NEW "G"S KICK ASS ON EXACT MATCH .COM SALES COMPS

[168]

MERRY CHRISTMAS NEW "G" SUPORTERS !

DEDICATED TO LOLWARRIOR

For takin some heat 12.6 / pg 6


Source: Namebio/Sold.Domains
Please post additional sales comps if you have them. There wasn't much to find due to .Com age and NDA's
Disclosure: I invest in .Global and.Club
Free endorsement

IF YOU HAD INVESTED IN THE NEW "G"'S BELOW VS. .COM YOU WOULD BE ABOUT 180K HAPPIER TODAY!
YES FOLKS. THAT'S A WHOPPING 180,000.00 ( AFTER EXPENSES )


HAPPY HUNTING !

DATE (.COM) .COM NEW “G” DIFFERENCE DOMAIN

5.08 6500 50000 +43500 LUXURY.ESTATE
5.09 2000 15000 +13000 JOBS.GLOBAL
9.15 2055 19200 +17145 WEB.BIZ
2.16 3438 12000 + 8562 LK.GLOBAL
4.13 350 13750 +13400 CHINESE.CLUB
4.14 9500 100000 +90500 AUTISM.ROCKS
7.08 3688 25000 +21312 BUSINESS.GLOBAL

27531 234950 + 207419

 

[Brands.International]

MERRY CHRISTMAS NEW "G" SUPORTERS !

DEDICATED TO LOLWARRIOR

For takin some heat 12.6 / pg 6


Source: Namebio/Sold.Domains
Please post additional sales comps if you have them. There wasn't much to find due to .Com age and NDA's
Disclosure: I invest in .Global and.Club
Free endorsement

IF YOU HAD INVESTED IN THE NEW "G"'S BELOW VS. .COM YOU WOULD BE ABOUT 180K HAPPIER TODAY!
YES FOLKS. THAT'S A WHOPPING 180,000.00 ( AFTER EXPENSES )


HAPPY HUNTING !

DATE (.COM) .COM NEW “G” DIFFERENCE DOMAIN

5.08 6500 50000 +43500 LUXURY.ESTATE
5.09 2000 15000 +13000 JOBS.GLOBAL
9.15 2055 19200 +17145 WEB.BIZ
2.16 3438 12000 + 8562 LK.GLOBAL
4.13 350 13750 +13400 CHINESE.CLUB
4.14 9500 100000 +90500 AUTISM.ROCKS
7.08 3688 25000 +21312 BUSINESS.GLOBAL

27531 234950 + 207419

Thanks mate for your post and some great examples! And Happy Christmas to you too

 

[168]

Thanks mate for your post and some great examples! And Happy Christmas to you too

Top Gun - They want the Truth? They can't handle the Truth
History in the making. I didn't even expect to see this so soon.
I suppose we have the antagonist's to thank for this small victory
Happy Hunting !

 

[slader23]

propaganda/fake news

I don't see anything fake about publicly reported transactions. Do you? I'd be suprised if you'd take kindly to someone pointing at a value on your balance sheet saying its "propaganda/fake news". Fake news would be adding 3 zeros to every single transaction posted on 168's list and Propaganda would be him claiming that those final sale prices were real. Neither of those things have happened so the only thing that is " Propaganda/Fake news" is you saying that it is "Propaganda/Fake news".

 

[168]

Interesting when newbies boast and post their first sale many participate in their excitement.
When New "G"s boast and post their first higher value sales it's some how propaganda.
I myself didn't expect to see this milestone so soon.
This is historical.
Why it was decided it wasn't news worthy to the entire industry is beyond me.
Happy Hunting

 

[dordomai]

waterfront.property - 2,450 USD
waterfrontproperty.com - 80,850 USD - 33 times more

beachfront.property - 4,750 USD
beachfrontproperty.com - 32,000 US - 6.7 times more

investment.property 4.5k USD
investmentproperty.com.au 137k USD

e.flowers 4.5k USD
eflowers.com 1 million USD

 

[dordomai]

the highest e+ word.com and nGTLD sales:

ebet.com 1,350,000 USD 2013-10-23 Private
eflowers.com 1,000,000 USD 2003-02-01 Private
egifts.com 250,000 USD 2003-02-01 Private
esignature.com 150,000 USD 2011-08-17 DomainGuardians
ediscovery.com 100,000 USD 2012-04-04 Uniregistry / DomainAdvisors
eromance.com 100,000 USD 2008-03-12 Moniker
ecruise.com 100,000 USD 2004-09-01 Private
emedia.com 60,000 USD 2011-11-16 SnapNames

e.link 10,200 USD 2016-01-31 NameJet
e.gift 8,000 USD 2016-01-11 NamesCon
e.help 5,000 USD 2016-01-11 NamesCon
e.flowers 4,500 USD 2016-01-11 NamesCon
e.toys 1,608 USD 2016-09-10 Flippa
e.guide 1,334 USD 2016-07-28 Flippa
e.ski 1,112 USD 2016-01-11 NamesCon
e.financial 530 USD 2016-04-02 Flippa

the highest i+ word.com and nGTLD sales

isearch.com 300,000 USD 2008-08-27 Private
iguide.com 100,000 USD 2009-08-07 Afternic
ipets.com 75,000 USD 2008-06-11 Afternic
ipal.com 59,000 USD 2009-08-19 Sedo
iacademy.com 55,000 USD 2014-04-09 GoDaddy

i.work 10,000 USD 2016-04-01 Uniregistry
i.club 9,999 USD 2016-09-16 Sedo
i.rent 9,000 USD 2016-01-11 NamesCon
i.link 8,250 USD 2016-01-11 NamesCon
i.click 8,000 USD 2016-01-11 NamesCon
i.bio 7,000 USD 2015-12-21 Uniregistry
i.ski 3,250 USD 2016-01-11 NamesCon
i.company 2,150 USD 2016-02-22 Sedo
i.forex 999 USD 2016-11-03 Sedo

 

[168]

the highest e+ word.com and nGTLD sales:

ebet.com 1,350,000 USD 2013-10-23 Private
eflowers.com 1,000,000 USD 2003-02-01 Private
egifts.com 250,000 USD 2003-02-01 Private
esignature.com 150,000 USD 2011-08-17 DomainGuardians
ediscovery.com 100,000 USD 2012-04-04 Uniregistry / DomainAdvisors
eromance.com 100,000 USD 2008-03-12 Moniker
ecruise.com 100,000 USD 2004-09-01 Private
emedia.com 60,000 USD 2011-11-16 SnapNames



the highest i+ word.com and nGTLD sales

isearch.com 300,000 USD 2008-08-27 Private
iguide.com 100,000 USD 2009-08-07 Afternic
ipets.com 75,000 USD 2008-06-11 Afternic
ipal.com 59,000 USD 2009-08-19 Sedo
iacademy.com 55,000 USD 2014-04-09 GoDaddy

i.work 10,000 USD 2016-04-01 Uniregistry
i.club 9,999 USD 2016-09-16 Sedo
i.rent 9,000 USD 2016-01-11 NamesCon
i.link 8,250 USD 2016-01-11 NamesCon
i.click 8,000 USD 2016-01-11 NamesCon
i.bio 7,000 USD 2015-12-21 Uniregistry
i.ski 3,250 USD 2016-01-11 NamesCon
i.company 2,150 USD 2016-02-22 Sedo
i.forex 999 USD 2016-11-03 Sedo

Nice list. So what. Where's the comps ?
Do you not get the parameters of the debate ?
word for word comps
Happy Hunting

 

[dordomai]

Nice list. So what. Where's the comps ?
Do you not get the parameters of the debate ?

The parameters are objective and honest reporting.

 

[168]

PORNLIVE.COM last sold for $10,000 on 2011-02-04 at Sedo

PORN.LIVE last sold for $120,000 on 2016-08-07 at Rightside

 

[dordomai]

PORNLIVE.COM last sold for $10,000 on 2011-02-04 at Sedo

PORN.LIVE last sold for $120,000 on 2016-08-07 at Rightside

single sales are meaningless. On average .com sells for far more. As nicely shown in the many examples that others gave and as shown by my post.

This resembles a pump and dump scheme.

 

[168]

The parameters are objective and honest reporting.

That's your universe.
The parameters I set on my thread are not objective they are very specific for a reason. To minimize twisted dishonest debate.
Just the facts Jack. Otherwise start your own thread and have all the objective and dishonest debates you enjoy.
Happy Hunting

 

[dordomai]

That's your universe.
The parameters I set on my thread are not objective they are very specific for a reason. To minimize twisted dishonest debate.
Just the facts Jack. Otherwise start your own thread and have all the objective and dishonest debates you enjoy.
Happy Hunting

Ok I get it that we are still in the 'pump' phase. When will the dump start?

 

[168]

single sales are meaningless. On average .com sells for far more. As nicely shown in the many examples that others gave and as shown by my /threads/new-g-s-kick-ass-on-exact-match-com-sales-comps.

This resembles a pump and dump scheme.

If single sales are meaningless then your examples are too. Duh

SCORE New "G" exact match examples 8 .Com examples 4
GAME ON !!!
Cheers

 

[dordomai]

If single sales are meaningless then your examples are too. Duh

SCORE New "G" exact match examples 8 .Com examples 4
GAME ON !!!
Cheers

Far more were given even in the others threads. I could dig up far more.

 

[168]

Ok I get it that we are still in the 'pump' phase. When will the dump start?

You are clearly on your way
Thanks
Happy Hunting

 

[168]

Far more were given even in the others threads. I could dig up far more.

Go for it

Thanks
Happy Hunting

 

[dordomai]

stockphotos.com 250k USD
stock.photo / stock.photos, 60000 USD (2 domains)

 

[Rainmaker-NL]

the highest e+ word.com and nGTLD sales:

ebet.com 1,350,000 USD 2013-10-23 Private
eflowers.com 1,000,000 USD 2003-02-01 Private
egifts.com 250,000 USD 2003-02-01 Private
esignature.com 150,000 USD 2011-08-17 DomainGuardians
ediscovery.com 100,000 USD 2012-04-04 Uniregistry / DomainAdvisors
eromance.com 100,000 USD 2008-03-12 Moniker
ecruise.com 100,000 USD 2004-09-01 Private
emedia.com 60,000 USD 2011-11-16 SnapNames

e.link 10,200 USD 2016-01-31 NameJet
e.gift 8,000 USD 2016-01-11 NamesCon
e.help 5,000 USD 2016-01-11 NamesCon
e.flowers 4,500 USD 2016-01-11 NamesCon
e.toys 1,608 USD 2016-09-10 Flippa
e.guide 1,334 USD 2016-07-28 Flippa
e.ski 1,112 USD 2016-01-11 NamesCon
e.financial 530 USD 2016-04-02 Flippa

the highest i+ word.com and nGTLD sales

isearch.com 300,000 USD 2008-08-27 Private
iguide.com 100,000 USD 2009-08-07 Afternic
ipets.com 75,000 USD 2008-06-11 Afternic
ipal.com 59,000 USD 2009-08-19 Sedo
iacademy.com 55,000 USD 2014-04-09 GoDaddy

i.work 10,000 USD 2016-04-01 Uniregistry
i.club 9,999 USD 2016-09-16 Sedo
i.rent 9,000 USD 2016-01-11 NamesCon
i.link 8,250 USD 2016-01-11 NamesCon
i.click 8,000 USD 2016-01-11 NamesCon
i.bio 7,000 USD 2015-12-21 Uniregistry
i.ski 3,250 USD 2016-01-11 NamesCon
i.company 2,150 USD 2016-02-22 Sedo
i.forex 999 USD 2016-11-03 Sedo

Didnt expect to see the day that Dordomai would voluntarily start searching the internet for new Gtld sales in order to report them here.......

 

[168]

stockphotos.com 250k USD
stock.photo / stock.photos, 60000 USD (2 domains)

Now you got it !
Thanks,
SCOREBOARD UPDATE : NEW"G" 8 .COM 5

 

[168]

Didnt expect to see the day that Dordomai would voluntarily start searching the internet for new Gtld sales in order to report them here.......

LOL The best outcome anyone could appreciate. Thanks for pointing that out
Dordomai, I think you just might make it over the wall. I appreciate your efforts.
Happy Hunting

 

[slader23]

stockphotos.com 250k USD
stock.photo / stock.photos, 60000 USD (2 domains)

1.You lost the moment you started comparing transactions that weren't word.word vs wordword.com, you can't compare all e+word or i+word transactions if there are no comparable ngtlds to match the .com...doing so goes beyond logic and is a clear attempt to deceive others. You also became redundant and hypocritical in your arguments claiming single transactions were in no way representative of a large enough sample size to make a clear conclusion that word.word was more valuable than word+word in aggregate, when in reality you were the one posting singular sales as examples, and you continue to do so.

2.Inconclusive and bias misrepresentations of data will never be considered viable here, in real life, in the court room and in the classroom. Making arguments using your strategy in a boardroom would leave most people out of a job. Either you be straight with people and provide clear and unbiased facts or don't even bother.

3. It is very clear that you have some deep rooted disdain for ngtlds, considering the amount of effort you have taken to try and discredit, ruin and offtrack the focus of numerous ngtld threads. I don't know where it comes from but I'd just like to be quite clear with you and say that at the most basic level what your doing is despicable. I mean lets put this into perspective:

Lets say a new technology comes out that cuts fuels on specific brands of cars 50%. A report comes out comparing the prices of new cars coming out with this technology from specific brands comparing the prices of old versions vs new versions showing that they new technology drives up the initial cost of the car but reduces the cost of fuel in the long run.

Lets assume the new technology is called WORD.WORD and the old car brands used a technology called Word+Word.COM. So far only specific brands of cars using the old technology have switched to the new one.

Now lets say @168 a researcher that has posted an article comparing the prices of SPECIFIC brands using the new technology WORD.WORD to the old technology WORD+WORD.COM.

Here is what you have done:
Posted prices of WORD.WORD in comparison to WORD+WORD.com's where .WORD doesn't yet exist i.e either technology hasn't been adopted or no comparative sale has been made. Stating that this is valid evidence contrary to the premise, data and conditions of comparison provided by the OP.

Now lets think about this...basically you posted a bunch of useless information and said "look everyone! this is real this is the truth!" When in fact it was nothing but irrelevant garbage.


Stop wasting your time. Go find yourself something more constructive to do...maybe look for some more .COMs to add to your portfolio. This way you could actually make a positive impact on something...posting here is just bad karma.

 

[dordomai]

I am not trying to distort the truth. I don't need to. It is self evident what is true.

It defies logic why a nGTLD name would on average be not only be worth the same but also more than that or than previous sales. Think about it.

It's not that the domain market has gone up.

That is obviously nonsense that should be apparent to anyone.

More useful information.

http://paulgraham.com/name.html

If you have a US startup called X and you don't have x.com, you should probably change your name.

The reason is not just that people can't find you. For companies with mobile apps, especially, having the right domain name is not as critical as it used to be for getting users. The problem with not having the .com of your name is that it signals weakness. Unless you're so big that your reputation precedes you, a marginal domain suggests you're a marginal company. Whereas (as Stripe shows) having x.com signals strength even if it has no relation to what you do.

if you think that in a world where most startups want a .com, nGTLDs will sell for more on average then you are dreaming.

 

[slader23]

I am not trying to distort the truth. I don't need to. It is self evident what is true.

http://paulgraham.com/name.html

One essay with no data is nothing other than someone else's opinion, its pure speculation. For something to be self evident, you must source tangible data in which concise conclusions can be made. So far you have not done that in this thread, or in any thread where you tried to bash ngtlds. Stop wasting your time.

 

[dordomai]

One essay with no data is nothing other than someone else's opinion, its pure speculation. Stop wasting your time.

It is, unlike the nonsensical stuff that you post, valuable and reasonable information.

 

[slader23]

It is, unlike the nonsensical stuff that you post, valuable and reasonable information.

Now your just using rhetoric to try and minimize the heat your getting. There is nothing reasonable,sensible or valuable about posting invalid data, twisting others words and trying to belittle the efforts of others. It is very easy to dissect someones logic when it is fallacious and wrong. You need to realize that what you are doing is wrong and not only do your posts brush people the wrong way, it actually has a negative impact towards your image on this forum. Saying that what I've written is nonsensical only proves my point even further because my posts have directly assessed the fallacious and bias assertions you have made, making them clearly visible for everyone to see.


You have been discredited, constantly to the point where I don't take enjoyment from it anymore. Please stop wasting your time.