showcase Metaverse ~ Showcase your names and Discussion Thread~

[DomainBarracksRob]

Hey all figured with the recent .io 6 figure sale and the nice .xyz sale by a follow NP member. We should open a showcase and discussion thread here.

Metaverse is a fast growing keyword, term and niche! Let's share and discuss our name and news.

I've only got One to start with but its a GOOD one my favorite ending keyword on most names.


MetaverseHub.com



Welcome!

 

[sg08]

Se*o/Verse//com

 

[NordTLD]

Metaverse / optimizer dot Com

 

[ET76]

stable,coin,verse .com

 

[MustaAras]

Meta/Ecosystem/org (got inspired by own writing up, after posting it found myself at Dynadot)

 

[NameFu]

Ok, let's don't go that further,

NFT wasn't anything about 3 years ago, now almost any tech/trade/art related person know about it anywhere on the earth yet nft.com is still inactive...

When NFT.com becomes active does it going to kill the other NFT related domain names or gonna make them less desirable ? I'm not sure if you (@NameFu ) familiar with NFTs, there is a website called opensea.io leading the majority of the NFT market and i assume they will take the lead until a better market evolves. But still people are regging or purchasing NFT related domain names mostly, not just for developing also to have a gateway to NFT world. (redirecting)

It's the matter of which mega companies want to be part of metaverse. First big step came from facebook. If microsoft acquires metaverse.com are we able to say FB is the monopol? we will slightly say "Hey FB one second please", and say welcome to Microsoft. If Elon Musk acquires MetaEarth/MetaWorld/MetaMars.com (just an example) than we are in the war of whales. Beside them anybody work on metaverse with/without meta domain names gonna benefit because when meta ecosystem grow if affects everyone who are in.

Ofcourse not all the companies/startups going to use Meta as their name in order to be successful, they might choose unrelated names too (from the opensea example) It will matter how much they put in. But having meta+metaverse name is a gateway for sure.

In conclusion, Meta/Metaverse is not being popular beacuse Facebook heading in. Metaverse gets popular because circumstances take us there and Facebook is the first whale getting advantage of it.

Are you replying to me?

NFTs are a product that everyone already understands anyone and their grand mother can provide. Also NFT.com isn't the name of the most popular social network companies pushing to be "The One NFT", a place to be. Many companies own the names of products and services in dot com and yet there is no perception that they own those industries because everyone knows they can get those things anywhere, in many cases from even non-companies lol.

This is a unique situation. Most people will eventually be educated about what the metaverse is and will know they can go to Metaverses from other companies but how they view the word meta *COULD* (BUT NOT NECESSARILY) already be set if Meta is the first to succeed in this industry as a Metaverse company with products and services in every aspect of the metaverse. The metaverse is a place and Meta is trying to push to be the one Metaverse and they have a good chance at accomplishing this unfortunately, because of the size and amount of influence they have. Even if they don't succeed at being the leading, most influential Metaverse, the threat of the impact on brand perception may be enough to turn businesses away from using Meta in their brand if they're a Metaverse company.

That *POSIBILITY* may be threatening enough to discourage enough businesses from wanting to brand with "Meta" because the using another word outweighs the risks (if they have a brain). I'm not trying to speak in absolutes. I'm communicating reasonable risks that companies are surely noticing.. What I've said relates to Metaverse too but so far no huge company isn't promoting a grand purchase of Metaverse.com. Even so,if that company isn't as influential as FB it may not be much of a branding threat.

On the flip side to this, sometimes companies like to capitalize on being associated with another company that offers a profitable ecosystem to a large amount of people, like how there are many Creators making skins for Roblox for example. In those cases having Meta in your company name can be a benefit, and there may be many in the future that will cater to the Meta community. But companies that are looking to be more indie may want to brand as something else.

We'll see if I'm talking out of my wazoo sooner or later, and if it turns out that I am I will own it. I'm just sharing my sincere thoughts and concerns. I hope I'm wrong and that everyone comes out of this hype cycle with a little more money than what they invested.

That's enough from me on this sub.

 

[Boz]

Metauniverses.info

 

[ecomslice]

I noticed a recently developed MetaIQ.com now changed hands and sitting at uniregisty


Also random Question, think my Electric))Verse in king worth keeping now ?

 

[NameFu]

All depends on how one brands and uses the name, and also length of name.
Let me make up examples, and these would be my order of preference:
1) Metainsure (or Meta Insure)
2) Metainsurance (or Meta Insurance)
3) MetaverseInsure (or Metaverse Insure)
4) MetaverseInsurance (or Metaverse Insurance)

In this case, I prefer Insure vs Insurance as it it shorter.
If you break up into two separate words "Meta Insure", then yes more likelihood of confusion with Facebook Meta branding. But if you keep it "Metainsure", it is very brandable and will not be confused with Facebook. That's why it matters how you use the words. Like Metabar, Metamucil, Metadata, etc these are just some words that have been in use long before Facebook. If you stick with "Metaverse + Long Word", it's going to be long plus Metaverse+ is too generic sounding, all of which makes it less brandable.

So if a large company purchases "Metaverse", are you going to have the same thought that any Metaverse + Word will no longer be valuable since it causes confusion?

If Facebook was named "Uni", is Unicorn, Unicycle, Universe, etc no longer valuable names? Meta is a prefix word like Uni. What if Facebook chose "Omni" or "Mega"? I could go on and on.

P.S. If you don't believe in Meta + Word and own some, feel free to sell to rest of us for reg fee.

Also, I think it will benefit Meta domains if another large, influential company were to brand as Metaverse, because it helps early on to establish the plurality of the industry's use of words like Meta and Metaverse. If Apple and Microsoft start also using the words a lot in their marketing to say "hey look, Meta isn't the only Metaverse company! We also provide it" that would help normie who are uneducated to understand that Meta isn't owned by Meta. But the other issues still remain so it will be up to companies to decide if those risks are still worth the trouble.

P.S. If I were the founder of company planning to go head on to compete with Meta with a similar budget in hopes of establishing its self as the Metaverse... Just me personally... The last name in the world I'd want to brand as is the Metaverse, because i personally would worry about how it could be loosely interested that my co is the verse of Meta or that my co is related to Meta. If I were not planning on competing with a smaller budget than Meta and for a smaller share of the market for a specific aspect of the metaverse industry I'd definitely want to brand as Metaverse.com

 

[Joseph CA]

Metaasaservice

Meta As A Service

.com​

 

[Kamaldeen]

MetaVerxe/com

 

[OnlineDomainShop]

MetaVerxe/com

Good brand able.

 

[Mkt Sales Leads]

Available to reg:

MetaLearnhub.com (MetaLearn.com taken) xMetaArt.com

 

[oldtimer]

If I were the founder of company planning to go head on to compete with Meta with a similar budget in hopes of establishing its self as the Metaverse... Just me personally... The last name in the world I'd want to brand as is the Metaverse, because i personally would worry about how it could be loosely interested that my co is the verse of Meta or that my co is related to Meta. If I were not planning on competing with a smaller budget than Meta and for a smaller share of the market for a specific aspect of the metaverse industry I'd definitely want to brand as Metaverse.com

The fact is that this a well thought of plan that has been executed brilliantly by Meta and now no one really knows how to catch up with them.

Firstly they have managed to get rid of an outdated and to some extent tarnished name and rebrand to a name that is going to define the future.

Secondly as the first movers in this field they have managed to dominate all the media and news channels in a way that Meta and Metaverse are already being ingrained in everyone's mind.

And thirdly by allocating a few million dollars for buying all these domain names in the aftermarket they have created a buzz that is going to cement the dominance of Meta and Metaverse with the thousands and perhaps even millions of Meta and Metaverse related domain names that are now being registered by everyone.

So all and all this has been a plan well executed which has put all the other major companies in the dust.

IMO

 

[Mkt Sales Leads]

MetaVerxe/com

Closest naming in .com to the 'big one' so far. But underpriced since it's on SH.

 

[kite26]

Your opinion for Meta/Vanilla/com please?

 

[Thecryptoinvestor]

MetaIQ.io
MetaHQ.io

 

[Seundavid]

Metavast.net
MetaAnnex.com

 

[NameFu]

The fact is that this a well thought of plan that has been executed brilliantly by Meta and now no one really knows how to catch up with them.

Firstly they have managed to get rid of an outdated and to some extent tarnished name and rebrand to a name that is going to define the future.

Secondly as the first movers in this field they have managed to dominate all the media and news channels in a way that Meta and Metaverse are already being ingrained in everyone's mind.

And thirdly by allocating a few million dollars for buying all these domain names in the aftermarket they have created a buzz that is going to cement the dominance of Meta and Metaverse with the thousands and perhaps even millions of Meta and Metaverse related domain names that are now being registered by everyone.

So all and all this has been a plan well executed which has put all the other major companies in the dust.

IMO

Absolutely. Apple, MS and Google will try to catch up and Apple certainly will in hardware but none of them are likely attempting to create Metaverse and even if they do, no company knows social better than Meta. The biggest competition to Meta will likely come from Epic Games who have a gaming background. MS also has a games department but MS doesn't have the right leadership and attitude about social to get it right IMO. FB is the co most positioned to be "the metaverse" unfortunately.... So prepare for Zuck to have even more control over your digital life. Time to buy to invest in Meta too....

 

[DKN]

Metaverse-Cam.com

Metaverse-Cams.com

 

[BostonDomainer]

Closest naming in .com to the 'big one' so far. But underpriced since it's on SH.

I think Netaverse ./com might be the closest lol. Oh if that N was an M lol one little line