OneUglyDomain Voting Round 18...who's going to win the Ad Space?

[Andres Kello]

Hey guys,

It's that time of the week again!

Please vote for which offer you think I should accept to trade for my OnlineCasino.im, OnlinePoker.im, Trade 12 shares, and permanent Ad Space on my blog.

If my offer wins again this round, I'm going to auction my 2 domains next round and trade the results of the auction.

Thanks!
Andres

 

[tristanperry]

*Really hoping that the .ims DON'T win*

No offence to Andres or Brian, although IMHO this deserves to win:

Months.us, LicenseHost.com, LinkTypes.com, LoveGamble.com, and PHPBrowser.com

And here's why:

Months.us: A popular, common dictionary .us. Worth low-mid xxx.
LicenseHost.com: "License Host" (w/o quotes) gets 63,500,000 Google results,
LinkTypes.com: 224,000,000 search results..
LoveGamble.com: (A gambling domain with a good extension!!) "Gamble Love" has an OVT score of 34, and obviously "gamble" itself has an OVT score of 14,058.
PHPBrowser.com: 211,000,000 search results, roughly mid xx overture

This offer is a great one - much better than the .im set IMHO. I really hope this wins, I see real potential here This set is probably worth mid-high xxx, too.

Months.us: Low-mid xxx
LicenseHost.com: High xx
LinkTypes.com: Low xxx
LoveGamble.com: High xx
PHPBrowser.com: High xx

Hence a total of around mid-high xxx.

Plus, although the .im set has great keywords, I've never seen a sale of a .im domain. Ever...


-------


EDIT: Just realised that post may have sounded a bit... rude/abrasive? If so, I apologise.

Anywhoo, what does everyone think of what I've written above? Is this offer worth around mid-high xxx, or am i a bit off?

 

[Alex]

Well, I voted for falsifications.com, not because it is mine, but because it is a one word .com that may be well developed.
But other offers were also tempting.

- Alex

 

[-AB-]

Months.us, LicenseHost.com, LinkTypes.com, LoveGamble.com, and PHPBrowser.com

=) Michael

 

[Archangel]

Months.us, LicenseHost.com, LinkTypes.com, LoveGamble.com, and PHPBrowser.com

=) Michael

Looks like the dreaded .ims will be gone soon. See? There really IS a god.

This had my vote, too... wonder if this set will get any decent offers.

 

[Spade]

Although im not a constant follower of OUD - I do think these .im's have sat around too long. Dump the merchandise and start over - just wasting time...

Justin

 

[holdem8]

Months.us, LicenseHost.com, LinkTypes.com, LoveGamble.com, and PHPBrowser.com.....hope these will win!

And I think they will...

Al.

 

[RegFee]

I'm sure it's been brought up before, but I don't think multiple domains should have ever been accepted. All it does is make it ok to submit multiple $xx domains, instead of offering up a single quality name.

I think a fresh start would be a great idea. You've received tons of suggestions and have learned a lot. Why continue down this path when you can start over and get it right?

 

[Brujah]

I'm sure it's been brought up before, but I don't think multiple domains should have ever been accepted. All it does is make it ok to submit multiple $xx domains, instead of offering up a single quality name.

I think a fresh start would be a great idea. You've received tons of suggestions and have learned a lot. Why continue down this path when you can start over and get it right?

Domain trading becomes Portfolio trading.

 

[sibaong]

Domain trading becomes Portfolio trading.

More domains... more wasting time

 

[tristanperry]

Awesome, the Months.us set wins OUD progresses!

 

[Erdy]

Yes, I agree with others on domain sets. Here is my suggestion:

Don't allow set of domains except when the set is for the same name with different extensions (e.g onlinepoker.com and onlinepoker.net).

 

[Brujah]

Awesome, the Months.us set wins OUD progresses!

That's fantastic news.

I voted to keep the Ad Space.

 

[jaro]

This was a good choice...

 

[lzy]

Finally. :o

 

[holdem8]

Phew!

Now the interesting part starts. Lets see if people are more willing to throw in their good domains for this set.

IMHO, trading a set/portfolio defeats the purpose of OUD. It should be ONE ugly domain and not MUD...Many Ugly Domains.

Good luck!

Al

 

[jiosis]

It should be ONE ugly domain and not MUD...Many Ugly Domains.

Good luck!

Al

LOL! I agree!
It decreased the value of individual domain names.
Yes, maybe in future, trades greater than 10k, require multiple domains to meet the value but even that should be limited to 2 or 3. :imho:

 

[Archangel]

Yes, I agree with others on domain sets. Here is my suggestion:

Don't allow set of domains except when the set is for the same name with different extensions (e.g onlinepoker.com and onlinepoker.net).

I think this was what he decided upon with the F9Y set but eventually, he started accepting random lots. That's so unfortunate

 

[Erdy]

Andres is a reasonable person. I think he will start listening to people on this issue.

If I was to offer a set of domains I would go through all my domains and pick all the useless ones. Then I would throw in an average name and would keep the number of total names reasonable just to make it look good. I think this is exactly what is happening. We are trying to decide if this domainer's rubbish is any better than that domainer's rubbish.