IT.COM

Parking crew improvement

NameSilo
Watch

frank-germany

domainer since 2001 / musicianTop Member
Impact
14,596
parking crew improvement:

switch off direct advertisers if a domain doesn't get the dollar values you where seeing formerly

My impression is
you better won't rely on the parkingcrew algorithm to
only use direct advertiser when the payout is better

not sure why
but suspicious as I have become over the years
I think they like a happy traffic buyer more
then a happy domainer parking with them anyway
 
0
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
DA (Tier2) is NOT used at all if the domain is NOT banned by Google.
This switcher has no any impact per such domains.

To really utilize DA you need the separate ZeroClick account... without activation of "Premium ads" (Google feed).
 
1
•••
DA (Tier2) is NOT used at all if the domain is NOT banned by Google.
This switcher has no any impact per such domains.

To really utilize DA you need the separate ZeroClick account... without activation of "Premium ads" (Google feed).


based on the CPC I receive
I have to assume that this is not the case

parking crew sells their traffic
and wants to have those customers be happy
spending more and often

in case the pre-spend amount
for traffic can't be supplied
I assume ( I guess , I think, I have come to the conclusion, based on what I recognize in my stats and based on my ridiculously low - 0.01 CPC - on a $1 to $2 USD dollar name )
they simply ignore that fact that google ads would pay more

and give the traffic-buying party what they are asking for
 
0
•••
DA (Tier2) is NOT used at all if the domain is NOT banned by Google.
This switcher has no any impact per such domains.

To really utilize DA you need the separate ZeroClick account... without activation of "Premium ads" (Google feed).


then this switcher is useless
as for the banned domains
you obviously can't activate google ads
 
0
•••
ZeroClick (Tier2) is another model: Revenue per redirect.
CPC/CTR stats has no any sense and may be ignored.

And very often average RPM is significantly higher vs Google feed.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
mumbo
jumbo
wat it sound like to me

one my idn git 4 clicks @ $0.66 epc udder day, only 15 visitors

:)


imo....
 
0
•••
ZeroClick (Tier2) is another model: Revenue per redirect.
CPC/CTR stats has no any sense and may be ignored.

And very often average RPM is significantly higher vs Google feed.


direct advertisers = zero click = direct redirect = no for sale option

direct advertisers pay often like $0.005 USD per "hit"

on a domain that may have a CPC of whatever
that is not good enough
 
0
•••
ZeroClick is designed for monetization... not for sales.
For high traffic domains...

And per my own experience - final monthly revenue may be a few times higher VS parking the same domains with Google feed.
 
0
•••
ZeroClick is designed for monetization... not for sales.
For high traffic domains...

And per my own experience - final monthly revenue may be a few times higher VS parking the same domains with Google feed.


yes but you miss the point completely
 
0
•••
For ZeroClick also matters quality of traffic and from which countries it is coming...
And keywords in the domain body.
 
0
•••
0
•••
upload_2018-6-27_18-53-28.png

upload_2018-6-27_18-52-31.png

upload_2018-6-27_18-52-22.png
 
0
•••
0
•••
0
•••
Forget about RPC/CTR columns.
Only revenue and RPM can be comparable between Google feed and ZeroClick modes/accounts.
 
0
•••
0
•••
And I don't see any significant amount of traffic on your screenshots...
Should be at least X,XXX visits to compare...
 
0
•••
And I don't see any significant amount of traffic on your screenshots...
Should be at least X,XXX visits to compare...

I compare
$1.34 USD ( traffic 62) to $6.12 USD 8 (traffic 43) per month
and
$1.78 USD (traffic 101) to $15.80 USD (traffic 88) per month

2 different but very similar domain names ( plural versus singular )
 
Last edited:
0
•••
0
•••
My comparison (posted above) is absolutely another.
And using real data... with thousands visitors...
ZeroClick is a volume game...
For very small traffic domains it is NOT suitable apriori.
 
0
•••
My comparison (posted above) is absolutely another.
And using real data... with thousands visitors...
ZeroClick is a volume game...
For very small traffic domains it is NOT suitable apriori.

absolutely

so what I said was
for the CPC related domains

try to uncheck "direct advertisers" if you see like 0.04 or 0.01 cent clicks
 
0
•••
I regularly get 0.00-0.05 clicks using Google feed.

And again: DA are NOT used at all if "Premium ads" are enabled AND the domain is NOT banned by Google.
So DA (Tier2) switcher ON/OFF doesn't matter. It has effect only for PURE ZeroClick accounts OR for banned domains.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Regarding ZeroClick...
If quality traffic and from strong countries - it may be even $1.xx and up to few dollars per redirect... from my own experience.
 
1
•••
I regularly get 0.00-0.05 clicks using Google feed.

And again: DA are NOT used at all if "Premium ads" are enabled AND the domain is NOT banned by Google.
So DA (Tier2) switcher ON/OFF doesn't matter. It has effect only for PURE ZeroClick accounts OR for banned domains.

I doubt that
how do you know?

pc tells us that they use DA only if the expected payout is better then with Gooogl Ads
but I doubt that this is the full truth
 
0
•••
0
•••
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back