NEW "G"S KICK ASS ON EXACT MATCH .COM SALES COMPS

[168]

MERRY CHRISTMAS NEW "G" SUPORTERS !

DEDICATED TO LOLWARRIOR

For takin some heat 12.6 / pg 6


Source: Namebio/Sold.Domains
Please post additional sales comps if you have them. There wasn't much to find due to .Com age and NDA's
Disclosure: I invest in .Global and.Club
Free endorsement

IF YOU HAD INVESTED IN THE NEW "G"'S BELOW VS. .COM YOU WOULD BE ABOUT 180K HAPPIER TODAY!
YES FOLKS. THAT'S A WHOPPING 180,000.00 ( AFTER EXPENSES )


HAPPY HUNTING !

DATE (.COM) .COM NEW “G” DIFFERENCE DOMAIN

5.08 6500 50000 +43500 LUXURY.ESTATE
5.09 2000 15000 +13000 JOBS.GLOBAL
9.15 2055 19200 +17145 WEB.BIZ
2.16 3438 12000 + 8562 LK.GLOBAL
4.13 350 13750 +13400 CHINESE.CLUB
4.14 9500 100000 +90500 AUTISM.ROCKS
7.08 3688 25000 +21312 BUSINESS.GLOBAL

27531 234950 + 207419

 

[dordomai]

Now your just using rhetoric to try and minimize the heat your getting. There is nothing reasonable,sensible or valuable about posting invalid data, twisting others words and trying to belittle the efforts of others. It is very easy to dissect someones logic when it is fallacious and wrong. You need to realize that what you are doing is wrong and not only do your posts brush people the wrong way, it actually has a negative impact on towards your "online" image on this forum. Saying that what I've written is nonsensical only proves my point even further because my posts have directly assessed the fallacious and bias assertions you have made, making them clearly visible for everyone to see.


You have been discredited, constantly to the point where I don't take enjoyment from it anymore. Please stop wasting your time.

at least I have, unlike you, posted data. You are the one using rethoric because you have nothing else to offer.

What I have posted is sound. If you think value of nGTLD > value of .com you still need to learn a lot.

 

[slader23]

Your data is inconclusive,invalid, bias and irrelevant. I'm glad you finally acknowledge that. Also FYI, I don't need to post data because that has already been done by the OP. If you want data, refer to the first post. Let me remind you. The purpose of this thread was to dedicate a report on public data, comparing ngtld sales with .com sales of word.word to word+word.com to a NP member that was abused for not posting it in another thread. Your involvement in this thread has derailed the topic and turned someones sincere intentions into a hogwash thread where you try and do the same thing over and over again expecting different results.

STOP WASTING YOUR TIME.

 

[dordomai]

Your data is inconclusive,invalid, bias and irrelevant..

No it was valid.

 

[slader23]

No it was valid.

Are you kidding me? Stop wasting your time. Go find some .Com's to sell.

 

[dordomai]

Are you kidding me?

No. You are kidding yourself.

Stop wasting your time.

I am wasting my time. I agree with that.

 

[mad409]

PORNLIVE.COM last sold for $10,000 on 2011-02-04 at Sedo

PORN.LIVE last sold for $120,000 on 2016-08-07 at Rightside[/QUOTE]

Did you even enter the url and look?

dordomai said:
"They spent 6 figures on a name only to put up a $5 logo and a free template."

https://www.namepros.com/threads/go...lveforx-com-to-it.984062/page-25#post-5878922

It redirects and the pics go to porn.live.

Chill out, take a walk or something...

I feel another dislike coming on.

 

[168]

It is, unlike the nonsensical stuff that you post, valuable and reasonable information.

Valuable YES in some other thread
IRRELEVANT TO THE DISCUSSION YES
SCORE NEW "G"s 8 .COMs 5

Happy Hunting

 

[slader23]

No. You are kidding yourself.



I am wasting my time. I agree with that.

Your right I'm kidding myself. I thought you would have realized you were wasting your time hours ago.

 

[dordomai]

Did you even enter the url and look?

dordomai said:
"They spent 6 figures on a name only to put up a $5 logo and a free template."

https://www.namepros.com/threads/go...lveforx-com-to-it.984062/page-25#post-5878922

It redirects and the pics go to porn.live.

Chill out, take a walk or something...

I feel another dislike coming on.

I don't visit it on a daily basis.

Maybe the site has changed in the meantime. It still looks like a 5$ logo to me.

Not sure what you mean.

 

[mad409]

I don't visit it on a daily basis.

Maybe the site has changed in the meantime. It still looks like a 5$ logo to me.

Not sure what you mean.

And from the pro!

 

[168]

I am not trying to distort the truth. I don't need to. It is self evident what is true.

It defies logic why a nGTLD name would on average be not only be worth the same but also more than that or than previous sales. Think about it.

It's not that the domain market has gone up.

That is obviously nonsense that should be apparent to anyone.





if you think that in a world where most startups want a .com, nGTLDs will sell for more on average then you are dreaming.

OFF TOPIC PLEASE REFRAIN OR STOP POSTING
More opinion vs fact?
I really do appreciate relevant specific information especially since the scoreboard went up
We need .commies like you to step up and play by the rules or we will never know
Otherwise yea your rep is beginning to be worthy of the penalty box.
Happy Hunting

 

[Rainmaker-NL]

This thread is amusing to some extend, except for the uncivilized behaviour in some posts. Some Christmas spirit wouldnt hurt.
And please dont start to debate X.mas vs Xmas.com.......

 

[wormfood]

I don't see anything fake about publicly reported transactions. Do you? I'd be suprised if you'd take kindly to someone pointing at a value on your balance sheet saying its "propaganda/fake news". Fake news would be adding 3 zeros to every single transaction posted on 168's list and Propaganda would be him claiming that those final sale prices were real. Neither of those things have happened so the only thing that is " Propaganda/Fake news" is you saying that it is "Propaganda/Fake news".

I tried to be nice about it when I posted my response. A couple of the new TLD sales beating the .com actually made sense. But @168 did leave out an important part, the sales venues, and though he did post the dates of the .com sales, some people could have misread them as month/day instead of month/year.
The point is that some of these are old sales and even sold at places like NameJet, where things mostly go for reseller prices.

luxuryestate.com was sold in 2008. Fine, maybe it wouldn't sell today, or for hardly any more than it did in 2008. I'm no expert.

webbiz.com was sold on Namejet, probably not an end user sale.
web.biz is clearly better here anyway, in my opinion.

Weren't all of the .global ones sold by the .global registry? So how does this statement apply:
"IF YOU HAD INVESTED IN THE NEW "G"'S BELOW VS. .COM YOU WOULD BE ABOUT 180K HAPPIER TODAY! "
And it seems like one of them may have even been sold by the registry to a domainer.

autism.rocks was an outlier sale, most likely a donation to an autism charity.

chinese.club, a Namejet sale, was compared to an end user sale for chinese.club. Yes, I still think the chinese.club sale was good. I think anyone here could tell you that chineseclub.com would sell for much more than 350 USD to an end user. How much? I don't know.

Now please stop telling people they are only spewing rhetoric while you are failing to look at the reality of those few sales he posted and wanting us to bow to your own rhetoric instead.

This isn't news, in my opinion, and shouldn't be in the News section (oh, never mind, it did get moved). It's a list of a few sales without some of the key details.
But I really don't mind that he posted it in the news section. People who are gullible will lap it up wherever it's posted.

 

[168]

at least I have, unlike you, posted data. You are the one using rethoric because you have nothing else to offer.

What I have posted is sound. If you think value of nGTLD > value of .com you still need to learn a lot.

The data you posted may be sound but that's not the point. The data is completely irrelevant to the topic. Your also trying
to pass it off as relevant in some twisted way.
Sladers posts stand on their own merit. People that understand business know experienced vs inexperienced.
Slader 23 has offered sound logic and known standards that apply to all industries. What is rampant in this industry
is the general lack of understanding business concepts such as cycles, growth, and the expansion of product necessary
to ensure future growth when the original growth product reaches peak or near peak saturation and becomes stale.
ICANN may have blown it's wade all at once but the market will correct this in time.
Happy Hunting

 

[disaac81]

The new G's have certainly brought a whole bunch of idiots to this game who think they are experts from the moment they post their first post.

Real lack of intelligence coming from the same people again and again. No point trying to teach them, they are clueless and live in a dream world.

.COM rules. Very amusing thread though, trying to say ngtld's are worth more than the .com, lol.

 

[168]

This thread is amusing to some extend, except for the uncivilized behaviour in some posts. Some Christmas spirit wouldnt hurt.
And please dont start to debate X.mas vs Xmas.com.......

You may not be aware but there are a few party poopers that like to intentionally disrupt conversations in topics they have no
interest in, have demonstrated a certain level of ignorance in business operations in general, and haven't taken several polite requests by several participants to bugger off and play their games somewhere else. One can only assume their desire for attention is greater than respectfully restraining themselves in a professional manner.
So if they don't get the message it will get louder and less considerate.
Cheers

 

[168]

The new G's have certainly brought a whole bunch of idiots to this game who think they are experts from the moment they post their first post.

Real lack of intelligence coming from the same people again and again. No point trying to teach them, they are clueless and live in a dream world.

.COM rules. Very amusing thread though, trying to say ngtld's are worth more than the .com, lol.

Just curious... What is your expertise ? You have misquoted the intent of this thread, maybe you should read the title again.
.COM rules is a sign that a sheeple is following the wrong people. No doubt .com is solid and will be around for a long time but
that's not the point. You may want to do your own homework before you make such blanket statements as it is also an indicator
of inexperience.
Cheers

 

[London555]

Just picked up RA7.xyz bought it because obviously its short / china etc but then was just told that star wars uses this also ? No idea what it might be worth if anything in the future - we'll see but VERY few 3LLN.xyz left to hand reg for next to nothing.

 

[168]

I tried to be nice about it when I posted my response. A couple of the new TLD sales beating the .com actually made sense. But @168 did leave out an important part, the sales venues, and though he did post the dates of the .com sales, some people could have misread them as month/day instead of month/year.
The point is that some of these are old sales and even sold at places like NameJet, where things mostly go for reseller prices.

luxuryestate.com was sold in 2008. Fine, maybe it wouldn't sell today, or for hardly any more than it did in 2008. I'm no expert.

webbiz.com was sold on Namejet, probably not an end user sale.
web.biz is clearly better here anyway, in my opinion.

Weren't all of the .global ones sold by the .global registry? So how does this statement apply:
"IF YOU HAD INVESTED IN THE NEW "G"'S BELOW VS. .COM YOU WOULD BE ABOUT 180K HAPPIER TODAY! "
And it seems like one of them may have even been sold by the registry to a domainer.

autism.rocks was an outlier sale, most likely a donation to an autism charity.

chinese.club, a Namejet sale, was compared to an end user sale for chinese.club. Yes, I still think the chinese.club sale was good. I think anyone here could tell you that chineseclub.com would sell for much more than 350 USD to an end user. How much? I don't know.

Now please stop telling people they are only spewing rhetoric while you are failing to look at the reality of those few sales he posted and wanting us to bow to your own rhetoric instead.

This isn't news, in my opinion, and shouldn't be in the News section (oh, never mind, it did get moved). It's a list of a few sales without some of the key details.
But I really don't mind that he posted it in the news section. People who are gullible will lap it up wherever it's posted.

You have some good rhetoric and some interesting excuses, venue, sold to a domainer, outlier in an attempt to discredit the only data this industry has to rely on for comps. Since when does venue matter ? Since when does domainer vs enduser matter?
Sales data is irrelevant because it was sold to a domainer ?
Sales data is irrelevant because a registrar sold it ?
Outliers don't count either ?
The only sales that count are what ?
Sounds like the pure definition of .rhetoric
I didn't bother to post New "G" dates because just about everybody would be aware the sales would have been sometime
in the last 2 years and if a reader was a newbie it wouldn't take much additional reading to know this.
The sales venues are relevant Why ? This was strictly a letter for letter, dollar for dollar comparison intentionally to deter personal agenda, .commie propaganda, and excuses to discredit hard, factual, data.
Sales are sales and it's irrelevant who profited. It's absurd to suggest a sale doesn't count because someone other than a domainer
profited or pure speculation it would have sold for more if it was someone else. Seriously These .coms have been on the shelf for 30 years ! Was this even a thought as to why they didn't command a higher value ? Again Rhetorical ?
Even I didn't expect to see these kinds of results so soon. This is HISTORICAL. Why wouldn't it be news worthy when it's the biggest current speculative debate in this industry ?Will it continue ? who knows. A lot of people have large portfolios to protect I get it.

The point of the title is not only is it possible it's happening and maybe people should start paying attention to the only factual data we have to go by instead of pure conjecture from self described experts. Being in an industry a long time doesn't make you an expert. Sure it helps but if that expert is having difficulty distinguishing their opinion from fact then it's important to report the facts. .commies were also quite rude and demanding "proof" all while expecting readers to "just take their opinion over several others. Fair enough. Bam Done. The claim that New "G"s will never be more valuable is now known to be FALSE.
Please, We all know there are some .coms, a very small percentage, that will always be at the top of the sales charts. There aren't even other .coms that will topple them.
"Experts" are sure It's going to take time for end users to "trust and accept" That is straight up BS.
The claim that New"G"s aren't being developed is being debunked daily as well. Another weak argument tossed around.
The difference between the .commies and the New "G" supporters is your either a domainer and support the industry or your a .commie and support .com and there are plenty of discussions for just .com and if your not interested in the New "G"s then please
don't bother, insult, skew facts, in threads where people want to learn facts and discuss their interests in New "G"s.
Cheers

 

[168]

Just picked up RA7.xyz bought it because obviously its short / china etc but then was just told that star wars uses this also ? No idea what it might be worth if anything in the future - we'll see but VERY few 3LLN.xyz left to hand reg for next to nothing.

Nice ! Now you have 2 crowds to sell to.! Someone might even want to name a space craft RA7 China has been active in sending
up space craft lately. RA - Sun .xyz - little universe (this is why it's popular in China besides the cheap regs)
Happy Hunting!

 

[London555]

Nice ! Now you have 2 crowds to sell to.! Someone might even want to name a space craft RA7 China has been active in sending
up space craft lately. RA - Sun .xyz - little universe (this is why it's popular in China besides the cheap regs)
Happy Hunting!

Interesting-thank you.

 

[168]

INSURANCEME.COM last sold for $449 on 2015-08-08 at GoDaddy


Insurance.me $15,000 2016-07-12 Sedo

This won't be included for the purpose of this thread it's just another example of preferred relevance.
The .com is being used as a redirect for a boxing site.
Happy Hunting

 

[dordomai]

The claim that New "G"s will never be more valuable is now known to be FALSE.

what I find is that when I find a sale the .com is usually selling higher. So I think it's just not true that they are selling for more. I don't know how the list was made and who made it but for me it is the opposite, it's much harder to find an nGTLD that sells for more.

more random sales..

jeuxcasino.fr 5,000 USD 2016-03-29 Uniregistry
jeux.casino 1,132 USD 2016-04-19 Sedo

sex.guide 605 USD 2016-05-18 Flippa
sexguide.nl 1,550 USD 2013-10-02 Sedo
sexguide.be 984 USD 2015-06-04 Sedo

healthy.news 250 USD 2015-09-22 Flippa
healthynews.com 600 USD 2005-10-01 SnapNames

seoacademy.in 1,000 USD 2012-03-28 Sedo
seo.academy 798 USD 2015-10-16 Sedo

businesscollege.com 6,100 USD 2013-04-28 NameJet
business.college 3,900 USD 2016-01-21 NameJet

 

[Rainmaker-NL]

Nice ! Now you have 2 crowds to sell to.! Someone might even want to name a space craft RA7 China has been active in sending
up space craft lately. RA - Sun .xyz - little universe (this is why it's popular in China besides the cheap regs)
Happy Hunting!

Off-topic ??

 

[London555]

INSURANCEME.COM last sold for $449 on 2015-08-08 at GoDaddy


Insurance.me $15,000 2016-07-12 Sedo

This won't be included for the purpose of this thread it's just another example of preferred relevance.
The .com is being used as a redirect for a boxing site.
Happy Hunting

We have INSURANCE.moe ( correct spelling on this Japan extension) trying to figure out what to do with it lol