1st, thanx 4 ur feedback. I hope u dont mind if i use this space 2 reply 2 both you & gilescoley', as you're both saying basically same. I respect ur opinions but think you're shortsighted & ultimately wrong. I admit there's certain truth to what ur sayin, but sells it short. Technically "home" & "owns" may not normally or easily be found 2gether (i could show you numerous instances, but i but i think i mightve seen someth about "no outside links", so..), but thats not totally fair either. The orig idea w/me was from "homeown". I am surprised to only now find out that homeown is near impossible to find in a dictionary cuz it should def be! It should be a verb, i.e., "to own a home"...or the act of doing so. Makes perfect grammatical sense to me, in that way. Put another way: if you can own a home, you "homeown", just as one can "homestead". If there are parts of speech of: homeowned, homeowner, homeownership(s), homeowning....then there surely should be homeown. All those previous words are only words cuz the have a suffix attached to homeown, thus more valid (imo) reasons for homeown validity. Obviously the root word. What other words work w/all those suffixes, but the root is not a word. Ridiculous, seems to me. I had to 1st validate homeown (tho i know i prolly havent budged ur minds..), in order to explain why "homeowns", that is, for anyone who accepts my above opinions. It was born out of real estate current scene. I didnt make a mistake or stretch when i made this term. It makes a ton more sense than a ton of words you indeed can find in dictionaries of 2day. Incidently, there are many words, phrases & website domain names that are not grammatically correct. Homeowns is supposed to refer & relate to those in pursuit of buying, sellimg, finding, flipping, etc. & while "homeowners" applies, that is a noun & no reason i can see that there cannot be or shouldnt be the verb homeown & that, looked at in terms of multiple occurances, intances, or acts of (owning) would constitute "homeowns". Simply put, if one can own a home, it follows they "homeown" (plural=homeowns) & how on earth can ond be a "homeowner" & not "HOMEOWN"! You may dismiss all above, as baloney, esp since not in dictionary, but i think i gave decent validation. For cryin out loud, there are many absolutely ridiculous words in dictionaries these days, but to homeown makes PERFECT sense! Furthermore, there is a "HOMEOWN" productline from a major co (sorry, i forgot name at moment) that relates to irrigation system advantages. Also, there's a listing for homeowns in findtheword.info. There's a homeown.org & a homeown.com (i didnt know that til now, in trying to make a case for name. Also, below is a tiny section of a wordlist from the computer science programs dictionary from the univercity of central florida, where the word is found (tho i dont think in my context).
====
HOMEOMORPHIC
HOMEOPATH
HOMEOSTASIS
HOMEOWN
HOMEOWNER
HOMERIC
HOMESICK
HOMESTEAD
HOMEWARD
=======
lastly, it can also be thought of as a simple phrase, if not a word per se, contrary to the idea u put forth that the 2 words are never used 2gether. One who has many trophies on their wall, can have also obtained or achieved.....many HOME-OWNS! (making him a home-owner).
I know i know, i'm already beat up & kicked out for this....but while i'm at it....justclickonthis is grammatically right & works for the very reason u gave, which i dont think iks as trivial as ur seeming brush-off, plus does not require the "affiliate" angle only, to work. It works for anything simply cuz of its its inherent suggestiveness, imho.
And keyholing the biggest toys to relate only to sex toys (furthest thing on MY mind, for this) means apparently you never heard of this very very popular phrase(s) of many yrs. Just google or yahoo the word or phrase in any form u can work it. Been around a long time. "the biggest toys for the biggest boys"...."big boys and their big toys"....."the richest boys have the biggest toys". I mean c'mon....think in terms "bigfoot", monster trucks, etc etc etc.
