domain OrganicFertilizers.co.uk ? Sounds good to me

[advaita]

I just registered the name above - sounds good to me, the .com is an up and running website - I was surprised to see the .co.uk still available so I jumped on it - anybody agree/disagree ?

ovt 3557 Google pages 1.7 million

 

[bobdigital]

not bad, but the best fertilizers are synthetic.
and no one knows how to spell fertilizers.
the dot co dot uk can't help.
does it get traffic?

 

[jacal1]

"organic fertilizers" 9500 in Yahoo UK...that's not terribly strong. Certainly worth keeping, but probably not going to bring huge resale.

 

[advaita]

I would think there must be a market for organic fertilizers as people are eating more and more organic food which as far as I iunderstand it must be grown with organic fertilizers. Plus synthetic fertilizers are not good for your brain so as more people eat organic their spelling will improve and I'll get more clicks !
Yes, .com would have been better than .co.uk but I think it would have cost more than the $14 I paid for two years reg.

I only bought it a couple of hours ago from Moniker and so far I can't even change the nameservers to a parking domain, as Moniker seem extraordinarliy slow, with Godaddy you are up and running in five minutes. So maybe I'll avoid Moniker in future.

I think organic stuff can only get better - but I am curious to see how the parking goes, once Moniker give me access to the DNS changing thing, if it proves to be zilch I will get rid of it before the 5 days are up.

 

[jacal1]

The primary issue is the low google for the UK - you are not going to get type-in traffic for that one as a co.uk.

 

[bobdigital]

synthetic fertilizers are not good for your brain

Huh? Do you know what you are talking about?
nitrogen is nitrogen. All fertilizers eventually break down to their elemental form before a plant can use them. Synthetic fertilizers are just broken down organic fertilizers.

 

[advaita]

You may be right - but I was joking.