.info .info Vs. .Net

[armin]

whcih domain would get better .info or .net i say .net because it is used more then .info in sites.

 

[harkster]

Yeah, .nets are definately better though. I mean has a .info ever sold for more than $5000? Nobody seems to like them much.

Answer = yes:
Best.info £12,000 = $20,880 Sedo 7/19/05
Musical.info €10,440 = $13,936 Sedo 3/8/05
Maschinenbau.info ("building engines" in German) €5,950 = $7,772 Sedo 4/19/05
Wetten.info ("bet" in German) €5,750 = $6,895 Pvt Sale 10/11/05
TravelNet.info €5,000 = $6,231 Sedo 9/6/05
Dad.info $5,556 Sedo 11/1/05
Broker.info $5,000 Sedo 5/31/05
Golfreisen.info ("golf travel" in German) €4,000 = $4,906 Sedo 9/13/05

Source = DNJournal domain sales report.

 

[SpongyBob]

Ah, ok
..........

Sedo seems to do well with sales. Strange how there's no Afternic, unless they don't supply the info.

 

[chrisxx]

.net IMO, but i like travel names with .info

 

[sm]

for information sites, .info (though it really depends on the specific name).
In general, .net in those cases, where one wanted to register a .com but it was not available.

so, a .info is completely different from a .com in terms of applicability.
a .net is much more similar to a .com in that sense.

 

[mole]

a .net is much more similar to a .com in that sense.

Agreed, the .NET extension is seen as the poor cousin of .COM.

.INFO is in a league of its own;
http://www.alberteinstein.info

 

[andyy15]

.net for sure agree with everyone above. .info is not as popular and is best used for informative sites.

 

[wasistdas]

despite whatever reason i used to consider .net than .info than .org

 

[harkster]

Agreed, the .NET extension is seen as the poor cousin of .COM.

.INFO is in a league of its own;
http://www.alberteinstein.info

That Albert... is so flat a** cool!! :tu:

 

[barefoottech]

Yes Info and Net have different uses

Case in point
BareFootTech owns a few .info's (including BareFootTech .info)
But my home site is Barefoottech.NET (and I have the .com)

 

[SeanPreston]

.nets are da best

i think .nets are better but .infos are cheaper.

 

[armin]

Agreed, the .NET extension is seen as the poor cousin of .COM.

.INFO is in a league of its own;
http://www.alberteinstein.info

how is .com simmilar to .net. One .com means company i think and .net means network. two .com is more popluar then .net.