People are always greedyGive the buyer 2 options :
BIN : Best profit for you .
Offer : as second option .
YESi like BINs. Cuts out nonsense, and games.
But knowing how to value them’s another story
People are always greedy
want to make more money
BIN with make offer option
good idea\BIN with make offer option
YESAccording to SquadHelp CEO Darpan, having BIN + Make Offer leads to the worst STR
However, this statement raises some questions.
What kind of data has been used?
I assume this was based on SH statistics.
As we know, most SH names are in the 1500-3000 range, so they probably can't provide enough stats for higher-value names. Maybe what is best for 2K names is not best for 5 or 10K names.
Then, I could be wrong but you can't set BIN + Make Offer for SH Premium listings (you can on WLM though). The question is how the sell-through rate for BIN + MO was calculated when there is no SH data on that?
Finally, a worthwhile question is what if we indeed have a higher sell-through rate for BIN + Installments but an average selling price is higher for BIN + Make Offer? In this case, we would move fewer names but have higher margins so we have to replace fewer names that sold.
So this is a very interesting topic![]()
thanks for your sharingAccording to SquadHelp CEO Darpan, having BIN + Make Offer leads to the worst STR
However, this statement raises some questions.
What kind of data has been used?
I assume this was based on SH statistics.
As we know, most SH names are in the 1500-3000 range, so they probably can't provide enough stats for higher-value names. Maybe what is best for 2K names is not best for 5 or 10K names.
Then, I could be wrong but you can't set BIN + Make Offer for SH Premium listings (you can on WLM though). The question is how the sell-through rate for BIN + MO was calculated when there is no SH data on that?
Finally, a worthwhile question is what if we indeed have a higher sell-through rate for BIN + Installments but an average selling price is higher for BIN + Make Offer? In this case, we would move fewer names but have higher margins so we have to replace fewer names that sold.
So this is a very interesting topic![]()
Not with Dangood idea\
- Is it a little difficult to implement?
According to SquadHelp CEO Darpan, having BIN + Make Offer leads to the worst STR
However, this statement raises some questions.
What kind of data has been used?
I assume this was based on SH statistics.
As we know, most SH names are in the 1500-3000 range, so they probably can't provide enough stats for higher-value names. Maybe what is best for 2K names is not best for 5 or 10K names.
Then, I could be wrong but you can't set BIN + Make Offer for SH Premium listings (you can on WLM though). The question is how the sell-through rate for BIN + MO was calculated when there is no SH data on that?
Finally, a worthwhile question is what if we indeed have a higher sell-through rate for BIN + Installments but an average selling price is higher for BIN + Make Offer? In this case, we would move fewer names but have higher margins so we have to replace fewer names that sold.
So this is a very interesting topic![]()
So is there the possibility of a BIN + ONO? And would this get rid of the price confusion end users might have when looking at BIN + Offer.
Because the guy believes the BIN+Offer is least effective, I'm going to try and nail my pricing and just BIN everything at a price that satisfies me.
I'm not sure what ONO means, can you clarify please?

