alert Epik Had A Major Breach

[DaveX]

Just read this. Looks like Epik may have been hacked and sensitive data compromised...

Read here:
https://domainnamewire.com/2021/09/14/hackers-claim-significant-epik-breach/

Thought I would share this.

 

[Molly White]

Umm no, this thread is about the illegal breach of Epik. Who did the breach? Anonymous. Who claims to be the founder of anonymous? Aubrey. Was he directly involved in the hack? I don't know, he should tell us.

Mr. Peterson's suggestion that you read back through the thread is a good one. Kirtaner has already answered this.

 

[shoulda9393]

Mr. Peterson's suggestion that you read back through the thread is a good one. Kirtaner has already answered this.

I'd like to hear him talk about any role or lack thereof in the hack as much as possible actually. The more the better. Helps a lot when he does.

He seems to like talking about himself and his activities.

 

[Future Sensors]

Umm no, this thread is about the illegal breach of Epik. Who did the breach? Anonymous. Who claims to be the founder of anonymous? Aubrey. Was he directly involved in the hack? I don't know, he should tell us.

This guy is a hacker.

https://hucksters.net/person/joseph-camp

From that page, and as reported in the Washington post:

"Melissa Lewis, a self-described anti-fascist activist and writer in Portland, Ore., said her family spent months feeling “hunted” by far-right troll and convicted hacker Joseph “Joey” Camp, whose name was listed on domain registrations with Epik and who has claimed publicly to have done freelance work for Monster."​

 

[shoulda9393]

This guy is a hacker.

I don't like Joey Camp, but unfortunately, this thread is about the Epik breach by a crime syndicate Aubrey claims to be the founder of. Cute that a Wikipedia admin defends him in public though while also editing on the topic. Might be worth noting to Wikipedia.

 

[Molly White]

Cute that a Wikipedia admin defends him in public though while also editing on the topic. Might be worth noting to Wikipedia.

Not sure how telling you that the question was asked and answered is "defending him in public", but sure, go for it.

 

[shoulda9393]

Not sure how telling you that the question was asked and answered is "defending him in public", but sure, go for it.

You have been defending him in public, and he has been retweeting you, positively, on related matters.

 

[Future Sensors]

You have been defending him in public, and he has been retweeting you, positively, on related matters.

As much as I understand your reasoning, in practice it is much more complicated as an outsider to point out who is responsible. You can't hold someone accountable on the basis of a retweet. The authorities will research this much more thoroughly.

As for Molly, I've seen her document the breach very extensively and neutrally, with citations and sources included. She does not take a position on this. In the meantime she has to deal with personal attacks that come from Epik. I wouldn't be surprised if Molly's good work and transcripts can be of service to law enforcement. But as mentioned before, the chance of actual prosecution in these cases is generally small.

 

[shoulda9393]

As much as I understand your reasoning, in practice it is much more complicated as an outsider to point out who is responsible. You can't hold someone accountable on the basis of a retweet. The authorities will research this much more thorough.

As for Molly, I've seen her document the breach very extensively and neutrally, with citations and sources included. She does not take a position on this. In the meantime she has to deal with personal attacks that come from Epik. I wouldn't be surprised if Molly's good work and transcripts can be of service to law enforcement. But as mentioned before, the chance of actual prosecution in these cases is generally small.

Most of her commentary on Twitter is taunting and making fun of Rob. So yea she has a position. But this whole Joey/Molly seems like a (perhaps accidental) smokescreen for whoever might actually know who the hackers were. I would assume someone claiming to be the founder of a crime syndicate taking credit for the hack might know, but maybe he doesn't.

If he did know, he would say he doesn't know. But if he keeps talking with the purpose of drawing attention to himself, within a few years he might accidentally reveal something about his knowledge of the event. This of course is all assuming Anonymous doesn't fall into drama out each other out, which has happened in Anonymous before.

 

[Future Sensors]

Most of her commentary on Twitter is taunting and making fun of Rob. So yea she has a position. But this whole Joey/Molly seems like a (perhaps accidental) smokescreen for whoever might actually know who the hackers were. I would assume someone claiming to be the founder of a crime syndicate taking credit for the hack might know, but maybe he doesn't.

If he did know, he would say he doesn't know. But if he keeps talking with the purpose of drawing attention to himself, within a few years he might accidentally reveal something about his knowledge of the event.

Very interesting, but as long as you don't come up with harder evidence, this won't get you anywhere.

 

[shoulda9393]

Very interesting, but as long as you don't come up with harder evidence, this won't get you anywhere.

I don't think she had anything to do with the literal act of the hack itself. That's some weird gaslighting thing people keep doing to move the goalposts from Aubrey's Anonymous connections to Molly. It's just dumb having potential cheerleaders for founders of crime syndicates in here.

 

[Future Sensors]

I don't think she had anything to do with the hack. That's some weird gaslighting thing people keep doing to move the goalposts from Aubrey from Molly. It's just dumb having potential cheerleaders for founders of crime syndicates in here.

I'd like to hear some more concrete things from you than this. I can also come up with a thousand theories, but that doesn't help us much.

 

[shoulda9393]

I'd like to hear some more concrete things from you than this. I can also come up with a thousand theories, but that doesn't help us much.

Until Anonymous rats each other out like they always do, all that can be done is sit back and watch I guess. Probably will occur on Twitter through accounts claiming to be in or formerly in Anonymous.

 

[Future Sensors]

Until Anonymous rats each other out like they always do, all that can be done is sit back and watch I guess. Probably will occur on Twitter and it won't involve Molly, but rather the members of Anonymous.

Thank you for defending Molly. Appreciate it.

 

[shoulda9393]

Thank you for defending Molly. Appreciate it.

You really need to go to a thread you have relevance to. This thread should only be for those effected by the hack as customers or potential buyers.

 

[Molly White]

You really need to go to a thread you have relevance to. This thread should only be for those effected by the hack as customers or potential buyers.

Is that you? When you joined NamePros and this thread a day ago, you said you were an "uninvolved outlooker".

 

[shoulda9393]

Is that you? When you joined NamePros and this thread a day ago, you said you were an "uninvolved outlooker".

Turns out most people effected by the hack don't use any particular forum. You on the other hand insist on becoming involved not only as a non-customer, but as someone with a very long vendetta as a...
..

..
..

Wikipedia admin

This thread is directed toward and for those effected by the epik breach as domain owners, so I joined as someone who fits that description.

 

[Molly White]

Turns out most people effected by the hack don't use any particular forum. You on the other hand insist on becoming involved not only as a non-customer, but as someone with a very long vendetta as a...
..

..
..

Wikipedia admin

I'm not the one trying to gatekeep who can post in this thread, though, am I?

This thread is directed toward and for those effected by the epik breach as domain owners, so I joined as someone who fits that description.

As for your edit, I own a domain too

Gatekeeping is dumb, and I think a lot of "outsiders" or whoever that have posted here (including yourself) have valuable perspective. If the mods think my posts are offtopic or want to more narrowly dictate the scope of this thread, I have no objections to that and will happily abide any instructions. But I'm not interested in backseat-forum-modding (either participating in it myself by trying to define the types of people who can or can't post here, or trying to abide by all the various and contradictory ways different posters here think this thread ought to be run).

 

[Future Sensors]

This thread should only be for those effected by the hack as customers or potential buyers.

I'm not sure if this thread can accommodate 15MM people that were affected by the breach.

 

[shoulda9393]

I'm not sure if this thread can accomodate 15MM people that were affected by the breach.

Most have no idea it happened. Partially because most outlets found it unethical to make noise on behalf of trolls who wanted it, ie these hackers.

 

[Beezy]

the "crime syndicate" exposer has logged on.