- Impact
- 12,403
Last edited:
"Wake up"? So we should just choose to ignore Booking.com, Hotels.com, Stamps.com, Gambling.com, Casino.com, Bulletin.com, Homes.com (acquired for $156M), etc. because RealEstate.com currently doesn't resolve?Realestate.com was sold for 8.25 million . The deal included many other things such as trademark + software , other domains and most importantly. "Real Customers " .
The domain is not even in use currently !!! This is a real life story should be studied !
Wake up domainers !!!
They are businesses built on domain names. What's your point? That the domain names they are built on are worthless?Here where most domainers get it wrong . Most of examples you mentioned are Business not Names !!!
There is a big difference .. Wake up domainers !!!
On top of all, property.com gets a lot of "free" traffic/typeins (120,000 visitors/year, source (screenshot)), which adds even more to the "core/base" value, but even without traffic/conversions this name on itself is huge!
PS Great post by Rick:
Show attachment 196421
After acquiring the domain for $750,000 dollars on August 1, 2005 (source: NameBio) Rick Schwartz parked Property.com for several years.By October, the branding had reverted to “operated by Condo.com” and on December 7th, the previously private WHOIS was lifted, revealing Rick Schwartz once again as the domain’s owner.Read MoreProperty.com was pointed to DomainKing.com for a couple of days, but it now forwards to Trulia.com, the online property listing marketplace owned by Zillow...
Exact match .com (inc. generic) always do well on the search engines [USA] (or even do the best), e.g.
“hotels” > #1 Hotels.com
“booking” > #1 Booking.com
“stamps” > #1 Stamps.com
“trip” > #1 Trip.com (not e.g. TripAdvisor.com which is #2)
“fly” > #1 dictionary, #2 Fly.com
“dating” > #1 Wikipedia, #2 Tinder.com, #3 Dating.com (even tho there are far more successful dating sites/apps)
“clover” > #1 Clover.com
“name” > #1 Name.com
“cars” > #1 Cars.com
“homes” > #1 Homes.com
“amazon” > #1 Amazon.com
“ring” > #1 Ring.com
"live" > #1 Live.com
etc. etc. etc.
Even the recent Voice.com has already made it to #5 for "voice"
Facebook’s Bulletin.com launched only 1 month ago, already #3 for "bulletin"
Don’t know how much better the quality of traffic can get than that!
And are you trying to say that generic words/terms are not good for branding?
Other generic word brands:
Adobe
Oracle
Virgin
Oculus
Intel
Clubhouse
Windows
Apple
Time
Tesla (i.e. it’s not a made-up word)
Dreams
Vice
Target
Snap
Zoom
Square
Caterpillar
Fidelity
Snowflake
Match
Yum!
Lucid
Discovery
Chewy
Liberty
Unity
Orange
Blackberry
Carnival
Bumble
Tinder
Fox
Imperial
Nice
Quest
Cardinal
Queen
Box
Tapestry
Gap
Shell
Keep It Simple:
American [Airlines]
Delta [Airlines]
News Corporation
Cable (it comes from a cable)
Choice Hotels
Texas Instruments
Very easy to see “Candy” / Candy.com being a brand, RealEstate.com, and Property.com (that are unforgettable in marketing)
Also LL & LLL = unforgettable
Sometimes LLLL works best?
More:
Fool.com
Investors.com
Bill.com
Monday.com
Flowers.com
Blizzard.com
Alarm.com
2 word:
Best Buy
Beyond Meat
(i.e. not randomly made up but work well)
A person’s name / surname (again not exactly “made up” [from scratch] but from a list of names being used for hundreds of years!) - such as Macy’s
It’s just branding - a very important part of “business”! It clearly works extremely well for many^.
Sometimes completely made-up can work extremely well or even turn out best (or ‘kewl’). Misspelt such as TikTok (but has to be a LOT of marketing spent here to clear up confusion - hence the endless TV ads, sponsoring everything)
Still there will be perhaps hundreds or thousands of brands doing exactly the same thing in a particular industry and only 1 exact match .com for that industry, “hotels?” > Hotels.com, “booking?” > Booking.com