- Impact
- 72
Hello,
I remember seeing (but not really reading) an article a while back saying that it's bad to have your domain showing the same content with the "www." in the URL, as without it in the URL.
I also found a blog post on a large webmaster site (titled "example.com vs. www.example.com… trouble!") about this, and the points it given for arguing this is fair enough.
I'm wondering what you all think of this? Is it worth forwarding traffic from example.com to www.example.com?
I have a website, and the www.xxx.org URL has a PR 5, with the xxx.org URL having a PR of 0? I'd like to know if there is something to this, and what's the best method of automatically directing traffic to the www.xxx.org version?
Thanks,
Tristan
I remember seeing (but not really reading) an article a while back saying that it's bad to have your domain showing the same content with the "www." in the URL, as without it in the URL.
I also found a blog post on a large webmaster site (titled "example.com vs. www.example.com… trouble!") about this, and the points it given for arguing this is fair enough.
I'm wondering what you all think of this? Is it worth forwarding traffic from example.com to www.example.com?
I have a website, and the www.xxx.org URL has a PR 5, with the xxx.org URL having a PR of 0? I'd like to know if there is something to this, and what's the best method of automatically directing traffic to the www.xxx.org version?
Thanks,
Tristan








