- Impact
- 211
Another disturbing transfer.
http://www.udrpsearch.com/naf/1627997
The complainant was chef Lidia Bastianich, who sells cookware under the Lidia brand.
Lidia is a female first name and the domain owner was not violating the Lidia cooking TM. Reading through the ruling it seems as though the domain owner lost the domain pretty much because they weren't using it.
This ruling and others like it point to a UDRP culture among some panelists that encourages complainant favoritism. If this was my domain I'd get this into the US courts in time to stop the UDRP transfer order. There is no TM violation here.
http://www.udrpsearch.com/naf/1627997
The complainant was chef Lidia Bastianich, who sells cookware under the Lidia brand.
Lidia is a female first name and the domain owner was not violating the Lidia cooking TM. Reading through the ruling it seems as though the domain owner lost the domain pretty much because they weren't using it.
This ruling and others like it point to a UDRP culture among some panelists that encourages complainant favoritism. If this was my domain I'd get this into the US courts in time to stop the UDRP transfer order. There is no TM violation here.