- Impact
- 876
Richard Lau was kind enough to publish a preview of NamesCon 2015 on my blog. Thought you might be interested to see what he has to say about the upcoming conference: http://www.domaininvesting.com/namescon-2015-time-people-opportunities/
That's what we need. Another domainer conference with the usual "industry experts" spewing ego out of their asses.
Doesn't sound like you were @ the event.That's what we need. Another domainer conference with the usual "industry experts" spewing ego out of their asses.
Why the negativity? They aren't for everyone, but they do serve a purpose and provide value to some.
Why the negativity? They aren't for everyone, but they do serve a purpose and provide value to some.
I've seen domainer conventions where typosquaters, auction cheats, and shill-bidders were held in high esteem by the organizers and sucker attendees, even given speaking privileges. To me this seems to be the norm, not the exception. I am always amazed how clueless the newbies are and how domainers with pie-in-the-sky fantasies of quick riches stick their heads in the sand and totally disregard the fact that sleazeballs are on the dais.
What I've also seen is a migration away from the conventions and events by the players who have maintained excellent integrity in the business. Perhaps they are also sick of the stench.
"Why the negativity" you ask? You must be joking.
Are you? Your post sounds like a parody to me.
Not a parody. Yes, I am amazed as I stated. I'm also amazed at those individuals, like you, who are quick to put their thumbs on my perspective, but stand silent about the fraudsters, cheats, and ethically-challenged players who are the reason domainers and the likes are considered dog shit on the shoes of those respectable individuals and entities who venture over for a look.
Yes, you. No parody, bro, just the truth.
It's not the whole truth. It's just who you are. You might be the most miserable domainer I see posting here. Now, there was somebody that actually attended, post #4, who felt the money was well spent.
""No, I didn't attend. Who the f-ck wants to fly to India, a third-world shithole, to see the same dickheads that appear at lots of other conventions""
And the guest speakers opting out was due to getting passports and visas to go to India.
Yes, it is the whole truth.
The possibility of me being "the most miserable domainer" you see posting here may well be accurate, but I doubt it. And it doesn't mean that what I say is not truthful.
No, I didn't attend. Who the f-ck wants to fly to India, a third-world shithole, to see the same dickheads that appear at lots of other conventions? Not me. Oh, by the way, in case your righteous self missed it, guest speaker(s) opted out of attending also, only willing to speak via Skype. I guess the prospect of crapping in a hole in the ground and inhaling funeral pyre fumes wasn't alluring enough to attend. I felt the same.
You know nothing of my success or lack thereof. All you know is you don't like what I have to say, and that you are obsessed with proffering mental health diagnoses based on forum posts. You come off as an arrogant know-it-all.
You hop in sales threads, talking about old Snap incidents that was taken care of.
I'm sure others have. You just happen to mention it here, hehe.Am I the only one who finds it ironic that the antagonist of these conferences is the one causing a thread about them to receive so much attention?![]()



