Well thanks for your advice.
It seems to me you haven't read what I had to say.
When you say the keywords return 997 results by
not space-seperating them and putting them into quotationmarks, that's misleading.
Your example with "nighty man" is not the same because
you have space-seperated the two terms in quotationmarks and it still only delivers around 100 results.
In the example with my domain you had left out the space between the two words the term consists of plus put it in quotation marks. You searched for "infrastructurelibrary" which in fact only delivers around 1000 results.
When you search for "infrastructure library" (space-seperated and in quotation marks) you get around 1 million results.
Moreover
"Nighty Man" is not a well-known term in any field of business or trading or whatever.
Whereas
"Infrastructure Library" is a specialized term consisting of keywords used in conjunction exactly the same way in a
multi million dollar businesss that changes all kind of organisations all around the world nowadays.
In fact it's not only a term of this standard,
it's the standars's name.
In your appraisals in my other thread, you valuated domains that get far less results when searched in the same way around low $xxx. Here we have imo a much better domain that represents a keywoard combination that fits much better than the other ones like "rock special" etc.. and you use a different appraisal technique to say it's worthless. That's what I don't understand.
Maybe it's a taste thing. I don't know.. But comparing your appraisals of my domains I'd say you haven't developped a consistant appraisal technique yet.
I said in my opening post that the domain's keywords were not randomly chosen. I asure you, most of the times I register only the best ones or most valuable ones out of the ones I preselect and evaluate. Very often I think too long and someone else is quicker than me in his decisions
Your advice about stopping to reg domains is surely meant well, but I still think it was a good decision to reg this one.
