When I report a domain name sale to NameBio I provide or at least am always willing and able to provide proof in the way of escrow or other screenshots. With my higher price sales I am required to provide proof. I understand that when Mike Mann or Rick Schwartz report their sales to Ron Jackson / DNJ they provide NO proof. Also, I understand that when Mike Mann or Rick Schwartz "sell" a domain with an installment plan, they immediately report it as SOLD for the entire price, even if only a deposit was made and even if the buyer eventually defaults on the payments. (On the other hand, I just "sold" a domain for high five figures with a substantial deposit of mid-five figures and yet since payments go out for the next couple years, Michael at NameBio let me know that he may not report it as a sale until after the last payment is completed and the domain is transferred, not to escrow holding, but to the buyer.) For example, this is an example of a reported "sale" by Rick Schwartz that obviously ended up with payment default by the buyer, and yet was reported as a done deal from day one. I understand that Mike Mann does the same. So, how many of Mike Mann’s and Rick Schwartz's reported sales are either inaccurate (in that they are posted without proof) or based on, to put it kindly, "forward-looking statements" of installment plans that are not yet completed. May we even know?