

Thats true.VURG said:If I was going for acronyms, I think the pool of remaining L-L-L.com has more potentially good domains.
AussieDomainer said:Depends greatly on the quality/combinations. However overall I think I prefer L-L-L.com, especially out of the remaining ones for both groups. I own 600+ of each and have been registering L-L-L.com like made lately but haven't registered any LLLL.com in about a month.
I think L-L-L.com have much more potential for end user meaning/sales than bad letter combos of LLLL.com :imho:
I was debating between picking up another CVCV.com or picking up a LLL.net. Any reason for CVCV.com over LLL.net?sashas said:CVCV.coms over even LLL.nets
accentnepal said:Dunnow about L-L-L.com. I had a couple high premiums picked out from a list awhile ago - never regged them. So I own zero of them. It seems like a jump in logic that end-users will go for them - could happen, but I dunnow.
I think I do know about LLLL.coms. They are right smack in the path of internet/domain name growth, as far as I can see. They cost the same as L-L-Ls. Seem less risky. I own a bunch of LLLL.coms, stopped regging a couple months ago, Don't want to dilute the quality, renewals cost the same for junk. Miss the thrill of the chase.
Just came out that way.sashas said:dude...you talk like Johnny Depp from Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas!
accentnepal said:Dunnow about L-L-L.com. I had a couple high premiums picked out from a list awhile ago - never regged them. So I own zero of them. It seems like a jump in logic that end-users will go for them - could happen, but I dunnow.

