Thanks
@Grilled.
I don't think she is as smart as you. In fact, I am not even sure she is using a real identity, or for that matter the rest of the chain of command of that operation that has now been revealed at least in part.
I appreciate the compliment, though I respectfully disagree. Maybe I hold too much trust in Wikipedia. But I believe, well guessing, by the way Molly presents herself online, in her responses, that she is indeed as smart, if not smarter than I. And even then, I don't think it's about being smart, as opposed to other human aspects.
Since I know you are real, and smart, maybe you can figure out how to navigate her hoops and edit her Wiki article.
I don't have much, if any, experience editing wikipedia articles. And with this being an issue that supposedly reaches the likes of George Soros, I'm not sure how qualified, or knowledgeable my opinion will be. I think, this is why Wikipedia has a publishing process centered around citing information.
Any friction that you, or
@Intelliname were facing on Wikipedia, was likely rooted to similar issues you/epik has encountered on nP. The feeling that some of yours, or epik affiliated members, were more marketing statements, or an influenced marketing opinion, rather than being a unbiased opinion, or fact. I hope Molly sees TLDInvestors as independent, the only friction I see, might lie with intellinames long comments on TLDInvestors, that definitely read like he is connected to epik in more fashion than just a customer. For somebody who claims to fight larger media narratives, I'm honestly dumbfounded how you, or intelliname, don't see how it (the marketing narrative it appears epik pushes) may look to the general public. e.g. continually calling out GoDaddy... why? Because they are the biggest? Because, to the general public, Epiks greatest claim to fame was when they stepped in to house Gab when GoDaddy gave them the boot? Still chasing the business from the far right no matter the cost?
Apparently
@Paul Buonopane could not figure it out.
I didn't think your request to Paul was serious. Seeing how it sounded condescending.
But as I can see this is an issue for you, with possible negative implications for epik customers (specifically to those using epik landing pages), I will try to mustard up "whatever it is that it takes to reach out to people" and see if I can't edit EPIKs wikipedia article. Not sure why you think calling it her article will help.
Perhaps you, intelliname, or another epik staff member (heck, even other nP members/epik customers) can post here, what they'd like to see changed. As the forum as a whole, is a much greater source than just I. If you post here, things you think should be added or changed, namePros members might help validate/invalidate your requests, and as such, it would give me (or another requester) a baseline of an understanding of what you want articulated in the wikipedia article. Hoping you realize wikipedia entries aren't designed to be a marketing, or advertising medium, and will keep your expectations reasonable.
If it were solely up to me, I would certainly add some of the good epik is doing, or has done. Though, I would be fair, and I would add things such as warehousing, and other area's that might not shine a positive light on epik. However, it's not up to me. It's apparently up to citable sources. Some of which may be easier to find/validate than others. It's not a perfect process. But it's their process. That may be an unfortunate reality to you. I invite you to keep doing good things to be reported on, then we'll have more to cite. GoDaddy forwarded Coronavirus.com to the WHO, and banned similar domains from being sold on their marketplace. I don't care if that's positive or negative, that appears to be the facts. Whereas Epik took a different stance, to allow these type of domains to be sold. Again, I don't care if it's right or wrong. This is just citable verifiable instances.
Carry on; it's none of my business.
