Complainant Got A Real Spanking

[Dave_Z]

Just finished reading this UDRP decision from my email:

http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/2006/d2006-1392.html

All that supplemental filings and they still lost. :D

 

[labrocca]

lol nice read. Great thread title btw.

 

[fonzie_007]

In the Panel’s view this evidence is insufficient to show that the Complainant has proved trademark rights. The Panel notes that it is well-established that a trademark application alone is not sufficient evidence to establish complainant rights in a mark for the purposes of the Policy. See, e.g., First Tuesday Limited v. The Startup Generator and Christopher Stammer, WIPO Case No. D2000-1732; or Monty and Pat Roberts, Inc. v. J. Bartell, WIPO Case No. D2000-0300.

This was the most enlightening paragraph of the decision IMO.

 

[MrPasha]

Just finished reading this UDRP decision from my email:

http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/2006/d2006-1392.html

All that supplemental filings and they still lost. :D

NICE FIND Dave,,, thanks.