staffjam said:
Currently none except to dispute it in a court of competent jurisdiction, which
is in the U.S. in this case.
npcomplete said:
It means that nobody can ever truly own rights to property of any kind.
You know, I recently read an interesting take from a lawyer on such. He said
that nowadays it's not a question of who owns what, but what rights all the
involved parties have agreed upon for that particular item.
Your rights are only as good as your ability to enforce it. Unfortunately rights
are challenged every other day, especially by those who seem to be in much
greater position to do so.
Should Elequa have changed lawyers?
gazzip said:
Sucks big time that something so generic can be TMarked
IBM...AOL...GE...are they not trademarks as well despite being generic letters,
long before domain names came into existence?
Folks, try not to confuse "law" with justice. Such things are intended to try to
resolve disputes without resorting to bloodshed, although they can be abused
just like everything else in life.