That's 'turnkeys' and not 'turkeys' for those of you who speed read :hehe:
I often lurk around NamePro (notice the lack of posts vs time registered!). I'm finding that the Developed Websites forum is less useful lately. Lots of people are listing developed sites that have "just launched" or "all ready to go". In my opinion (which might be wrong!) I don't really consider such sites to be truly developed.
Is there anyway we can ensure the sites listed are truly developed rather than just a domain with a turnkey site or a site with a forum with 10 members. The easiest way would be to have a minimum time period a site has to be online - I would think 6 months would be considered developed. But then again, it's going to be hard to prove. Perhaps we can just kick threads out if they are blatant shell/turnkey/brand new sites? I'd be happy to volunteer.
My two cents.
I often lurk around NamePro (notice the lack of posts vs time registered!). I'm finding that the Developed Websites forum is less useful lately. Lots of people are listing developed sites that have "just launched" or "all ready to go". In my opinion (which might be wrong!) I don't really consider such sites to be truly developed.
Is there anyway we can ensure the sites listed are truly developed rather than just a domain with a turnkey site or a site with a forum with 10 members. The easiest way would be to have a minimum time period a site has to be online - I would think 6 months would be considered developed. But then again, it's going to be hard to prove. Perhaps we can just kick threads out if they are blatant shell/turnkey/brand new sites? I'd be happy to volunteer.
My two cents.















