100% agree with you JB in that respect.
Do you feel they should stop that kind of advertising then? Here are some of the replies under that tweet:
"...until we decide you aren't worthy of speech"
"You're not for free speech, so I don't care what you have to say. I'll never do business with you.
"Just not free speech huh? Not REAL free speech, only what we believe in, and have the guts to stand up for?"
"Oh look at all that free speech support! Anyone ever notice how EVERY SINGLE one of these "Muh free speech" platforms ALWAYS fail when confronted with the part of "free speech" where they have to allow speech they actually disagree with."
"Ah yes, once it's been proven you DON'T ACTUALLY STAND FOR FREE SPEECH, you fall back on the "Muh death threats" Nobody believes you, you hypocritical pieces of garbage. Once again proving that the right-wing SJWs like YOU are no different than regular SJWs. How pathetic."
"Oh boo hoo, media slapped you around without investigating to get the story right. Kind of like how you dropped hosting without investigating to get the facts straight. You're getting hate for a knee-jerk hypocritical reaction, not because you're right. Zero sympathy."
"Oh and look, they deleted the tweet from earlier to Josh wherein they said free speech has limits, because they're good little cucks Good thing the internet never forgets!"
"I hate xxxxxxxxx more than most but that doesn’t mean I think websites should be pulled because of it, hell let it happen so the users can ID and expose those scumbags. Most people on those sites despise those fuckers."
"The fearmongering regarding chan sites has gotten excessive. “Oh no they let people outside the Overton window communicate, how terrible!” has become far too common of a sentiment."
-----------
See what I'm saying? If you're going to use that angle to promote, some of the people that were engaged in the past, are going to want you to go all the way with it or you get this kind of stuff.
All those replies are from here: