It is belief that source data prices for Artificial Intelligence companies to use are too low and this inflates the value of AI stock. This is where artists, scientists and media groups are paying huge amounts of money to develop high quality data for their community and AI companies are making huge amounts of money using their data for developing AI and underpaying the source data developers.
That is why I believe there is an urgency in developing decentralised cyber security methods to protect source data providers from being underpaid for their work. This is why I believe that when higher standards of data price negotiations between source data developers and AI companies exist, a potential AI bubble may happen as AI company valuations are often based on unsustainably low source data prices. This may need a market correction in the AI industry as people wake up to the realities of being underpaid for their work.
For most people, they don't understand that decentralised cyber security methods are possible and they fail to recognise the value of their purpose. My position is that higher standards of cyber security protection is needed for the smaller communities and individuals who get underpaid for their work. There is sufficient evidence of underpayment for source data and a failure of large companies to provide appropriate compensation and hence there is a need for individuals and communities to work together through developing independent cyber security systems.
I am an advocate of leaner AI systems that pay higher renumeration to source data developers as I believe that this raises the standard of source data in the long term and reduces the proliferance of #AISlop. I believe expansion and development of decentralised cyber security is the necessary technology to help protect communities from being underpaid for their work.
In summary, I am in the bear camp with current AI company valuations and my belief is that AI source data needs higher compensation. While I am in the bear camp, my position is that this bear status may be temporary as there is good long term opportunities in the AI space. Decentralised Cyber Security is the necessary technology to achieve this. I am also with the belief that in the long term, higher standards of AI will be developed when source data is appropriately numerated. I am also in the niche camp (as opposed to generic) with AI company technology and decentralised cyber security will expand this faster. Therefore I see long term potential in the expansion of the .ai domain extension and the growth in demand for more niche AI categories are needed. I see Decentralised Cyber Security to be a powerful long term catalyst in expanding the reach of .ai domain names.
*My background is as a mathematician who has had a 20+ year interest in the mathematical field of combinatorics. Combinatorics is a mathematical field that has a range of applications in Cyber Security.
That is why I believe there is an urgency in developing decentralised cyber security methods to protect source data providers from being underpaid for their work. This is why I believe that when higher standards of data price negotiations between source data developers and AI companies exist, a potential AI bubble may happen as AI company valuations are often based on unsustainably low source data prices. This may need a market correction in the AI industry as people wake up to the realities of being underpaid for their work.
For most people, they don't understand that decentralised cyber security methods are possible and they fail to recognise the value of their purpose. My position is that higher standards of cyber security protection is needed for the smaller communities and individuals who get underpaid for their work. There is sufficient evidence of underpayment for source data and a failure of large companies to provide appropriate compensation and hence there is a need for individuals and communities to work together through developing independent cyber security systems.
I am an advocate of leaner AI systems that pay higher renumeration to source data developers as I believe that this raises the standard of source data in the long term and reduces the proliferance of #AISlop. I believe expansion and development of decentralised cyber security is the necessary technology to help protect communities from being underpaid for their work.
In summary, I am in the bear camp with current AI company valuations and my belief is that AI source data needs higher compensation. While I am in the bear camp, my position is that this bear status may be temporary as there is good long term opportunities in the AI space. Decentralised Cyber Security is the necessary technology to achieve this. I am also with the belief that in the long term, higher standards of AI will be developed when source data is appropriately numerated. I am also in the niche camp (as opposed to generic) with AI company technology and decentralised cyber security will expand this faster. Therefore I see long term potential in the expansion of the .ai domain extension and the growth in demand for more niche AI categories are needed. I see Decentralised Cyber Security to be a powerful long term catalyst in expanding the reach of .ai domain names.
*My background is as a mathematician who has had a 20+ year interest in the mathematical field of combinatorics. Combinatorics is a mathematical field that has a range of applications in Cyber Security.
Last edited:
