QUAD DOMAINS
Established Member
- Impact
- 502
On behalf of the next generation, we ask:
Will the legacy of domaining and the domain industry appeal to the next generation? Will the two capture the desire of young people to get involved?
Have all the future prospects of the domain industry been thrown into the proverbial fire for the sake of narrowing the domain name value-spectrum?
Do some domain investors castrate the possibility of new blood entering the domain space when they say things like “all the good names are registered”?
Has domain investing culture become so self-serving the ideas and preferences of a younger demographic mean nothing if they don’t align with old-guard values?
Is it possible the portfolios of domains that have been amassed won’t serve the future? Will they do nothing more than serve as an ode to the investing of past years?
Does the domain investing space clearly being deficient of women, children and innovation serve as a sign it won’t have much of a place in tomorrow’s internet?
Are domain investors actually doing their part to help move the domain space forward in a way that doesn’t make inclusive investing seem so far-fetched?
Has the collective focus on registering, selling, trading, dropping and celebrating certain domains kept investment in the next generation almost non-existent?
For those of us who care about what comes next, we have some valid questions to consider and answer….if we can.
Will the legacy of domaining and the domain industry appeal to the next generation? Will the two capture the desire of young people to get involved? Have all the future prospects of the domain industry been thrown into the proverbial fire for the sake of narrowing the domain name value-spectrum? Do some domain investors castrate the possibility of new blood entering the domain space when they say things like “all the good names are registered”? Has domain investing culture become so self-serving the ideas and preferences of a younger demographic mean nothing if they don’t align with old-guard values? Is it possible the portfolios of domains that have been amassed won’t serve the future? Will they do nothing more than serve as an ode to the investing of past years? Does the domain investing space clearly being deficient of women, children and innovation serve as a sign it won’t have much of a place in tomorrow’s internet? Are domain investors actually doing their part to help move the domain space forward in a way that doesn’t make inclusive investing seem so far-fetched? Has the collective focus on registering, selling, trading, dropping and celebrating certain domains kept investment in the next generation almost non-existent? For those of us who care about what comes next, we have some valid questions to consider and answer….if we can.
Remember, a skewed interpretation can be the barrier to an accurate understanding.
Furthermore, the post is from elder statesmen to elder statesmen.
It was drafted with both an open-mind and open-heart.
An “ageist rant” it’s NOT. An inquiry about what “WE” are passing on it IS.
We don’t partake in ageism, racism etc. Discrimination has NO place in the world.
Peace and blessings to you.
Before any more downvotes and negative energy gets to flowing with this post, we respectfully ask that comments remain constructive and progressive. 
The post consists of nothing but questions. Questions intended to make us all think about the future of “domaining beyond the sales”. Pardon us for caring that much.
