showcase Metaverse ~ Showcase your names and Discussion Thread~

SpaceshipSpaceship
Watch

DomainBarracksRob

Top Member
Impact
8,483
Hey all figured with the recent .io 6 figure sale and the nice .xyz sale by a follow NP member. We should open a showcase and discussion thread here.

Metaverse is a fast growing keyword, term and niche! Let's share and discuss our name and news.

I've only got One to start with but its a GOOD one my favorite ending keyword on most names.


MetaverseHub.com



Welcome! :)
 
49
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
GoDaddyGoDaddy
1
•••
upload_2021-10-29_3-35-16.png


upload_2021-10-29_3-35-37.png

We/Are/Meta(dot)s..reg is coming...
 
1
•••
Screenshot_20211028-232937_Chrome.jpg
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20211028-232937_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20211028-232937_Chrome.jpg
    45.8 KB · Views: 80
2
•••
Did he? or did he Luck out?
I read it the wrong way round. Kudos to him if he regged it first. Looks like he’ll be getting a call from the negotiators.
 
1
•••
1
•••
I'm not sure why people are hesitant on registering meta+KW now thinking Facebook has exclusive rights.

1) Meta is a common word, it's been in use before Facebook today. Trust me, Zuckerberg doesn't own Meta nor Metaverse. Neil should be suing everyone now he came up with the term Metaverse.
2) There are several trademarks on "Meta" already from different registers, all different applicable uses.
3) Even if FB trademarked Meta, they don't automatically own Meta+KW trademarks
4) Meta+KW is not going to go down in value, in fact the opposite, it will go up in value because even FB is using it. It still describes the Metaverse, and it's only going to get bigger. And FB may even buy it from you.
5) IMO, Meta+KW is more valuable than Metaverse+KW, shorter, more brandable, and does not have to relate to Metaverse.

If you don't want your Meta+KWs, send me a PM and sell them to me, I'd gladly buy them from you.
 
11
•••
Haha... Yeah them and the others cos... Lawsuits coming?

Meta.io are probably safe but that is a ton of PR and marketing needed to let people know "yeah, we're Meta, but not that Meta".

As for the other one, if it isn't FB themselves, then they are probably DOA unless they are selling Meat, Eggs, Tacos and Avocado in Somalia.
 
Last edited:
1
•••
They also have Meta.org for their foundation/charity.

So yeah, huge moves.
 
0
•••
Ok, so do we raise our prices or what ?

I mean, just because Zuck is calling it Meta, that doesnt mean everything that is "meta"+keyword is going to sell.

you should lower your prices and sell to me, meta+KW is going to go down in value because Mark is going to come after you
 
1
•••
What is a prepper you guys know?
These are people that stock pile guns, food, supplies, money etc. etc., preplanning for an apocalyptic disaster they believe 'might' come.
 
0
•••
2
•••
I don't think that 28 october matter, what about facebook infringing with 'meta' others TM's like AR headsets, gaming, machine learning? Do you think that they will not be involved in gaming in their metaverse? They will not use headsets? I think that they will choose a particular sign+meta, because it's to general, it's like google's alphabet.

The difference is compared to them, we domain investors (and most other companies) are mere mortals - If i owned Face dot com and Facebook wanted it, even though its generic and not infringing on their trademark, i wouldn't like to battle them in court.

It will be like Real Madrid vs Accrington Stanley.

Whats going to be interesting is if these sales continue. Did Facebook buy some of these domains because they knew domain owners didn't register or buy them in bad faith (no announcement was made), now they have announced it are they going to continue to buy .nets (for example) or try to get them another way (UDRP)?
 
Last edited:
1
•••
you should lower your prices and sell to me, meta+KW is going to go down in value because Mark is going to come after you
😁😁😁🤭
 
0
•••
MetaPay dot delivery
MetaSoftSystems dot com
 
0
•••
These are people that stock pile guns, food, supplies, money etc. etc., preplanning for an apocalyptic disaster they believe 'might' come.

And nfts in the Metaverse
 
0
•••
Every domainer on this thread is a trademark lawyer today with vast experience in litigation lol 😆
 
12
•••
meta+KW is going to go down in value because Mark is going to come after you
yeah that is not gonna happen. Meta is a word used by many for a long time, so FB doesn't have exclusive rights to it.
 
1
•••
I'm not sure why people are hesitant on registering meta+KW now thinking Facebook has exclusive rights.

1) Meta is a common word, it's been in use before Facebook today. Trust me, Zuckerberg doesn't own Meta nor Metaverse. Neil should be suing everyone now he came up with the term Metaverse.
2) There are several trademarks on "Meta" already from different registers, all different applicable uses.
3) Even if FB trademarked Meta, they don't automatically own Meta+KW trademarks
4) Meta+KW is not going to go down in value, in fact the opposite, it will go up in value because even FB is using it. It still describes the Metaverse, and it's only going to get bigger. And FB may even buy it from you.
5) IMO, Meta+KW is more valuable than Metaverse+KW, shorter, more brandable, and does not have to relate to Metaverse.

If you don't want your Meta+KWs, send me a PM and sell them to me, I'd gladly buy them from you.

It's about marketing advantage, and public perception, not rights. But honestly I think Meta + Keyword could still have value in areas that are not in gaming or large XR distribution cases.

A good comparison is when Crypto.com was bought. That didn't stop crypto names from being bought.

One difference though in this scenario is that crypto.com only markets with "crypto.com" and crypto was a known word before the domain was purchased. But I guess the same or similar can be said about the term Meta but so it could be that Meta+Keyword names may not suffer a huge marketing disadvantage.

But Meta dot extension domains are going to suffer hard if they're in XR.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
yeah that is not gonna happen. Meta is a word used by many for a long time, so FB doesn't have exclusive rights to it.

I know, I was being supersarcastic. Read my other thread for all the people worrying.
 
Last edited:
1
•••
I had negotiations with a rich American company about metaverse.ai . I offered it to them for 200,000 euros. After Zuckerberg's speech, they agreed. Just now. Sell or not? It seems that this will be a record for .ai and .io.
 
22
•••
Dynadot — .com TransferDynadot — .com Transfer
CatchedCatched

We're social

Escrow.com
Spaceship
Rexus Domain
CryptoExchange.com
Catchy
CatchDoms
NameMaxi - Your Domain Has Buyers
DomDB
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back