NameSilo

Are LLLL.nets that are words worth anything?

NamecheapNamecheap
Watch

robg

Established Member
Impact
0
I don't mean random LLLL's, but ones that are single words. Some examples (completely random): rate.net, hate.net, weak.net, meat.net, bath.net, etc.
 
0
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
AfternicAfternic
robg said:
I don't mean random LLLL's, but ones that are single words. Some examples (completely random): rate.net, hate.net, weak.net, meat.net, bath.net, etc.
The LLLL.nets you came up with are sure worth something. Would love to have hate.net for example.

I have faith in short, good, generic domains. Preferably .com of course. Read somewhere that the use of mobile Internet, in its cradle at the moment, will demand shorter and easier to type domain names. Some part of me agree with that.

Maybe the current LLLL.com wildfire will spread over to LLLL.net as well? I went ahead and regged a .net yesterday, took Ocka.net, name for "a uncultivated male" in Australia :).

But .net will always be the unknown cousin of king .com.

Cheers
 
0
•••
robg said:
I don't mean random LLLL's, but ones that are single words. Some examples (completely random): rate.net, hate.net, weak.net, meat.net, bath.net, etc.

Of course this kind of names have substantial value, as for all the other dictionary words .net
The fact that they are so short is also an addedd value. Unfortunately, most of the pronunciable llll.net (and almost all cvcv.net) are taken, so meaningful 4 letter .net are not an easy find. If you have found any for regfee, I'd say go for it.
 
0
•••
LOL ;) sure ... sorry

like this:
Duck.net sold for $6,200
Mint.net sold for $8,155

(source Namebio.com)

I think 6200 $ & 8155$ count as ANYTHING (for me)
 
0
•••
Dynadot — .com TransferDynadot — .com Transfer
Appraise.net

We're social

Escrow.com
Spaceship
Rexus Domain
CryptoExchange.com
Catchy
CatchDoms
NameMaxi - Your Domain Has Buyers
DomDB
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back