- Impact
- 18,360
I don't usually keep stats on my work, but since I posted a "year end review" last year, I figured I'd do one for this year too. This was 2024: https://www.namepros.com/threads/my-year-end-udrp-roundup.1340191/
There's an outside chance that one of the pending cases I'm defending might reach a decision before the end of the year, but since it's that time of year when everyone does their year-end wrap-up, I'll update if necessary.
I had a few more UDRP defenses than last year, and they went relatively well. There was one case that was an agreed transfer, so it wasn't really a "defense" in any real sense, but here's how they shook out. I thought November was a crazy month with four decisions issued this month (they issue a couple of weeks after the work is done), but I didn't realize I had five decisions in July, and still averaged two a month. The ones marked in bold were RDNH decisions:
I pulled these from UDRP.tools, so it might be incomplete. Once in a while the data tagging is off.
Out of this year's batch, a couple stand out as having been a lot of fun. In Concreted.com, the complainant was represented by a "brand protection agency" called Marqvision which relied heavily on AI for their filings. That was a portent of things to come in Nexim.com and UpscaleAvenues.com, which were both done by people who figured AI could win their case. All I have to say is that I hope more people start using AI for these things, because I really do love pointing out when it goes off the rails.
I enjoyed working with @Igor Gabrielan on Voices.ai. That one was interesting and had some unique issues.
Rams.com was interesting. It's not everyday you get to go up against a professional football team, although the Complainant in Cripto.com has a stadium named after them. So those two cases are sort of bookends to the year.
Anyway, there might be one more to drop, and I'll update if so.
There's an outside chance that one of the pending cases I'm defending might reach a decision before the end of the year, but since it's that time of year when everyone does their year-end wrap-up, I'll update if necessary.
I had a few more UDRP defenses than last year, and they went relatively well. There was one case that was an agreed transfer, so it wasn't really a "defense" in any real sense, but here's how they shook out. I thought November was a crazy month with four decisions issued this month (they issue a couple of weeks after the work is done), but I didn't realize I had five decisions in July, and still averaged two a month. The ones marked in bold were RDNH decisions:
I pulled these from UDRP.tools, so it might be incomplete. Once in a while the data tagging is off.
Out of this year's batch, a couple stand out as having been a lot of fun. In Concreted.com, the complainant was represented by a "brand protection agency" called Marqvision which relied heavily on AI for their filings. That was a portent of things to come in Nexim.com and UpscaleAvenues.com, which were both done by people who figured AI could win their case. All I have to say is that I hope more people start using AI for these things, because I really do love pointing out when it goes off the rails.
I enjoyed working with @Igor Gabrielan on Voices.ai. That one was interesting and had some unique issues.
Rams.com was interesting. It's not everyday you get to go up against a professional football team, although the Complainant in Cripto.com has a stadium named after them. So those two cases are sort of bookends to the year.
Anyway, there might be one more to drop, and I'll update if so.
