- Impact
- 2,243
Which domains have more value, plural or singular?
i just trying to understand why do Mike Mann dropping singular edition and keeps plural. Show attachment 179674
i just trying to understand why do Mike Mann dropping singular edition and keeps plural. Show attachment 179674
There will be no definitive answer to OP's original question as it depends on the circumstance.
In this particular case, if I was publishing a blog or site about tropical forests, the plural would obviously be preferable.
Nature all the way lolPlural in this case sounds like would encompass all;
as .com guy who think all else “worthless”
(wait, that didnt come out right..)
Sounds like he made a business decision;
and i expect the plural to follow if no fish takes bait.
“It’s all a numbers game.” but i agree @LoodeX sounds like you like “forest niche.”
Perfect environmental domain; .org for “good cause”
Nature all the way lol
Depends.Which domains have more value, plural or singular?
Nature.com is a good developed site
... and 'natures' would be weird.
If I was a forestry worker or ranger writing a blog documenting the single forest I worked in, I'd go with the singular.
If the question is posed from a general investment point, the singular would often be the safer bet.
Fishes can be used in a scientific context to refer to multiple species of fish.i didnt even know “Natures” was a word.
Nature’s Way of telling not a good word in this case...
All favor changing “Nature” to same sing / plural “fish”?
Fishes can be used in a scientific context to refer to multiple species of fish.
"Singular is always better" is a misconception.
Car.com vs Cars.com which makes more commercial sense?
Sometimes, singular is better. Sometimes, plural is better. Sometimes, they are both strong in their own right like in Book.com vs Books.com
So in other words, still a (widely) unrecognized term?
Sounds esoteric;
It's like the words Peoples and Persons.
They are actually valid in certain situations.
Nuances of scientific groupings and legal language etc.
Spot on correct!Singular version is more valuable, and here is why:
- Singular version "TropicalForest" is brandable it can be great brand name
- Plural version "TropicalForests" is more descriptive and not as brandable as singular version, it suits more an information or educational website.
Regarding why Mike Mann dropped the plural version, he has way too many domains, and I don't think he can keep track of all domain he is dropping.
We would say that it depends on the name and in some instances both are invaluable and worth having for brand protection. For example: IntelNerd and IntelNerds both would apply for premium branding in this scenario.Which domains have more value, plural or singular?
Great example and in this instance both should be owned by the same company for brand protection."Singular is always better" is a misconception.
Car.com vs Cars.com which makes more commercial sense?
Sometimes, singular is better. Sometimes, plural is better. Sometimes, they are both strong in their own right like in Book.com vs Books.com
Which is why my answer still remains, "It depends"
He/she asked a simple question ...nor your example compares to TropicalForest & TropicalForests...We would say that it depends on the name and in some instances both are invaluable and worth having for brand protection. For example: IntelNerd and IntelNerds both would apply for premium branding in this scenario.
singulars (plural of singular)Which domains have more value, plural or singular?