping at a rapid rate, and the domaining community's mindset evolves to quit buying it (I mean buying them). It's already happening now.
The "new gtlds" are not "new" anymore, we're approaching 4 years. When do we stop calling them "new", and start calling them a 'failed concept' that didn't meet up to their massive expectations when looking at them collectively.
I sure wish @Rick Schwartz would weigh in. Sometimes more than 140 characters is good!