UDRP GramlinDisposable.com UDRP: Case win for Respondent despite passing off as the Complainant

[News]

The domain GramlinDisposable.com was the focus on a UDRP brought forth by Gold Flora Corporation. The Complainant’s GRAMLIN trademark was applied for in January 2024, followed by the registration of their brand’s domain, GramlinMode.com.

Read More.

 

[Gabriel360]

The panelist made a bad call.

But the complainant's attorney wasn't that thorough, either. Someone like @jberryhill would have gotten them a win.

For instance, the panelist says that they do not have sufficient evidence of using their Gramlin mark until December 2024 when they launched their website.

But that's NOT true.

That's only true about Gramlinmode.com website. But on their other website (caliva.com), they have evidence of using the mark on this page caliva.com/brand/gramlin as far back as April 2024.

Plus, the respondent just simply STOLE their logo, their website design and their products.

It's an obvious case of cybersquatting. The "without prejudice" is not nearly enough considering the damage that the respondent could do to their brand before they have enough evidence to file again.

Overall, this looks like a really bad call by the panelist.