- Impact
- 12,971
Hey Folks
Okay so after a discussion on a NP Thread about someone complaining about the quality of PM's they are getting that are not related to his WTB request. Many WTB posters have detailed instructions of what they want and often they still get some irrelevant submissions or domains that are loosely related. I admit I might have also at times submitted domains that could be a bit of a stretch, maybe still relevant but with some imagination..lol
However the fault is not always that of the person submitting, often there are WTB threads that have almost no details and leave the door wide open for interpretation. Then the poster gets annoyed with the quality of domains being submitted and the submitters get annoyed by the lack of response.
So I was wondering, would it not be a good idea to maybe include a standard format for WTB threads?
For example, let say I was looking for an aged domain in the cooking niche with high search volume.
TLD:
Com/Net/Club/Online/
Open to Alternatives or Non Negotiable:
Not Negotiable
********************************
Age:
10 years+
Open to Alternatives or Non Negotiable:
Open to Alternatives
********************************
Preffered Registrars:
Name/GD/NamesCheap
Open to Alternatives or Non Negotiable:
Open to Alternatives
********************************
Must Contain Any Of the Following Words:
Cooking/Recipes/Meals
********************************
Description / Additional Info:
Domain must have more than 5000 US searches and a minimum CPC of $1
Looking for exact match, keyword domains.
Max 3 Words.
Open to Alternatives or Non Negotiable
Not Negotiabe
********************************
Budget Per Domain:
$500
Open to Increase or Non Negotiable:
Open to consider increasing the budget for the right domain
This is just a example of what I mean but I'm sure you guys get the idea.. obviously I;m sure more stuff can be added..but the point is... would this be a good idea or waste of time trying to implement?
Okay so after a discussion on a NP Thread about someone complaining about the quality of PM's they are getting that are not related to his WTB request. Many WTB posters have detailed instructions of what they want and often they still get some irrelevant submissions or domains that are loosely related. I admit I might have also at times submitted domains that could be a bit of a stretch, maybe still relevant but with some imagination..lol
However the fault is not always that of the person submitting, often there are WTB threads that have almost no details and leave the door wide open for interpretation. Then the poster gets annoyed with the quality of domains being submitted and the submitters get annoyed by the lack of response.
So I was wondering, would it not be a good idea to maybe include a standard format for WTB threads?
For example, let say I was looking for an aged domain in the cooking niche with high search volume.
TLD:
Com/Net/Club/Online/
Open to Alternatives or Non Negotiable:
Not Negotiable
********************************
Age:
10 years+
Open to Alternatives or Non Negotiable:
Open to Alternatives
********************************
Preffered Registrars:
Name/GD/NamesCheap
Open to Alternatives or Non Negotiable:
Open to Alternatives
********************************
Must Contain Any Of the Following Words:
Cooking/Recipes/Meals
********************************
Description / Additional Info:
Domain must have more than 5000 US searches and a minimum CPC of $1
Looking for exact match, keyword domains.
Max 3 Words.
Open to Alternatives or Non Negotiable
Not Negotiabe
********************************
Budget Per Domain:
$500
Open to Increase or Non Negotiable:
Open to consider increasing the budget for the right domain
Last edited: