Ari Goldberger, Esq & John Berryhill, Esq

[Business Brands]

Hello.

Please be advised that our main client has had experience in working with Ari Goldberger, Esq and John Berryhill, Esq and came to a point of no return in their relationship.

Our main client has decided not to transact with these individuals anymore and therefore would not recommend them.

Kind regards,

 

[internext]

"In order to be defamatory, the statement must be untrue. If the statement is true or substantially true, then it is not defamatory"

Exactly! Your statement has no substance. That is what makes it problematic. You cant just come here and say "someone I know said..." There is no truth in that.... just hyperbole.

Provide substance or delete it, or it's on you! You should know better than this.

 

[Business Brands]

Okay, we would delete it, because we are not willing to provide in depth review, nor do we intend to potentially violate the law.

 

[Business Brands]

We sent our request to the moderators of the forum to delete our topic.

Should we decide to post an in depth review, we will post it.

 

[Business Brands]

At this time, we are not willing to offer further details.

 

[Business Brands]

You are really SICK!!!!!
Whatever you do with your company should be internal. Why the HELL do you list their names here?

Mods. Please take some actions with this members before things are getting more worse!!!!!

Can you possibly depart from this topic if you have nothing to contribute?

We are in domain name business for 15 years, we have substantial experience.

 

[Business Brands]

DomainNameBorker seems to want to attract the attention of pro lawyers with negative comments. Good luck.

You are diluting the topic, do not you?

 

[Business Brands]

There is no such a thing as provided. The service was sold and purchased.

 

[Business Brands]

Grilled, we do not want to argue with you.

We provided our review, and we prefer not to have page size posts in our topic.

Do you not cherish reviews?

 

[Business Brands]

He was big in domaining in 2002-2003 and than he invested everything in .us and lost big and disappeared and all of the sudden he's back, in july 2017 and want's to broker something, so he needs attention.

This is not true and off topic. Reported.

 

[Business Brands]

So you are not Yakov Yukhananov from Virtual Estate LLC no? You want me to tell you you're full history? Maybe in another thread, because it's off topic an it will be deleted anyway.

Do what you deem appropriate. Do not dilute our topics. You sound very angry.

 

[Business Brands]

I'm glad you don't want to argue. I don't want to play games. Thus, stop playing games, and there will be no argument.

Do you not see how your review (as is) is inadequate? By failing to provide sufficient details (or proof) of a bad experience, you are essentially doing a disservice by not properly informing the community. If there is a reason why you, or your main client doesn't want to do business with them, don't you feel others should know the nature of what happened, so we can be aware of their practices? Without it, how are we to take you or your client seriously? It may make some wonder if you have an ulterior motive to posting this review?

This is what we find appropriate to provide. If you find it inadequate, disregard it.

You are falsely accusing us of fraud by saying that we have posted a fake review.

 

[Business Brands]

I cherish real reviews. Not fake reviews...

Do you really cherish Donald J Trump as your signature suggests? Or, is Yakov's opinion, not subject to that of DomainNameBroker.com?
Show attachment 71078
(The above FB post is a public post, indexed and cached by Google)

If you repeat that we have posted a fake review, then there is nothing we want to talk to you about.

Please do not address us further and stay away from our topics.

As we have previously said, we do not find you adequate, and we still do not.

 

[Business Brands]

We, is the reference to Domain Name Broker, LLC

 

[Business Brands]

Do we have to reveal our identity?

So, if we were praising someone we would not have to reveal our identity, but if we are criticizing, then we have to? In what topic do we have to reveal our identity? Do we change our user name, or do we need in every topic, where we are not praising anyone, post our name?

 

[Business Brands]

Our main client does not have an account on this forum.

 

[Chris Hydrick]

Do we have to reveal our identity?

So, if we were praising someone we would not have to reveal our identity, but if we are criticizing, then we have to? In what topic do we have to reveal our identity? Do we change our user name, or do we need in every topic, where we are not praising anyone, post our name?

As you are aware in the RipOffReport you posted on NamePros about Frank Schilling, the legal system can subpoena websites for members / commenters information. If you are a proxy review, then the person giving the review and/or experience may or may not be held accountable for the posts. Thus, it is important for this forum to disallow proxy reviews to prevent liable and slanderous reviews from being unaccountable. Essentially, by hiding behind DNB, your client, is using a proxy IP which is not allowed per NP rules.

 

[Business Brands]

As you are aware in the RipOffReport you posted on NamePros about Frank Schilling, the legal system can subpoena websites for members / commenters information. If you are a proxy review, then the person giving the review and/or experience may or may not be held accountable for the posts. Thus, it is important for this forum to disallow proxy reviews to prevent liable and slanderous reviews from being unaccountable. Essentially, by hiding behind DNB, your client, is using a proxy IP which is not allowed per NP rules.

We can not communicate with you. We think you will further damage our topics, falsely accuse us of fraud and post irrelevant and personal information to take our topic in a different direction. Thank you for your participation, but it is no longer welcome.

 

[Business Brands]

Reported. False claims.

We do not post false claims.

 

[Business Brands]

Our short, one post review, now grew into a diluted non structured topic.

 

[Business Brands]

If it's not false you need to prove it, not just accuse that somebody did something, it's like you are saying that somebody was stealing, but you don't know who's the victim, where it happened and when, so there is no crime.

We can not say that someone was stealing, this is a very serious claim.

We are saying our main client's relationship with the above mentioned individuals gone very bad and the relationship has ended in a disgrace, with a decision to not transact in the future.

Is this a clear review or a questionable review?

 

[Business Brands]

We are not trying to defame anybody, this is an actual review.

 

[Business Brands]

It's questionable....you are not the victim, supposedly the 'victim' told you the story, but didn't gived you any prove and you don't have a prove that something happened. Let's say that I will say in two weeks that I had a client that had a very bad experience with domainnamebroker.com. Is that questionable? Like you, I can say whatever I want if I don't need to prove it.

If you had a bad experience and say you had bad experience, it is better than having a bad experience and not saying about it.

 

[Business Brands]

We provided as detailed of a review, as we think we are allowed to offer by law, and we think our review is truthful and has a full ground.

 

[Business Brands]

"In order to be defamatory, the statement must be untrue. If the statement is true or substantially true, then it is not defamatory"