NameSilo

Brandroot are after Brandbucket listed names

Spaceship Spaceship
Watch
Hello everyone.

Here is part of an eMail I got today from Brandroot. I have some names listed at Brandbucket; and Brandroot are offering incentives to transfer them.


"If you're interested in listing free with us, respond to this message for your personal coupon key, which you must use when you are on the edit domain details page (before you verify the name.)

Additionally, if you are interested in moving your names from BrandBucket to Brandroot, we offer great incentives to do so, including double the free listings, lower commission paid to us for the names you move over, and featured listings on a select few. If this interests you, please respond with the list of names you would move over and we will get back to you with what we can offer you and the names we would like to take to our site.

We have had a couple of individuals who have taken this opportunity and even sold a couple that were moved over within a month of being on our site. If you're not getting the expected results from your brandables at BrandBucket, give Brandroot an honest try. You most likely won't regret it.


Keep in mind that BrandBucket requires a 30 days notice for any names moved from their site."


I guess they're after everyones business in an aggressive way. I haven't sold any thing at Brandbucket; but I will leave my names there for now.

Regards

Ralph.
 
1
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
Companies have now caught onto the whole "brandable domain" charade. I can hand reg 10 brandables tomorrow that are better than 60% of the trite they have on their site, and so can other companies.

I will be dumping a lot of "brandables" unless they are TRULY good quality brandable names, unlike "janinja", "cheatly", "jurable", "okebu" etc...

It's just gibberish with a price tag.

Single word, or two word short .COM's that make sense are truly brandable, and companies are willing to pay $30k and up for quality names instead of spending $2,000 on junk.

Their "free listing" strategy is a bit of desperation as well, they know whats going on, and what's to come of 'brandables'.

Glad someone has the nads to speak up about this nonsense. Think of a cutesy-pie word or word combination (the more absurd the better!) and stick a lame $2 logo next to it and pretend you know jack sh*t about marketing sense. What a joke.

While I completely agree that the brandable marketplace is ridiculous compared to standard domaining and has been hyped up far too much by new domainers looking for an easy "lottery" without putting in the time and money to register aftermarket domains, I think you guys are being a bit ignorant.

First off, why would companies just now have this sudden epiphany that it's all a charade? 7 years ago theses companies could have hand regged 10 brandables that would be even better than those 10 you could go reg now, yet they've still managed to pump 7 figures into brandbucket alone since then.

I'm not sure what you're expecting to happen, but I don't think brandables and the brandable marketplaces are going anywhere. Contrary to your beliefs, I actually think brandable marketplaces are genius from a marketing standpoint and most definitely an entrepreneurial standpoint. Only briefly skimming over the way Margot formed BB I'm not sure if she just got lucky and it kind of fell in her lap as she was trying to trim the fat from her portfolio, or if she shares the same views that I do, but so many people bash brandables and call the marketplace stupid, but the issue is stupid domainers. 1st look at it from an economic perspective, and forgive me for this upcoming tangent.

Every single day people start online and offline businesses big and small , develop apps, software and games, create new products, foods, technologies, and so much more. For the most part these individuals, companies, startups, products, and so on are all going to need a name/brand, which means there is a massive demand, and as economics 101 has taught us, demand facilitates the creation of markets.

So as we all know the huge demand for names, the same demand that is the reason domaining even exists, results in a market that's even more huge. Huge markets with huge demand allow for segmentation. With market segments catered to different types of consumers there will be some that have a large budget and see a 30k+ generic keyword domain as the most suitable option or the best fit for their brand, but the amount of companies that realize value in domain names, can afford $30k+ premium name, AND find the exact generic keyword/s that match their service or product is waaaaayy fewer than in any of the other domain markets.

The majority of endusers, however, couldn't fathom spending that amount on a domain name, and wouldn't have the budget to do so even if they could. Several won't even see the value in a quality name, and do just as you said by picking up a handreg themselves. That still leaves thousands and thousands of end users that look to the aftermarkets for a name and they likely don't have an issue investing $xxx-$2xxx in their brand.

Some people even prefer brandable names over generic keywords, and I'm often one of them. (I hate saying this because the name listser is my only brandable I don't like lol..oops) But if I create a product, business, app, game, anything that I plan on maintaining and building long-term, I would prefer a name that I can build a brand on instead of a keyword name10 times out of 10. For instance something like 3dprinter.com which let's say costs $100,000. I would kill to have this domain for domaining purposes, but a 6 letter pronouncable name that I found and loved for $2,000 and $98,000 for brand building and awareness would take the cake everytime. Some names I can understand, but I've never understood the ungodly amounts of money some people pay for generic keywords and EMDs, then just get outranked for their own domain keywords by quality content and better SEO.

Before the brandable marketplace came into existence though, anyone who just wanted a brandable name instead of a keyword name didn't really have a way to target them. Sedo and GD are so ridiculously overloaded with names for sale that most of the names listed will never even get noticed, especially if the domain doesn't have any root word to search for, and browsing categories to look for them becomes overwhelming. When taking into account an enduser that is unfamiliar with the platforms, the marketplaces are the furthest thing from user friendly. So like every successful entrepreneur in history, BrandBucket noticed a demand that wasn't being met, created a market to meet the demand, and the market has only grown since. In addition, the "cheap $2 logos" made shopping much more user friendly and allowed for domains to stand out instead of run together like the pages and pages of 200 domains listed in 12px font. And all they had to do to improve their marketplace was offer designers the possibility of $100 that didn't even come out of BBs cut. And in true monopoly fashion they charged the highest comissions in the industry, but still had people lining up to get names approved because brandable sales were nearly impossible before their market came along.

Finally wrapping this rant up, the brandable sites have used seo to target actual brandable enduser keyword phrases and searches. And I've done some seo and developing of brand related websites in the past, and the industry is much larger than you would think. Brand development and consulting keywords are all around $9+ cpc on average. You give humanity too much credit by saying they could just go reg their own, because a ton of people have no creativity whatsoever, and aren't aware of what makes a domain valuable. With keyword domains you can tell which names have been taken for years, but with most brandables you can't differentiate. And even if you hand-regged it a few weeks back, the enduser buying it could care less, because it was a domain that stood out to them and suited their needs giving it a $xxxx value that they didn't see in any aged premium keyword names.

The same way that domaining became less profitable and died down a few years back when it became popular and seemed easy, the brandables will become less profitable and seem to die down because everyone saw people actually selling domains that they made up and hand-regged for xxxx, so every swinging dick regged the first 20 they could find for a chance to get rich quick. It's disappointing so many crap names did just get added, but after looking at a list of 680 domains that sold on BB and seeing name after name that I would never even think to waste reg fee on, anything is possible I guess..

Wow I just went on a roll and wrote a damn novel..
 
6
•••
You have to have quality brandable domains, or have such a high volume that the law of averages plays in your favor.

If you take out the word "brandable" you have described every domain portfolio holder.

You have to have quality domains, or have such a high volume that the law of averages plays in your favor.

I guess I don't understand why people get so worked up and are quick to foreshadow the downfall of others. BB/Namerific/BR aren't doing anything to discredit the domaining industry. They are making money, are helping others make money, and operate ethical businesses. With all the vitriol going on, you would think they are running a pyramid scheme or something.
 
5
•••
Sold my first domain today at Brandroot. The transaction was quick and smooth. I got paid within an hour after pushing the domain.
 
4
•••
I don't like it. That kind of business tactics smacks of desperation. Slightly unethical in my view.
In this industry calling something "slightly unethical" is almost like a better business bureau A+ rating.
 
Last edited:
4
•••
...
Here is part of an eMail I got today from Brandroot. I have some names listed at Brandbucket; and Brandroot are offering incentives to transfer them.
...
I don't like it. That kind of business tactics smacks of desperation. Slightly unethical in my view.

I will be dumping a lot of "brandables" unless they are TRULY good quality brandable names, unlike "janinja", "cheatly", "jurable", "okebu" etc...
'Brandables' are not all equal. Some are good, some are very good, some are just creative but not outstanding, some would qualify as garbage but this can be subjective too...

Nowadays domainers attach the 'brandable' label to any meaningless or unpronounceable domain. But the true really good brandable domains are not that many... I don't these names qualify as really good quality brandables.

I actually think BB used to own better inventory, but now that they opened the flood gates to domainers, the quality is lower due to relaxed selection criteria.
 
3
•••
sorry, but you only "assist" in their marketing campaign, by creating such threads.


and that... may be the intent.

imo....
 
3
•••
Companies are still way behind domainers and most tech.

I worked in pharmaceutical advertising when I graduated college in 2002. I was in a meeting at GlaxoSmithKline and the marketing manager was talking about how they had just printed an ad and selected it's ad-buys already, so they weren't able to free up any money for our proposal.

While I was looking at the ad, I noticed something... they didn't include their URL on the AD.

Now here was a room of ad execs, brand managers, and VP's and nobody had noticed that their URL wasn't on the AD they just spent half a million dollars to produce and run.

Companies are always years behind technology and its usage, but that doesn't mean that they wont' catch up eventually.

Now they have caught up.

Companies want 'brandables', but not the trite Brandbucket is offering.

A company would much rather spend $20k on a domain name then have a laughable online presence for $5,000.

BrandBucket has had its heyday, and now it's over.

Yes they can continue to use sales 101 and SEO to target keywords for people looking for "business names", "business name ideas", "company names ideas" etc.. , but the days of the easy sell are over. You have to have quality brandable domains, or have such a high volume that the law of averages plays in your favor.

The next people to catch up will be small business, then the general public. This will still take 5 to 7 years, and yes nonsense brandables will still be profitable, but as of now big-business sees right through the charade which is the reason behind the lower prices and increased inventory.

This is the state of the market right now.

Good luck.

I'm sorry, I'm not sure I see what point you're getting at with the first part of your message. I 100% agree that domainers speculating on tech names are years ahead of endusers, but technology has nothing to do with the majority of brandables. If anything your example shows how having a website has become the standard for businesses, which would further increase the demand for domains.

I don't see what businesses catching up means either. What are they catching up to? All of your thinking is centered around big business and large companies, but they don't even account for 1% of endusers. Not to mention big businesses likely already have an established brand and wouldn't be in the market for a brand anyways.

Right now, more than ever before, people are turning to the internet and e-commerce to make a living, and they likely have multiple small businesses that generate a portion of their overall income. That's the beauty of the internet. It's these individuals, developers, and small start ups that are in the market for a brand, and $20k is likely not even an option. For instance, a developer that creates a new app and expects to make maybe $50k would be in the market for something brandable and affordable. Same goes for software developers. And developers are more often than not going to have multiple apps and tools instead of one large project that generates enough to deem a $20k name valuable.

A guy who makes $40k a year on the side selling books out of his house may find something like "booketeer" and drop $1k-$2k to make it his brand. A mom that's been saving to start a small online boutique that makes $60k a year would see $2k for a posh sounding made up word a reasonable investment. THESE are the endusers that make up the brandable marketplace. Go look at all of the names sold in the past on BB and see what they were used for. I promise you won't find any big businesses.

Lastly, you're exactly right, as a domainer it would not be wise to reg 100 brandables and hope to sell one. A lot of newbies will make this mistake and get burnt, but that is the domainers fault. The marketplaces just provide the market and take a cut, and there is no denying that there are endusers in the market for brandables. Period.


Facebook, Google, Instagram, and YouTube are all brandable domains. There is no domaining w/o brandables.
So what all the moaning is about is lower quality brandables. It happens.
Brandable is an adjective based on the verb "brand" not the noun.
It is a word. When anyone uses said word, everyone here knows what is meant. The dictionaries add words after people manifest them.
That's why English is the de facto standard for business, science, and academia. It is versatile because it evolves.

Brandable marketplaces aren't going anywhere.
Even though new words are coming into existence, new companies, sites, and products arise even faster.
New GTLDs are trying to solve the same problem that brandables do.
The difference is that a coined word is much easier to trademark and much easier to rank # 1 thru 10 for, than a generic GTLD.

Ok let me rephrase. Brandable is a "word", but there is not an agreed upon definition that makes one person right or wrong as to what is a brandable name.

And while you are correct, just for arguments sake, brandable could be an adjective based on the verb or noun and still make sense. For instance, something fashionable is something related to the noun fashion. Regardless, the point that there is no set criteria that makes something brandable by definition remains the same haha


One of the stupidest names I've seen is Kasasa, and it's a fairly significant brand. It even fails the radio test. The thing about the "brandable marketplaces" I just don't get is, why would a company want a logo attached with a domain when the logo may not even remotely reflect the company's product or service, even if the name seems to work. To me the whole thing is completely back asswards. In the far majority of cases, companies develop a product and then find a name and possibly a logo that is a good fit. What kind of business goes shopping for a name and then tries to build something out of it? I know it is done, but most often it's counter-intuitive.

I'm a designer at all 3 marketplaces and the owners of the sites all say hardly anyone uses the logos after buying a name, but they all care so much about the logo because it comprises the aesthetics of their own brand. Consumer psychology is crazy, but the smallest things like design and presentation can subconsciously influence a consumers perceptions and buying habits.

In my rant earlier I kind of touched on it and said "In addition, the "cheap $2 logos" made shopping much more user friendly and allowed for domains to stand out instead of run together like the pages and pages of 200 domains listed in 12px font. And all they had to do to improve their marketplace was offer designers the possibility of $100 that didn't even come out of BBs cut" I think the logos are awesome from a consumer standpoint, and it also makes the names pop out at you to give you more of an idea of the brands "wow factor" (not sure if that's the phrase I'm looking for).

It does suck from a sellers standpoint though since you have to give up a decent chunk to the designer when you make a sale, but the site owner can't design them all, and the only way to get designers to work for free is if there is the possibility of a worthwhile return in the future. The names sell for far more at brandable marketplaces than they would anywhere else though, so it kind of cancels out anyways.
 
3
•••
3
•••
I had my names listed before the freebies so I missed out there.
To be honest, I don't think that $10 is too bad to list on Brandbucket. I just wish they were a little quicker with approvals or rejections.

Regards

Ralph.
 
2
•••
Companies have now caught onto the whole "brandable domain" charade. I can hand reg 10 brandables tomorrow that are better than 60% of the trite they have on their site, and so can other companies.

I will be dumping a lot of "brandables" unless they are TRULY good quality brandable names, unlike "janinja", "cheatly", "jurable", "okebu" etc...

It's just gibberish with a price tag.

Single word, or two word short .COM's that make sense are truly brandable, and companies are willing to pay $30k and up for quality names instead of spending $2,000 on junk.

Their "free listing" strategy is a bit of desperation as well, they know whats going on, and what's to come of 'brandables'.
 
2
•••
Facebook, Google, Instagram, and YouTube are all brandable domains. There is no domaining w/o brandables.
So what all the moaning is about is lower quality brandables. It happens.
Brandable is an adjective based on the verb "brand" not the noun.
It is a word. When anyone uses said word, everyone here knows what is meant. The dictionaries add words after people manifest them.
That's why English is the de facto standard for business, science, and academia. It is versatile because it evolves.

Brandable marketplaces aren't going anywhere.
Even though new words are coming into existence, new companies, sites, and products arise even faster.
New GTLDs are trying to solve the same problem that brandables do.
The difference is that a coined word is much easier to trademark and much easier to rank # 1 thru 10 for, than a generic GTLD.
 
Last edited:
2
•••
Imagine if one of these sites listed a brandable name that suits brand sellers? And it was a better name than theirs. And someone bought it and conquered the brandable market just from having a better name.

Because, really, the main 3 don't have very good brand names themselves.

I have BrandSeek.com if anyone is interested ;)
 
2
•••
We are in different leagues then, and your not being able to comprehend my experience with whats going on in todays market is understandable. You can lead a gTLD to water, but you can't make a .horse drink. (zing)

I don't buy for $2.95 and hope for $500 to $5,000. I buy for $2.95 and know I can sell for $xx,xxx and up.

My buyers are higher-end 'small business', close to 'big business' scale.

Please don't be offended by what I am saying; you take great offense to both facts and opinions, and it is one of the greatest hurdles to get over.

When I entered into domaining I had a conversation with one of the worlds top domainers, and he told me that my list was 'pretty light'; to put it nicely. My first instinct was, "well what does he know?!?!"

I too was a bit offended.

Domaining is personal, we rise and fall on our own decisions and picks.

However after I took a step back from by hubris I reevaluated my approach and started investing smarter, now I do regular five figure deals with developed and undeveloped names.

I've been a developer for over a decade, I know that if I started any venture with some of the terrible brandable domains on the market it would be a failure.

If anything is an indicator of just how much lunacy goes on in 'brandables', BrandBucket turned down a name I get decent offers for once a month and their 'appraisal' process is just idiotic. It's all just shots in the dark while they appraise their own privately held names higher than the rest.

I said it before and I'll say it again, owning a GOOD brandable is a smart buy, buying a poor quality domain like TecqWhis from Brandbucket or ANY brandable site is just stupidity.

Buy gibberish, and your product comes off as gibberish, unless you have angel investors throwing money at you... and at that point you will have to ask yourself why you just spent $3k on Hawttly when you could have owned a decent name for $15k.

At the end of the day, I wouldn't sell crap to anyone just because I could make a profit. It's a personal perspective, and one that has always paid off. Sell good names, sell for good prices and everyone is happy.

I hope your thread achieves rank for the keyword "brandbucket", ;) we know what you are up to silly.

Cheers!

I don't take offense to anything, everyone is entitled to their own opinion. None of it's personal and I hope you haven't taken anything personally either. Forums are for learning, so what better way than to have some heated conversations with a little more depth than your usual "How can I sell my crap domains?" thread.

My rant earlier wasn't directed specifically at you, though. It was built up from all of the hate and bashing brandable market places receive. You've shifted the conversation from brandable marketplaces to personal preference of brandable domains, which is not what I have been arguing about.

I don't focus my domaining strategy on brandable domains, and have stated several times that I personally don't think that is a wise route to take if you want to be a successful domainer. I have about 20 brandables in a portfolio of 170, and for a while now I have only been focused on aftermarket domains.

If you go back and re-read my posts, you'll see that I have been only defending brandable marketplaces because you started by saying things like:

"brandable domain charade"

"Their "free listing" strategy is a bit of desperation as well, they know whats going on, and what's to come of 'brandables'."

"Companies want 'brandables', but not the trite Brandbucket is offering."

"A company would much rather spend $20k on a domain name then have a laughable online presence for $5,000."

"BrandBucket has had its heyday, and now it's over."

I even ended my last post saying:

Lastly, you're exactly right, as a domainer it would not be wise to reg 100 brandables and hope to sell one. A lot of newbies will make this mistake and get burnt, but that is the domainers fault. The marketplaces just provide the market and take a cut, and there is no denying that there are endusers in the market for brandables. Period.

So this entire time I've been explaining why there is a market for brandables, who makes up the market, and ultimately, how brandables marketplaces will not be going anywhere because they are genius and get to make money off other peoples brandables without having to ever register a single one.

And if you're implying that I'm a brandbucket shill, you're dead wrong. I have domains at all 3, design logos at all 3, and wish all 3 the best. However, the thread was originally regarding brandbucket and they also just made some huge changes. While I support all 3 and, as an unbiased domainer I honestly believe BB is the best marketplace, which I'm sure just about everyone can agree on. BB may very well be surpassed in time, but they are the pioneer that shaped the structure of brandable marketplaces several years ago and they have made the most sales and generated the most revenue. Namerific isn't even 2 years old yet, and the founder Zane originally even worked for brandbucket. Then brandroot is still in it's infancy and just now starting to become more popular. So it's pretty self-evident that it isn't exactly an even playing field..
 
2
•••
unless they are actually SELLING the names, I dont see why I should be paying ANY fees to get it just listed...I still like brandbucket but I always sell names of my own and while I have close to 10 decent names on bb (one of them being single dictionary word .com), none of them sold...so yeah...kinda disappointed. However, i sell domains every other day to both resellers and endusers but never sold a name via bb or namerific...I think thye now just want to listing money and they are happy with that...they dont care if your domains sell...

Alistair,
They sold one of my names this month. I submitted 10 names (These were names rejected by BrandBarrel and Namerific but I just wanted to test out the platform)

I was really pleased with how fast things were done.
May 17 - Submitted 10 names
May 22 - 3 accepted - 7 rejected
May 24 - Logos completed/Listing Published
June 11 - Offer Made on 1 name/Offer accpeted
June 13 - Name transferred
June 16- Payment Received

Meanwhile, I am still waiting for three names at BB to go live that were accepted on May 26.

As long as Brandroot doesn't start accepting everything under the sun and start taking a month or more for names to get published they are worth a shot for a test anyway. My test worked out well and I will submit again in the future when I pick up some names.
 
2
•••
I currently have three names listed on brandbucket. Has anyone sold anything on brand root? Would it make sense for me to transfer my listings to them?

I would definitely list names at all 3.

If you submit your names at all 3 it's likely one will accept a name that another declines and vice versa, so that's a good place to start in deciding where to list your name. Then if you have names accepted by all 3, try and diversify among them.

As they say, never put all your eggs in one basket!

Sidenote: I will say that NR may not be the best option at the moment if you're in a hurry to have it go live. The logo design queue is pretty backed up, and has been for a while. And because there is no set order, a logo designer could claim it the same day or it could sit there for months.
 
2
•••
There was a misunderstanding on my part - it was not clear to me (maybe I missed it) - that this promotion was sent only to their already existing customers. Not sure that I see anything wrong in marketing this way to their customers at all so I've deleted what was here before.

I was under the impression it was unsolicited email - which sounds like it wasn't. I didn't care either way, myself, but don't want to mischaracterize this marketing effort as anything it wasn't.

Mea culpa.
 
Last edited:
2
•••
Thank you for the correction @DU. To further clarify, none of the email addresses were harvested electronically, nor were they taken from any of our competitors websites. This email was sent ONLY to users who have an account at Brandroot, to those who provided the email to us and to those who we send periodic feature updates and promotions.
 
Last edited:
2
•••
I have listed on all 3 websites in the past - BrandBucket , BrandRoot and Namerific.

To be honest with you given my previous experiences with Namerific and BrandBucket compared to my more recent experience of BrandRoot.

BrandBucket have gone from very strict criteria ( which was a good thing in IMHO ) to accepting maybe 1 in 2 of my submissions.

Namerific have become very slow to process names.

I think Brandroot has the best setup and I can see good things from them in the future. The logos are good , the processing times are great , response times etc and my best sale to date has been through them very recently.

I had far more names with BB and Nam yet have sold more with BrandRoot . Consequenty in future I will be concentrating (and where possible switching) my listings to the BrandRoot platform...
 
2
•••
I agree that Brandroot has provided the best service and highest rate of sales of all the platforms.

I am very fond of BrandBucket, but I think they have made a big mistake in accepting too many low quality domains. The glut of names makes it more difficult for buyers to find your names and reduces your chance of sale. They have to process more names and deal with more sellers (including unreliable ones) slowing down their service dramatically. More choice does not necessarily make customers happier - it often leads to the reverse and makes the system less useful.

Keep up the good work Michael!
 
2
•••
This thread shows that Brandroot is taking the brandable marketplace by storm. The tactics used by Brandroot are smart business IMO since the communication that spurred this thread was just between Brandroot and domainers they already had a relationship with.

I have sold names at BrandBucket, Namerific, and Brandroot. Brandroot has been a great venue for me with several recent sales. For me, Brandroot has been as good or better than BrandBucket in terms of results. Namerific started out well for me but has fallen off fast.

Brandroot is worth a try for anyone with high quality brandable names they would like to explore selling. Brandroot is probably harder to get a name accepted with now than BrandBucket, but that is a good thing as end users won't be bombarded with junk names that have little chance to sell like I see happening at BB.

Best of luck to everyone with their names!
 
2
•••
Brandroot is really great, i listed only one domain with them and that was sold, good job....:)
 
1
•••
Companies have now caught onto the whole "brandable domain" charade. I can hand reg 10 brandables tomorrow that are better than 60% of the trite they have on their site, and so can other companies.

I will be dumping a lot of "brandables" unless they are TRULY good quality brandable names, unlike "janinja", "cheatly", "jurable", "okebu" etc...

It's just gibberish with a price tag.

Single word, or two word short .COM's that make sense are truly brandable, and companies are willing to pay $30k and up for quality names instead of spending $2,000 on junk.

Their "free listing" strategy is a bit of desperation as well, they know whats going on, and what's to come of 'brandables'.
Glad someone has the nads to speak up about this nonsense. Think of a cutesy-pie word or word combination (the more absurd the better!) and stick a lame $2 logo next to it and pretend you know jack sh*t about marketing sense. What a joke.
 
1
•••
While most of the "brand" names at these sites I wouldn't want for free, the reality is they do sell enough to run a business, and there are buyers for these willing to pay 4 & 5 figures.

I don't get some of the recent .tv prices (some I do, many I don't), but that doesn't make them any less real for those profiting from it.
 
1
•••
I don't like it. That kind of business tactics smacks of desperation. Slightly unethical in my view.


'Brandables' are not all equal. Some are good, some are very good, some are just creative but not outstanding, some would qualify as garbage but this can be subjective too...

Nowadays domainers attach the 'brandable' label to any meaningless or unpronounceable domain. But the true really good brandable domains are not that many... I don't these names qualify as really good quality brandables.

I actually think BB used to own better inventory, but now that they opened the flood gates to domainers, the quality is lower due to relaxed selection criteria.

Guess I'm not done with my rant after all :p

But I just wanted to add that I hate the word "brandable" so much because:

1. BRANDABLE IS NOT A REAL WORLD

2. Everyone always throws out some random set of criteria that has to be met in order for a domain to be brandable. i.e., "The phone test" And yes, I agree that when choosing a "brandable" domain it would be in your best interest to pick a name that passes the phone test.
...BUT

3. If someone were to define "brandable" it would only be logical to combine the definitions of the root word and the meaning of the suffix, the same way that all of the real english definitions are created. And if we did that..
Brand - "name, term, design, symbol, or any other feature that identifies one seller's product distinct from those of other sellers."
+
Able - "can be done"
we would realize that if brandable was a real word..

4. I could create a new drink and call it "nfwfdgdioowowowow" and it tastes so good that it becomes as popular as coca-cola. And not one person can pronounce it, it has too many characters, and makes 0 sense, but when you go to the store and see a nice poster that says "nfwfdgdioowowowow" and you know exactly what it is. nfwfdgdioowowowow = brandable

And for anyone who feels confident they can differentiate between good and bad brandable domains, go to this link and prepare to be confused O_o http://tldinvestors.com/2013/07/brand-bucket-sales-inside-the-numbers.html
 
1
•••
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back